Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
03/03/1981
3(2) |
Mr. Mark A. Vogel |
Your sole request is for an opinion that in the event a participant in the SEP chooses to rollover funds from the IRA established under the SEP to another IRA maintained by a Broker-Dealer affiliate, that second IRA is not an "employee pension benefit plan" within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA. |
|
02/27/1981
3(4) |
Mr. Richard L. Stiles |
Whether the Plan is not covered by title I of ERISA as it is considered a small welfare as defined in the limited exemption for certain small welfare plans provided in 29 C.F.R. §2520.104-20. |
|
02/26/1981
3(1) 3(2) |
Mr. David T. Mitzner |
Whether the Deferred Compensation Plan of Petro-Lewis Corporation is not covered by title I of ERISA. |
|
02/25/1981
414 |
Matthew T. Kissane, Esquire |
Whether the receipt of deferred compensation after June 30, 1977, for services rendered to the Trust prior to that date are prohibited transaction under ERISA, |
|
02/18/1981
3(2) |
Mr. Mark S. Dray |
Whether certain payments by United Virginia Bankshares Incorporated (the Company) would constitute an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA. |
|
02/09/1981
104 3(1) 403(a) 404(a)(1) 514(a) |
Steven L. Ross, Esq. |
Whether the Trust and the Committee may continue to operate in the manner outlined in the letter. As stated in your submission of September 14, 1979, of particular concern in this regard is the requirement in section 403(a) of ERISA that, in general, the assets of an employee benefit plan |
|
02/09/1981
|
Mr. Lawrence J. Hass |
Whether the sale of the King of Prussia Park Trust (King of Prussia) by Citibank, as trustee for employee benefit plans, to RREEF USA FUND-I (RREEF) did not constitute a prohibited transaction under sections 406 and 407 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and section 4975(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (IRC). |
|
02/05/1981
|
Ms. Jane B. Stranch |
Whether the Remembrance Fund of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, Local 572 (the Remembrance Fund) is exempted from the reporting and disclosure provisions of ERISA. |
|
02/02/1981
|
Mr. G. Boone Smith, III |
Whether the Plan is neither an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(1) nor an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(2). |
|
01/29/1981
103(a) |
Mr. J. Robert Ash |
Whether an "Employer Group Agreement" between Employer Dental Services, Inc. (EDS) and an employer sponsoring a prepaid dental plan, under which EDS agrees to provide specified dental benefits to employees and their eligible dependents is an insurance contract or policy issued by an insurance company or similar organization which is qualified to do business in a state for purposes of 29 C.F.R. §2520.104-20(b)(ii). |