Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

1994
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
03/14/1994
3(1)
3(5)
514(b)(6)(D)

Mr. Robert R. Googins 
Commissioner of Insurance
P.O. Box 816
Hartford, CT 06142-0816

Whether an employee benefit arrangement sponsored by the United Service Association for Health Care (USA) and seven trusts established under the arrangement constitute "employee welfare benefit plans" within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA and whether they are "fully insured" within the meaning of section 514(b)(6)(D) of ERISA.

03/08/1994
3(33)
4(b)(2)

Mr. John P. Gallagher
Schubert, Bellwoar, Mallon & Walheim
1400 Two Penn Center Plaza 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-1890

Whether benefit arrangements for employees of the Sacred Heart Manor in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, a nursing home of the Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm are church plans within the meaning of section 3(33) of Title I of ERISA.

03/08/1994
3(33)
4(b)(2)

Mr. Vincent P. Haley 
Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis
1600 Market Street, Suite 3600
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Whether benefit arrangements for employees of certain hospitals and other institutions of the Religious Sisters of Mercy are church plans within the meaning of section 3(33) of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

02/17/1994
3(33)
4(b)(2)

Mr. Robert L. Abramowitz
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
2000 One Logan Square 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-6993

Whether benefit arrangements that twelve institutions of the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia establish and maintain for their employees are church plans within the meaning of section 3(33) of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

02/17/1994
3(32)
4(b)(1)

Mr. John R. Whitehurst II
Porter & Porter
2100 Central Trust Tower
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Whether the Addison Community Hospital Employee Pension Plan is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32) of Title I of ERISA and thus excluded by section 4(b)(1) from coverage by the requirements of Title I of ERISA.

02/14/1994
3(32)
4(b)(1)

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Ms. Carol V. Calhoun
1800 M Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20036

Whether the District of Columbia Bar Deferred Compensation Plan, administered by the D.C. Bar is a "governmental plan" within the meaning of section 3(32) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").

02/02/1994
3(32)
4(b)(1)

Ms. Naomi H. Truman 
General Counsel
Housing Authority of the Birmingham District
1826 3rd Avenue, South
P. O. Box 55906
Birmingham, Alabama 35255-5906

Whether the Housing Authority of the Birmingham District Money Purchase Pension Plan established by the Housing Authority of the Birmingham District is a "governmental plan" within the meaning of section 3(32) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").

1993
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
12/23/1993
408(b)(3)

Ms. Roberta Casper Watson
Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf,
Barkin, Frye & O'Neill
Attorneys at Law
2700 Barnett Plaza
101 East Kennedy Blvd.
P. O. Box 1102
Tampa, FL 33601-1102

Whether proceeds received from the sale of stock from an employee stock ownership plan acquired with a loan which is exempt under section 408(b)(3) may be used to repay the loan if there is no formal pledge of the stock as security for the loan. Whether such action violates the general fiduciary provisions of ERISA.

12/16/1993
3(1)

Mr. M. Lee Price 
Hader, Price, Rinehart & Robblee 
1620 Metropolitan Park Building 
1100 Olive Way 
Seattle, Washington 98101

Whether the Labor-Management Cooperation Trust, which was established in accordance with the Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978 by the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry, Local Union 598, AFL-CIO and the employers that are signatories to the Local 598 Collective Bargaining Agreement, as revised December 1991, is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of Title I of ERISA. Specifically, whether the revised Trust Agreement’s purpose to provide benefits described in section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 falls within the meaning of section 3(1) of Title I of ERISA.

12/16/1993
4975 (c )(1)

Mr. Roberto Faith
1101 S.W. 102 Court
Miami, Florida 33174

Whether the proposed purchase and lease-back of a tax-exempt school's land and building by a self-directed Individual Retirement Account (IRA) that is an employee pension benefit plan would result in a prohibited transaction under section 4975 of the Code. Whether the prohibited transaction would result in a deemed distribution from the IRA under section 408(e)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.