Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
03/06/1998
IRC 408(A) |
Kristine J. Coffey, Chair |
Whether a Roth IRA as defined in Internal Revenue Code section 408A will be considered an IRA for purposes of PTE 97-11. |
|
03/06/1998
3(2) |
Samuel Arthur Butts III |
Whether the UT Medical Group, Inc. Key Employee Incentive Plan should be considered a “bonus program” rather than a "pension plan" under ERISA section 3(2)(A). |
|
01/21/1998
3(1) |
Mr. Mark W. Kunst |
Whether a proposed grant from the National Distribution Pipeline Industry Communications and Productivity Fund (Pipeline Fund) to a training fund for Union members would, render the Pipeline Fund an employee welfare benefit plan under ERISA section 3(1). |
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
11/07/1997
3(32) |
Mr. Richard J. Tuggle, Jr. |
Whether the Beaufort County Hospital Association, Inc. Employees' Pension Plan is a “governmental plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(32), and therefore excepted from ERISA Title I by section 4(b)(1). |
|
10/24/1997
407(d)(5) 407(f)(1) |
Mr. Larry E. Shapiro |
Whether a redemption or conversion of the same class of publicly-traded preferred stock that is held by a defined benefit plan by holders other than the plan would trigger the application of the ownership limits in ERISA section 407(f)(1). |
|
09/30/1997
408(b)(5) |
Mr. Paul D. Brink |
Whether an arrangement between Dorinco Reinsurance Company, an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Dow Chemical Company, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to jointly insure certain employee benefit plans covering employees of Dow and its affiliates is exempt from ERISA's prohibited transaction provisions by section 408(b)(5). |
|
09/26/1997
408(b)(2) |
Mr. Robert D. Alin, Esq. |
Regarding the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA section 406 and Internal Revenue Code section 4975 to certain proposed transactions by the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund, a multiple employer defined benefit pension plan seeking to establish and operate a for-profit plan-owned entity called Pentegra. |
|
09/15/1997
3(33) |
Mr. I. Lee Falk |
Whether employee benefit plans established and maintained by Albright Care Services are "church plans" within the meaning of ERISA section 3(33) and therefore exempt from coverage by ERISA section 4(b)(2). |
|
09/10/1997
4(b)(3) 514 |
Ms. Robin S. Lazarow |
Whether ERISA section 4(b)(3), which excludes from ERISA plans that are maintained solely to comply with state-mandated disability benefits, would apply to a disability benefits program offered by the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities in New Jersey to its members for their employees. |
|
09/08/1997
3(32) 4(b)(1) |
Ms. Kathleen M. Phillips |
Whether the Miami Beach Fraternal Order of Police Insurance Trust Fund, a health and life insurance arrangement for actively employed or retired police officers of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, is a "governmental plan," as defined in ERISA section 3(32) and, thus, excluded from ERISA coverage by ERISA section 4(b)(1). |