Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
12/04/2002
PTE 92-5 |
Seymour Goldberg, Esq. |
Concerning the applicability of PTE 92-5, (57 FR 5019, February 11, 1992), to a transfer of a life insurance contract by a participant to his or her employee benefit plan. |
|
10/17/2002
3(32) |
Neil D. Lipton, Esq. |
Whether the Communications Workers of America, Local 1180 Members' Annuity Fund remains a "governmental plan" if it extends eligibility to its trustees, who are Local 1180 officers, and accepts contributions for any trustee whom Local 1180 employs, since the Fund otherwise exclusively covers government employees of NYC and related public employers whose bargaining agreements require them to provide all contributions currently received by the Fund. |
|
09/30/2002
3(32) |
Ian D. Lanoff, Esq. |
Whether two UC pension plans adversely affect exclusion from Title I of ERISA as "governmental plans" by awarding service credits and transferring account balances connected with about two years when UC San Francisco Medical Center transferred a group of employees, now reemployed by the Medical Center and again participating in UC plans, to employment with the Medical Center's now-terminated, private sector joint venture with Stanford University and to coverage by the joint venture's private sector pension plans. |
|
09/06/2002
3(32) |
Michael T. Scaraggi, Esq. |
Application of the "governmental plan" definition in section 3(32) of ERISA to the Port Authority PBA Welfare Fund for purposes of the coverage exclusion in section 4(b)(1) of ERISA. |
|
08/20/2002
404(a) 408(b)(2) |
Michael A. Crabtree, Esq. |
Whether indemnification and limitation of liability provisions in a plan's service provider contract would violate the fiduciary provisions of ERISA. |
|
07/25/2002
3(37) |
Ronald E. Richman, Esq. Michael S. Melbinger, Esq. |
Application of the substantial business purpose test in paragraph (c) of 29 CFR 2510.3-37, for purposes of the definition of a "multiemployer plan" in ERISA Sec. 3(37). |
|
07/03/2002
404(a) |
J. Larry Savell, Chairman |
Application of Sec. 404(a)(1) of ERISA where trustees of a Taft-Hartley multiemployer plan, as the sole parties authorized under the trust agreement to establish delinquent contribution procedures, did so, but where different delinquent contribution procedures were subsequently agreed to in a collective bargaining agreement that the trustees were not party to. |
|
06/07/2002
PTE 77-4 |
Melanie Franco Nussdorf, Esq. |
Whether the prohibition in PTE 77-4 (42 FR 18732, April 8, 1977) on sales commission payments would apply to commissions paid by a plan to an independent broker who executes the plan’s purchase or sale of shares of open-end investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 through a securities exchange. |
|
06/07/2002
408(e) |
Wallace M. Starke, Esq. |
Application of Sec. 408(e) of ERISA to certain transactions between a plan and various personal trusts and estates sharing a common trustee with the plan. |
|
06/07/2002
206(d) |
Alsee McDaniel, Director |
Application of Sec. 206(d) of ERISA with respect to the Mississippi Department of Human Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement. |