Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

2012
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
07/20/2012
407(d)(4)
408(e)

Mr. Brian Berglund
Bryan Cave LLP
One Metropolitan Square
211 North Broadway, Suite 3600
St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2750

Whether the requirements for "qualifying employer real property" under ERISA section 407(d)(4)(A) are satisfied when a single parcel of real property is contributed to or sold by a pension plan such that section 408(e) of ERISA would be available for such transaction.

05/25/2012
3(2)

Robert J. Toth, Jr.
Law Offices of Robert J. Toth, Jr.
110 West Berry Street, Suite 1809
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802

Whether a retirement savings program marketed by 401(k) Advantage LLC as a multiple employer plan would be a single “employee benefit plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(2) where multiple unrelated employers adopt the Plan to provide retirement benefits to their employees.

05/25/2012
3(2)

Mark A. Sletto, Esquire
Benefits & Business Law Advisors, PLLC
2600 Eagan Woods Drive, Suite 450 
Eagan, Minnesota 55121-1152

Whether an arrangement to be established by National Retirement Plan, Inc. to merge unrelated abandoned individual account plans would constitute an “employee pension benefit plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(2).

 

 
05/25/2012
3(32)(A)

Ms. Sandy L. Friess, CPA
WIPFLi LLP 
2901 East Enterprise Avenue
Suite 500
Appleton, WI 54913

Whether the status of a “safe harbor” 403(b) plan under 29 C.F.R. 2510.3-2(f) would be adversely affected if the employer makes “matching” contributions into another pension plan based on the employees’ salary deferrals to the 403(b) plan.
 

04/27/2012
3(32)
4(b)(1)

The Honorable Dannel P. Malloy
Governor of Connecticut
State Capitol
210 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106

Whether the status of the Group Health Plan for Employees of the State of Connecticut as a "governmental plan" within the meaning of section 3(32) of ERISA would be adversely affected if the State permitted participation by certain private nonprofit employers who perform public service functions under contract with the State or receive substantial funding from governmental sources.

2011
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
12/16/2011
406

Mr. Bruce Cooper
Pitta & Giblin, LLP
120 Broadway, 28th Floor
New York, New York 10271

Whether certain cash contributions to a pension plan by the Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Labor Management Cooperation Trust would result in prohibited transactions under section 406 of ERISA and section 4975 of the Code.

10/20/2011
PTE 80-26

Mr. Timothy Berry
1812 E. Toledo
Gilbert, AZ 85295

Whether PTE 80-26 provides relief for an indemnification agreement between an IRA owner and a broker where such agreement is required in order for the IRA to engage in futures trading.

06/21/2011
PTE 86-128

Melanie Franco Nussdorf, Esq.
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC  20036

Whether PTE 86-128 provides relief for covered transactions engaged in by any person who is a fiduciary solely by reason of rendering investment advice to the plan.

04/25/2011
PTE 84-14

Melanie Franco Nussdorf, Esq.
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC  20036

Whether Section I(a) of PTE 84-14, as amended (QPAM), is satisfied in the context of a stable value program where a stable value manager is responsible for negotiating stable value wrap contracts with various banks or insurance companies.

02/04/2011
406(b)
PTE 84-14

Kathleen Ziga, Esq.
Dechert LLP
2929 Arch Street, Cira Centre
Philadelphia, PA 19104-2808

Susan M. Camillo, Esq.
Dechert LLP
200 Clarendon Street, 27th Floor
Boston, MA 02116-5021

Whether ERISA section 406(b) violations occur if an investment manager for various pension plans executes securities transactions with certain brokerage firms that have a remote relationship to the investment manager through their corporate parent, and related issues concerning the applicability of PTE 84-14, as amended (QPAM).