Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
08/15/2007
3(40) 514(b)(6) |
The Honorable Catherine Cortez Masto |
Whether an employee benefit arrangement sponsored by Payroll Solutions Group Limited constitutes a "multiple employer welfare arrangement" within the meaning of section 3(40) of ERISA subject to regulation under the insurance laws of the State of Nevada pursuant to section 514(b)(6) of ERISA. |
|
07/18/2007
406 |
J. Jerome Coogan, Esq. |
Whether reimbursements of certain monies by a training plan to local unions that are parties in interest to such plan would be a prohibited transaction under ERISA section 406. |
|
06/08/2007
408(b)(8) |
John J. Cleary, Esq. |
Whether a U.S. branch of a foreign bank qualifies as a "bank or trust company" for purposes of exemptions provided under ERISA section 408(b)(8) and PTE 91-38. |
|
02/26/2007
PTE 84-14 |
Melanie Franco Nussdorf, Esq. |
Whether the 10% test applicable to pooled investment vehicles under the QPAM class exemption (84-14) does not require consideration of any underlying plan investors in a pooled fund investing in another pooled fund. |
|
01/22/2007
PTE 84-14 |
Melanie Franco Nussdorf, Esq. |
Whether transactions between a broker-dealer and a separate account managed by a QPAM under a 401(k) plan fail to satisfy section I(a) of PTE 84-14 where plan participants investing in such account receive investment allocation advice from a subsidiary of the broker-dealer. |
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
12/19/2006
4975( c)(1)(A) 4975( c)(1)(B) |
Edward A. Appelt |
This advisory opinion concludes that a self-directed IRA‘s investment in notes of a corporation, a majority of whose stock is owned by the son-in-law of the IRA owner, would be a prohibited transaction under the Internal Revenue Code. |
|
10/03/2006
404(a) |
Donald J. Myers, Esq. |
Whether a fiduciary of a defined benefit plan may, consistent with the requirements of section 404 of ERISA, consider the liability obligations of the plan and the risks associated with such liability obligations in determining a prudent investment strategy for the plan. |
|
08/15/2006
PTE 91-38 |
Stephen M. Saxon, Esq. |
Whether Chevy Chase Trust Company (CCTC) would be considered a bank, and whether certain collective investment funds for which CCTC acts as trustee would be considered to be maintained by a bank for purposes of PTE 91-38. |
|
07/26/2006
PTE 77-3 |
Mr. F. Jefferson Bragdon |
Whether the prohibition on the payment of sales commissions in PTE 77-3 applies to the payment of 12b-1 Fees by a proprietary mutual fund to an unrelated broker. |
|
07/26/2006
3(32) |
Alice League, Esq. |
Whether certain employee benefit programs of the Federal Reserve System are excluded from the requirements of Title I under section 4(b)(1) of ERISA as "governmental plan[s]" within the meaning of section 3(32) of ERISA. |