Advisory Opinions
Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1. The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.
| AO/ Date/ Reference | Recipient | Description of Request |
|---|---|---|
|
08/24/1993
103 |
Mr. Frederick W. Rumack |
In preparing an annual report for a defined benefit pension plan (Plan) subject to Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), what is the proper disclosure of information relating to assets held in an insurance company separate account established pursuant to a specific group annuity contract to provide benefit payments under the Plan. Specifically, what are the plan's annual reporting requirements with respect to the plan's statement of assets and liabilities, the Schedule A for the Contract, and the plan's Schedule B. |
|
08/03/1993
103(a)(3) |
Mr. Richard Bentley |
Whether the term "similar institution," as used in 29 C.F.R. § 2520.103-8, includes securities brokerage firms. |
|
07/16/1993
3(1) |
Mr. William J. Bernstein |
Whether the Short-Term Disability Income Plan for Non-Exempt Employees of The Coca-Cola Company is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of Title I of ERISA. |
|
05/28/1993
3(40) 514(b)(6) |
Mr. James P. Harrington, Jr. |
Whether the Western Growers Assurance Trust (WGAT) is a multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA) within the meaning of section 3(40) of Title I of ERISA and therefore subject under section 514(b)(6) of that title to applicable state insurance regulation. |
|
05/28/1993
403(d)(2) 406(b)(2) |
Melvin H. Pizer |
Addresses several questions on the application of the fiduciary responsibility provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to the termination and proposed transfer of the excess funds of one employee welfare benefit plan to another employee welfare benefit plan where both plans are jointly-administered, labor management trust funds established under collective bargaining agreements pursuant to section 302(c) of the Labor Management Relations Act. |
|
07/07/1993
3(40) 514(b) |
Mr. Alfred W. Gross |
Whether the American Fidelity Trust is a multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA) within the meaning of section 3(40) of Title I of ERISA and, therefore, subject to applicable state insurance regulations. |
|
05/18/1993
406(b)(2) |
Robert M. Archer, Esq. |
Addresses questions on the application of the fiduciary responsibility provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to the termination and proposed transfer of the excess funds of one employee welfare benefit plan to a related employee welfare benefit plan where both are jointly-administered, labor-management trust funds established under collective bargaining agreements pursuant to section 302(c) of the Labor Management Relations Act. |
|
05/18/1993
406(b)(2) |
Mr. Randall G. Simpson |
Addresses questions on the application of the fiduciary responsibility provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to the termination and transfer of excess funds of the Alaska Laborers-Employers Legal Services Fund to the Alaska Laborers & Construction Industry Health & Security Fund where both are jointly-administered, labor management trust funds established under collective bargaining agreements. |
|
05/05/1993
2510.3-101 |
Mr. John Vine |
Whether the assets of a trust established by an employer to set aside a portion of its general assets as a potential source of premium payments for health insurance held by an ERISA plan would constitute assets of the plan. |
|
04/27/1993
PTE 77-4 |
Fred R. Green, Esq. |
The application of Prohibited Transaction Exemption 77-4 (PTE 77-4) regarding the Frank Russell Trust Company and its affiliates. Specifically, whether Frank Russell Investment Management Company’s waiver of the investment advisory fee, otherwise payable by the Plans to Frank Russell Group in connection with the investment of plan assets in the Funds, complies with the requirements of paragraph (c) of section II of PTE 77-4. Whether paragraphs (d), (e) and (f) of section II of PTE 77-4 require written disclosure and approval of fees paid to parties unrelated to Frank Russell Investment Management Company, or any affiliate, with respect to the investment of plan assets in the Funds. Whether PTE 77-4 provides relief for the purchase or sale of shares of the Funds subsequent to the approval by a Plan fiduciary, independent of and unrelated to Frank Russell Trust Company, of a program for the purchase or sale of shares in the Funds, without prior approval of each such purchase or sale by the independent Plan fiduciary. |