Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

1982
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
07/28/1982
414

Mr. Michael I. Lew
Coopers & Lybrand
222 South Riverside Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60606

Whether the proposed sale of the trademarks and stock of Empro Intangibles, Inc., wholly owned by the trustees of the plan and used only as a vehicle to hold the trademarks, is a transaction described in section 414(c)(3) of ERISA and, therefore, is exempt from the prohibited transaction provisions of sections 406 and 407 of ERISA and section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Whether the procedure of engaging a law firm to value the assets and negotiate the transaction on behalf of the Plan is an acceptable method for determining the fair market value of the assets in question and for effecting the transaction.

07/26/1982
3(1)
3(2)

Mr. Peter J. Pestillo
Vice President-Labor Relations
Ford Motor Company
The American Road
Dearborn, Michigan 48121

Whether the Guaranteed Income Stream Benefit Program, part of the collective bargaining agreement between Ford Motor Company and the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (the UAW), is an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of title I of ERISA and not an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of title I of ERISA.

07/22/1982
3(4)

Bruce A. Bordine, Trustee
Bordine's Better Blooms, Inc.
1835 S. Rochester Road
Rochester, Michigan 48063

Whether the Bordine's Better Blooms Voluntary Employee Benefit Trust qualifies for the limited exemption under Department of Labor regulation 29 C.F.R §2520.104-20, regarding the filing of Forms 5500 for employee welfare benefit plans with fewer than 100 participants.

07/21/1982
104(b)(4)

Mr. Albert J. Yonke
Yonke, Shackelford & Arnold, P.C.
1710 Traders Bank Building
1125 Grand Avenue
Kansas City, Missouri 64106

Whether the Boards of Trustees of the Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund and Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund or the plan administrator are not required by section 104(b)(4) of ERISA or 29 CFR §2520.102-3(t)(2) to make available, upon written request of a participant, past participant or beneficiary, copies of minutes of the regular and/or special meetings of the Boards of Trustees or the Committee meetings of said Boards.

07/20/1982
403(c )(1)
404(a)(1)
406(a)
406(b)(2)

Mr. Robert A. Georgine
National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans
Suite 603
815 Sixteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006

Whether the following acts or transactions are prohibited by section 406 of ERISA:

  1. Direct reporting by a multiemployer plan, or by an insurance company or other party making payments on behalf of the plan, to comply with section 6051(f) of the Code.
  2. Payment by a multiemployer plan, or by an insurance company or other party making payments on behalf of the plan, of the employer's portion of the FICA taxes on sick pay.
  3. Participation by the employer-appointed trustees in implementing either of the above.
  4. Payment by a multiemployer plan of the employee's portion of the FICA taxes on sick pay, through either the direct or the indirect method as described above.
07/14/1982
3(14)
3(14)(G)
3(21)(A)
401(b)
406(a)
406(b)
408(b)(2)
408(c )(2)

Mr. Brent R. Armstrong, Esquire
Suitter, Axland & Armstrong
Seventh Floor
Clark Learning Office Center
175 South West Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101

Whether the formation and operation of Pension Equity Growth Trust, a pooled trust of the type described in Revenue Ruling 81-100 to provide qualified employee benefit plans with a vehicle for pooling a portion of their assets for investments in real estate, real estate loans and, to some extent, in government securities, raises prohibited transactions under ERISA.

07/07/1982
403

James D. Hutchinson, Esquire
Steptoe & Johnson
1250 Connecticut Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20036

Whether Analytic, a registered investment adviser and a fiduciary of the Fund, or any other person selected as investment manager for the Fund, would be considered an "investment manager," as defined in section 3(38) of ERISA, with respect to each employee benefit plan participating in the Fund. Whether a named fiduciary of a plan participating in the Fund would be considered to have delegated authority to the Fund's investment manager to manage, acquire, or dispose of plan assets in accordance with section 403(a)(2) of ERISA.

07/02/1982
3(1)
3(2)

Mr. Ralph O. Winger
Cahill Gordon & Reindel
Eighty Pine Street
New York, New York 10005

Whether the Forest Oil Corporation and Forest Oil of Canada, Ltd. Division Overriding Royalty Bonus Plan is an employee benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(3) and thus is covered by ERISA title I.

06/21/1982

Mr. William D. Hyatt
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
c/o Miami Strike Force
77 South East 5th Street, Suite 401
Miami, Florida 33131

Whether the Massachusetts Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, the Rhode Island Laborers Health and Welfare Heavy Construction Trust Fund, the Rhode Island Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, and the Broward County Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Plans) are covered by ERISA.

06/16/1982
3(2)

Mr. Garry P. Jerome
Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz
123 South Broad Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19109

Whether the individual retirement account (IRA) payroll deduction program of the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) would constitute an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(2) of ERISA.