Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
05/17/2000
3(32) |
Mr. Martin S. Rosenthal |
The applicability of Title I of ERISA to the OCSEA Benefits Trust. The Trust provides welfare benefits to approximately 47,000 active employees, former employees, and to dependents of active or former employees. |
|
05/17/2000
3(32) |
Ms. Joan Ebert Rothermel |
Whether certain employee benefit plans are "governmental plans" within the meaning of section 3(32) of Title I of ERISA. Specifically, the plans covered by your request are: the Annuity Plan of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York; the Health and Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York; and the Retiree Health and Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York.3 |
|
05/17/2000
3(33) |
Robert L. Abramowitz, Esq. |
Whether certain employee benefit arrangements described in your letter are "church plans" within the meaning of section 3(33) of Title I of ERISA. |
|
03/30/2000
3(32) |
Mr. Richard L. Davenport, F.S.A |
Whether the Tulsa Firefighters Health and Welfare Plan is excluded from Title I of ERISA as a "governmental plan" within the meaning of section 3(32). |
|
03/27/2000
3(32) |
Ms. Theresa Lensander |
Whether the Employees’ Money Purchase Pension Plan of the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32), therefore, excluded by section 4(b)(1) from coverage. |
|
02/28/2000
3(33) |
Mr. Robert A. Johnson |
Whether certain employee benefit arrangements of the College are "church plans" within the meaning of § 3(33) of ERISA. If the Plans are not "church plans," they would be employee benefit plans within the meaning of the Act. |
|
02/18/2000
3(32) |
Mary L. Stoll, Esq. |
Whether the status of the Trust Fund as a "governmental plan" under section 3(32) of ERISA would be adversely affected if the Trust Fund were extended to cover employees of Local 71 (Union), all of whom are non-governmental employees. |
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
12/28/1999
404(a)(1)(D) |
Thomas J. Lilly |
Regarding the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA. Specifically, whether an assertion made by Fund trustees that they may only be removed (other than by death or resignation) "for cause" would establish lifetime terms of appointment inconsistent with the fiduciary responsibility requirements of ERISA and Advisory Opinion 85-41A. |
|
12/09/1999
406(b)(1) |
Lennine Occhino |
Whether the payment of certain performance-based compensation to Mount Lucas Management Corporation by employee benefit plan clients would violate section 406(b) of ERISA or section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. |
|
11/19/1999
3(32) |
Melvin H. Pizer, Esq. |
Whether the East Islip Teachers' Association, Local 2618, AFT Welfare Trust Fund is a "governmental plan," as defined in ERISA section 3(32) and, thus, that it is excluded from ERISA Title I coverage by section 4(b)(1). |