Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
07/20/2012
407(d)(4) 408(e) |
Mr. Brian Berglund |
Whether the requirements for "qualifying employer real property" under ERISA section 407(d)(4)(A) are satisfied when a single parcel of real property is contributed to or sold by a pension plan such that section 408(e) of ERISA would be available for such transaction. |
|
05/25/2012
3(2) |
Robert J. Toth, Jr. |
Whether a retirement savings program marketed by 401(k) Advantage LLC as a multiple employer plan would be a single “employee benefit plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(2) where multiple unrelated employers adopt the Plan to provide retirement benefits to their employees. |
|
05/25/2012
3(2) |
Mark A. Sletto, Esquire |
Whether an arrangement to be established by National Retirement Plan, Inc. to merge unrelated abandoned individual account plans would constitute an “employee pension benefit plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(2).
|
|
05/25/2012
3(32)(A) |
Ms. Sandy L. Friess, CPA |
Whether the status of a “safe harbor” 403(b) plan under 29 C.F.R. 2510.3-2(f) would be adversely affected if the employer makes “matching” contributions into another pension plan based on the employees’ salary deferrals to the 403(b) plan. |
|
04/27/2012
3(32) 4(b)(1) |
The Honorable Dannel P. Malloy |
Whether the status of the Group Health Plan for Employees of the State of Connecticut as a "governmental plan" within the meaning of section 3(32) of ERISA would be adversely affected if the State permitted participation by certain private nonprofit employers who perform public service functions under contract with the State or receive substantial funding from governmental sources. |
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
12/16/2011
406 |
Mr. Bruce Cooper |
Whether certain cash contributions to a pension plan by the Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Labor Management Cooperation Trust would result in prohibited transactions under section 406 of ERISA and section 4975 of the Code. |
|
10/20/2011
PTE 80-26 |
Mr. Timothy Berry |
Whether PTE 80-26 provides relief for an indemnification agreement between an IRA owner and a broker where such agreement is required in order for the IRA to engage in futures trading. |
|
06/21/2011
PTE 86-128 |
Melanie Franco Nussdorf, Esq. |
Whether PTE 86-128 provides relief for covered transactions engaged in by any person who is a fiduciary solely by reason of rendering investment advice to the plan. |
|
04/25/2011
PTE 84-14 |
Melanie Franco Nussdorf, Esq. |
Whether Section I(a) of PTE 84-14, as amended (QPAM), is satisfied in the context of a stable value program where a stable value manager is responsible for negotiating stable value wrap contracts with various banks or insurance companies. |
|
02/04/2011
406(b) PTE 84-14 |
Kathleen Ziga, Esq. |
Whether ERISA section 406(b) violations occur if an investment manager for various pension plans executes securities transactions with certain brokerage firms that have a remote relationship to the investment manager through their corporate parent, and related issues concerning the applicability of PTE 84-14, as amended (QPAM). |