Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
08/10/1981
3(14) |
Mr. Richard A. Naegele |
Whether the proposed loan by the Plan to the Lakeland Medical Center, Inc. (the Medical Center) raises issues under Part 4 of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (the Code). |
|
08/03/1981
3(2) |
Mr. Alexander Welch |
Whether the Escrow Account is not an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA and is not an employee benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(3) of ERISA, it is not subject to title I of ERISA. |
|
07/24/1981
3(16) 3(32) 4(b)(1) |
Carroll J. Savage, Esq. |
Whether the reporting and disclosure requirements of Part 1 of title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) apply to the Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE & G). |
|
07/24/1981
3(1) 514 |
Ms. Katherine D. Woodruff |
Whether the plans of seven Holiday Inns funded by a trust created by each of the Holiday Inns are employee welfare benefit plans within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA. Second, whether section 514 of ERISA preempts the procedural requirements of the Florida Department of Insurance (Insurance Department) which calls for a predetermination by the Department of Labor (the Department) that an employee benefit plan is subject to ERISA. |
|
07/21/1981
403( c) 403(a) 404(a) 514 |
Mr. L. Gerald Roach |
Whether the Credit Union is an employee organization within the meaning of section 3(4) of ERISA, and whether the group legal services program is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA |
|
07/21/1981
3(1) 3(4) |
Mr. Ira Michael Shepard |
Whether the N&W Employees Credit Union (the Credit Union) is an employee organization within the meaning of section 3(4) of ERISA and whether a prepaid legal services program sponsored by the Credit Union for its members is an employee welfare benefit plan covered by ERISA title I. |
|
07/21/1981
104 3(2) 3(3) |
Mr. Homer L. Elliott |
Whether the Plan is not subject to the provisions of title I of ERISA. |
|
07/15/1981
103 3(4) |
Mr. William Kinnunen, Jr. |
Whether the Fund is subject to the ERISA and whether an accountant's opinion is necessary as part of the annual report filed by the Fund. Finally, if the Fund's annual report is required to include an accountant's opinion you request that the Department of Labor (the Department) grant an exemption from that requirement. |
|
07/02/1981
4(b) |
Mr. J. Patrick Pokorny |
Whether the Pension Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees of Wabush Mines, Pickands Mather & Company, Managing Agent, Arnaud Railway Company and Wabush Lake Railway Company, Limited (the Plan), constitutes an employee pension benefit plan subject to coverage under title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). |
|
06/29/1981
3(2) |
Mr. Gary W. Maeder |
Whether an individual retirement account (IRA) established by Christopher Stone to receive his distribution from his previous employer's tax-qualified retirement plan is subject to title I of ERISA. |