Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

1980
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
11/13/1980
3(1)
3(2)

Mr. Ronald s. Rizzo
Kindel & Anderson
Twenty-sixth Floor
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071

Whether the proposed Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan) of Applied Magnetics Corporation (the Company) is an employee benefit plan covered by ERISA title I.

11/03/1980
104

Mr. Charles H. Harris
Charles H. Harris & Associates, Inc.
1151 W. Robinhood Drive, Suite 12B
Stockton, California 95207

Whether the limited exemption set forth in regulation 29 C.F.R. §2520.104-21 for certain group insurance arrangements is available with respect to the San Joaquin Employers Insurance Trust (SJET).

11/03/1980
3(1)
3(4)

Mr. Dan S. Brandenburg
Mercier, Sanders, Baker & Schnabel, P.C.
Suite 800
730 Fifteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005

Whether the WAEPA Group Insurance Plan (the Program) is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA.

10/28/1980
407(d)(3)

Mr. William A. Kelley, Jr.
Dechert, Price & Rhoads
3400 Centre Square West
1500 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Whether the purchase by the Plan of Vipond & Vipond, Inc. common stock would not violate the prohibited transaction rules of section 406 of ERISA by reason of the statutory exemption contained in section 408(e).

10/22/1980
4(b)

Mr. Richard H. Fay
Reed Smith Shaw & McClay
1150 Connecticut Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20036

Whether the Rockwell International Overseas Corporation International Pension Plan (the Plan) is a plan maintained outside the United States primarily for persons substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens within the meaning of ERISA section 4(b)(4) and thus is not covered by title I of ERISA.

10/09/1980
514(a)

Mr. Richard D. Sommers
Schwartz, Steinsapir, Dohrmann & Krepack
Two Century Plaza
Suite 1900
2049 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067

Whether the State of California's Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (the "California Act") is preempted under ERISA section 514R with respect to the Retail Clerks Unions and Food Employers Benefit Fund, the General Sales Employer-Retail Clerks Unions Supplementary Trust Fund and the Southern California Drug Benefit Fund (the "Funds") each of which is a multi-employer trust fund established pursuant to section 302 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §186 and each of which is an employee welfare benefit plan as defined in section 3(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").

10/01/1980
408(c )(2)

Mr. Martin R. Ganzglass
Delson & Gordon
1900 L Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036

Whether the Graphic Arts International Union Supplemental Retirement and Disability Fund (the Fund) may pay its trustees a per diem allowance under section 408(c)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) in lieu of reimbursing the trustees for actual expenses incurred in the performance of their duties for the plan.

10/01/1980
407(d)(3)

Louise A. Jackson, Esquire
Marshall, Melhorn, Cole, Hummer & Spitzer
Fourteenth Floor
National Bank Building
Toledo, Ohio 43604

Whether the proposed sale of six retail shoe stores by Kobacker Stores, Inc. (Kobacker), the Plan sponsor, to the Plan and the subsequent leaseback of those stores by the Plan to Kobacker would be exempt from the prohibited transactions provisions of sections 406(a) and 407(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by virtue of section 408(e) of ERISA.

09/03/1980
103

Mr. Daniel J. Robins
Vice President and Secretary
National Health and Welfare Retirement Association, Inc.
360 Park Avenue South
New York, New York 10010

Whether the National Health and Welfare Retirement Association (NHWRA) is an "insurance company" within the meaning of the definition of the term "investment manager" in section 3(38) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and an insurance carrier regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a State agency within the meaning of 29 CFR §2520.103-4 (which provides an exemption from certain annual reporting requirements for assets held in an insurance company pooled separate account).

09/23/1980
407

Mr. Christopher J. Sues
Shea & Gould
330 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017

Whether the common stock of Diamond would constitute a "qualifying employer security" within the meaning of ERISA section 407(d) with respect to a savings and stock bonus plan which Escher proposes to adopt for its employees.