Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC)

FY 2005 2nd Quarter LPD Report for Departments

LPD: FY 2003 Baseline; FY 2005 SHARE Performance Target; 2nd Quarter FY 2005; Cumulative FY 2005 with comparison to Target

Executive Branch

FY2003 Baseline

FY2005 Target

FY2005 2nd Qtr Performance

FY2005 Cumulative LPD

Cumulative LPD vs 2005 Target

Departments

 

 

 

 

 

Department of Agriculture

66.3

65.0

40.4

46.6

-28.3%

Agricultural Marketing Service

 

 

45.2

51.3

 

Agricultural Research Service

 

 

18.0

25.8

 

Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service

 

 

33.2

39.3

 

Farm Service Agency

 

 

13.6

21.4

 

Food & Nutrition Service

 

 

0.6

6.1

 

Food Safety Inspection Service

 

 

138.2

160.9

 

Forest Service

 

 

43.1

41.7

 

Grain Inspectors, Packers & Stockyards Admin

 

 

105.5

124.7

 

Natural Resources Conservation Service

 

 

10.0

18.7

 

Rural Housing Service

 

 

6.7

7.8

 

Department of Air Force

41.3

40.5

27.1

32.3

-20.2%

Department of the Army

41.0

40.2

31.4

35.3

-12.2%

Corps of Engineers

 

 

34.3

34.2

 

Department of Commerce

19.8

19.4

20.0

22.8

17.6%

Bureau of the Census

 

 

42.0

39.8

 

National Institute of Standards & Technology

 

 

19.9

23.7

 

National Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin

 

 

12.7

20.4

 

Department of Defense

51.5

50.0

28.1

35.0

-30.0%

Defense Commissary Agency

 

 

48.7

62.1

 

Defense Contract Audit Agency

 

 

9.3

11.2

 

Defense Contract Management Agency

 

 

16.6

19.3

 

Defense Finance & Accounting Service

 

 

26.1

26.5

 

Defense Logistics Agency

 

 

40.9

50.6

 

Other Defense Agencies

 

 

16.1

22.3

 

  • Department-level performance comprises all relevant agencies and bureaus, including those broken out separately by name

  • The Kennedy Center and National Gallery of Art are reported under Smithsonian Institute, but are not included in the Smithsonian's overall performance

  • Agencies listed in red did not provide 2nd Quarter COP data so performance is estimated

  • Agencies listed with stars showed actual 2nd Quarter reductions of 10% or better compared to baseline

  • Cumulative variance against SHARE target is calculated as follows: [(Cum LPD / Avg Employment) * 200 - FY2005 Target] / FY2005 Target

  • Cumulative variance is not available if target was not established

Return to SHARE Home Page

Click on the link to see other Departments 2 | 3