UIPL30-10a1.pdf

ETA Advisory File Text

Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Score Outcome Percent Of Contributory Employers AuditedPercent Total W age Change Resulting From AuditAnnualized Percent Of Total W ages AuditedAverage Number of Misclassified W orkers Detected Per AuditEffective Audit Measure Total ScoreEffective Audit Measure Results Passin g Score Passin g Score Passin g Score Passin g Score Passin g Score Pass P 1 2 1 1 7 Factors Passed A K 2.2 5.2 1.0 1.7 10.1 P AL 2.1 0.8 1.5 0.3 4.7 2 AR 0.1 14.9 0.0 4.0 19.0 2 AZ 1.5 3.8 1.4 2.1 8.8 P CA 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.4 1 CO 0.9 4.7 0.9 2.6 9.1 2 CT 2.0 4.4 1.8 2.1 10.3 P DC 2.1 2.1 0.9 0.6 5.7 2 DE 1.6 1.5 1.0 0.2 4.3 2 FL 1.3 10.1 0.9 0.5 12.8 2 GA 2.0 2.3 0.9 0.3 5.5 2 HI 2.2 1.7 3.3 0.4 7.6 2 IA 2.0 1.6 0.9 0.1 4.6 1 ID 1.0 9.8 0.7 1.2 12.7 3 IL 1.5 9.4 1.2 2.5 14.6 P IN 2.2 8.1 1.1 3.2 14.6 P KS 1.0 1.9 0.4 0.6 3.9 1 KY 2.1 2.9 1.6 1.0 7.6 P LA 1.3 3.1 0.5 0.5 5.4 2 MA 0.5 3.8 0.6 2.5 7.4 2 MD 2.0 13.9 1.3 3.7 20.9 P ME 1.6 4.6 0.6 0.7 7.5 2 MI 1.2 2.3 2.2 2.0 7.7 P MN 2.0 6.7 3.0 0.2 11.9 3 MO 2.2 1.7 1.1 0.2 5.2 2 MS 2.0 3.2 1.1 0.3 6.6 3 MT 2.3 7.3 2.4 1.9 13.9 P NC 1.6 5.7 1.4 0.6 9.3 3 ND 1.5 2.6 0.8 0.5 5.4 2 NE 2.2 1.0 1.9 0.7 5.8 2 NH 1.5 6.4 1.3 1.4 10.6 P NJ 2.0 6.0 1.6 3.0 12.6 P NM 1.9 2.2 1.3 0.6 6.0 3 NV 1.9 7.8 1.0 0.6 11.3 3 NY 1.8 10.8 2.3 6.6 21.5 P OH 1.8 6.1 0.7 0.9 9.5 2 OK 1.7 3.2 1.1 0.6 6.6 3 OR 1.3 10.0 0.8 1.9 14.0 3 PA 1.0 13.3 0.5 3.1 17.9 3 PR 0.8 8.8 2.0 2.5 14.1 3 RI 1.9 5.6 1.3 0.9 9.7 3 SC 2.0 5.7 1.1 0.8 9.6 3 SD 2.1 1.3 2.2 0.6 6.2 2 TN 2.0 4.6 1.1 1.2 8.9 P TX 2.0 3.2 0.8 0.7 6.7 2 UT 1.8 15.9 1.2 3.9 22.8 P VA 2.0 2.0 1.6 0.4 6.0 3 VI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 VT 1.9 3.5 2.8 0.6 8.8 3 WA 2.2 6.5 1.6 0.9 11.2 3 WI 1.7 11.7 1.0 4.1 18.5 P WV 2.4 3.6 1.2 0.7 7.9 3 WY 2.1 8.3 2.0 0.5 12.9 3 Total Passing47 43 35 23 35 15Attachment I Calendar Year 2009 Pro Forma Results Proposed Effective Audit Measure