Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

1988
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
12/23/1988
4975

Mr. Joseph B. Hurst, Jr.
Friday, Eldredge & Clark
2000 First Commercial Building
Little Rock, AR 72201

Whether a $500.000 loan from an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) established by Thomas E. Darragh, a current employee, shareholder, and member of the Board of Directors, to Darragh Company would violate section 4975(c)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

12/09/1988

Mr. Edwin J. Guillot, Jr.
McConnell Valdes Kelley Sifre Griggs & Ruiz-Suria
G.P.O. Box 4225
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936

Whether Section 5 of Puerto Rico Act No. 17 of April 17, 1931 is preempted under the preemption provisions of section 514 of title I of ERISA insofar as Section 5 limits or prohibits payroll deductions for the purpose of funding the Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan of The First Boston Corporation, for the benefit of their employees performing services in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

12/19/1988
403( c)
404(a)(1)

Mr. Gregory Ridella
Chrysler Corporation
P.O. Box 1919
Detroit, MI 48288

Whether a certain understanding contained in a Letter Agreement between the Chrysler Corporation and the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, with respect to Chrysler's Pension Fund does not violate the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA. The Letter Agreement is substantially similar to one entered into in 1979 by Chrysler and the UAW.

12/05/1988
3(32)
4(b)(1)

Mr. Timothy A. Bush
Sirote, Permutt, McDermott, Slepian,
Friend, Friedman, Held & Apolinsky, P.C.
2222 Arlington Avenue South
Post Office Box 55727
Birmingham, Alabama 35255

Whether the Shelby County Hospital Board Defined Benefit Pension Plan of the Shelby Medical Center is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32) of title I of ERISA and thus excepted from ERISA title I requirements pursuant to section 4(b)(1) of ERISA.

09/28/1988
403(c )(1)
404(a)

Linda G. O'Brien, Esq.
Xerox Corporation
P.O. Box 1600
Stamford, Connecticut 06904

Whether a proposed merger of the Xerox Corporation’s Long-Term Disability Income Plan and Medical Care Plan would violate sections 403(c)(1), 404(a), 406(a)(1)(D), and 406(b)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").

08/29/1988
408(c )(2)

Paul D. Myrick, Esq.
McRight, Jackson, Myrick & Moore
1100 First Alabama Bank Building
Mobile, AL 36602

Whether a plan trustee of the A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Pension and Welfare Plans, who is a full-time employee of an employer that no longer makes contributions to the Plans on behalf of its employees, may receive compensation from the Plans for services performed as trustee.

08/24/1988
3(32)
4(b)(1)

Ms. Peggy O. Haines
Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones
207 Piedmont Avenue
Post Office Box 2009
Bristol, Virginia 24203

Whether the money purchase plan of the Lee County Public Schools is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 3(32) of title I of ERISA and is therefore excluded from coverage under that title by section 4(b)(1) of ERISA.

08/17/1988
406(b)
408(b)(8)

Mr. Donald S. Kohla
King & Spalding
2500 Trust Company Tower
Atlanta, GA 30303

Whether a bank in the SunTrust system would not violate section 406(b) of ERISA by investing the assets of employee benefit plans for which SunTrust Banks, Inc. is a fiduciary in a common trust fund maintained by such bank or any other bank in the SunTrust system.

08/12/1988
3(1)

Mr. J. Paul Jacobson
Quarles & Brady
411 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

Whether the Dependent Care Assistance Plan of Tropical Plant Rentals, Inc. constitutes an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of section 3(1) of ERISA.

04/15/1988
IRC 408(A)

Mr. Lloyd V. Crawford
Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett
184 Commerce Street
Montgomery, AL 36104

Whether the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 applies to the purchases of stock of the parent of the Bank of Prattville by various self-directed individual retirement accounts (IRAs) sponsored by the Bank.