Prohibited Persons

Last Updated: February 2025

  1. Background. There are two types of Prohibited Persons(1) investigations:
    1. Proactive investigations into people who are, or are reasonably believed to be, currently disqualified under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA); and
    2. Responses to debarred persons who are seeking relief from the prohibitions of ERISA Section 411.
  2. Proactive Prohibited Persons Investigations. EBSA may investigate people it believes are disqualified under ERISA Section 411. The purpose of the investigation may be to confirm that a person is complying with the debarment or because EBSA suspects a person is violating the ERISA’s statutory bar.
  3. Purpose. EBSA is responsible for ensuring disqualified parties do not serve in positions or capacities prohibited under the statute. EBSA conducts proactive investigations to monitor the employment status of disqualified persons. When an initial investigation reveals that a debarred person is serving in a prohibited capacity, EBSA will seek to have the person vacate the prohibited position or role. However, if EBSA already has an open criminal investigation involving the disqualified person, the Regional Office (RO) should first speak with the prosecutor before requesting the person step down. EBSA may remove the person through either a civil injunction or criminal prosecution.
  4. Source of Cases. Case identification includes reviewing available data, conviction records, referrals, media reports or other methods. Whether these initial investigations will lead to criminal investigations will depend on the circumstances of the subjects of the inquiries.
  5. Case Opening. The RO will open a Prohibited Persons(2) investigation as a Program 47 to examine the employment status of a disqualified person. Once the investigation is open, the Investigator/Auditor should send the disqualified person an opening letter. See Figure 1.
  6. Conducting the Investigation.

    1. STEP 1 – Notice of Debarment. In an open case predicated upon a prior EBSA investigation, the first step is to determine whether there was notification to the subject of their statutory disqualification.

      The preferred method of delivery is by hand directly to the person. If hand delivery is not cost effective, then following methods are acceptable:

      1. Certified mail return receipt requested;
      2. To the convicted person’s attorney by certified mail return receipt;

      3. By other means that can be clearly documented.

        Check the prior case file to determine whether the subject received a debarment letter. If there is no evidence in the case file confirming that the subject received a debarment letter, send the subject a new debarment letter. See EM section on Criminal Investigations Program, paragraph 26 Figure 6, for a sample debarment letter and for more information on debarment letters. Place copies of the letter and proof of delivery and receipt in both the current and original case file.

        If another agency provided the Prohibited Person with a debarment letter, the RO should request a copy for its records. If EBSA is not able to obtain a copy, the RO will deliver a separate debarment letter to the defendant.

    2. STEP 2 – Employment Status. The next step is to confirm the subject's recent and current employment to determine whether ERISA prohibits such employment. If Investigators/Auditors are uncertain as to whether ERISA bars a particular employment or service, the Investigators/Auditors will request guidance from the Office of Enforcement's (OE) Chief, Division of Criminal Investigations.

      Should an investigation reveal that a barred person is serving in a prohibited capacity, but the person was apparently unaware of their disqualification, the RO should deliver a debarment letter to the person and confirm receipt. This letter should explain the person’s prohibition from working in his or her present capacity.

      Because the disqualified persons may not serve in any prohibited capacity, the Investigator/Auditor should promptly notify the employer of the disqualified person's status, when appropriate. If the person consequently files for relief from debarment, then the Investigator/Auditor should follow the steps set out in paragraph 9 through 15.

      If an investigation discloses that a person is serving in a prohibited capacity despite having been notified of their debarment, or simply refuses to depart from a prohibited capacity after being served with a debarment letter, the RO shall seek a civil injunction or open a criminal investigation, as appropriate.

      Whenever a Prohibited Persons investigation reveals that a disqualified person was serving in a prohibited capacity, the RO should consider opening an investigation on the related plan to determine plan harm. This is particularly appropriate if a disqualified person refuses to surrender their prohibited position or function.

  7. Preparation of Closing Report of Investigation. ROs will submit all Reports of Investigation (ROIs) under proactive investigations as closed reports modeled after Figure 2.

  8. Regional Director's Transmittal. If a civil injunction is sought, completed ROIs will be transmitted to the Office of the Solicitor (SOL), the Regional Office of the Solicitor (RSOL) or the Plan Benefits Security Division (PBSD) with a cover memorandum from the Regional Director (RD) setting forth the steps the Investigator/Auditor completed. The RO will direct a copy of the recommendation memorandum and the ROI, without exhibits, to OE (Chief, Division of Criminal Investigations). The RO should also provide copies of court filings by the Department and the plaintiff.

    If the disqualified person refuses to comply with the civil injunction, or if the evidence supports the person may have engaged in criminal activity while in the prohibited role, the RO should open a criminal investigation.

  9. Requests for Relief from Debarment. ERISA Section 411(a) establishes the procedures for seeking an exemption from the statutory prohibitions under ERISA.(3) EBSA has the authority to conduct investigations and to provide information at court hearings concerning requests for an exemption to ERISA Section 411.(4) Generally, SOL represents EBSA in such matters. Requests for reduction of the length of disability should be treated the same as a request for exemption.
  10. Purpose. When there is a request for EBSA to conduct an investigation related to a motion for relief from ERISA Section 411(a), the purpose of the investigation is to provide information to the court or parole commission, rather than to prove an ERISA violation. The investigation should seek aggravating or mitigating evidence with regard to the following three factors:
    1. The character and gravity of the disqualifying offense;
    2. The nature of the position for which the applicant is seeking an exemption; and
    3. The extent to which the applicant has rehabilitated to meet the standards of responsibility required.
  11. Source of Cases. Cases may be initiated when information is received pertaining to a request for relief.

  12. Case Opening. ROs will open an investigation upon receipt of a request for relief. In some instances, a case opening is unwarranted. For example, due to the minimal passage of time between a guilty plea or conviction and a request for reduction in the bar, or the shortness of time between a request and the sentencing date, the RO may not have new information to contribute. In such instances, opening a case is discretionary with the RD.

    In cases where a Prohibited Person is occupying a prohibited position, Investigators/Auditors should follow steps described under Proactive Prohibited Persons Investigations.

  13. Investigative Activity. A Prohibited Person Request for Relief investigation requires priority handling and close coordination among the RO, OE (Chief, Division of Criminal Investigations), SOL and the DOJ. In view of this, when the RO receives information that a request for remedial relief is being sought, an e-mail setting forth the relevant information should be directed to PBSD’s Associate Solicitor with a copy to the appropriate RSOL ERISA Counsel and OE (Chief, Division of Criminal Investigations). The e- mail should describe:

    1. The party seeking relief;
    2. The jurisdiction involved;
    3. The nature of the position for which relief is being sought;
    4. The crime which caused the bar; and
    5. Any other relevant information.

    There will be a determination of which SOL office (national or regional) will handle the matter.

    The investigation of an application before the Parole Commission focuses upon the verification of information that is required to be included in the application by regulations (Figure 3).(5)

    Investigations predicated on court filings should focus upon the three factors described in paragraph 10 above. The venue for these cases is United States district court, not the Parole Commission. Although a district court may choose to adopt certain Parole Commission procedures with respect to its determination, it is not subject to the regulations governing procedures before the Parole Commission. Further, investigations of cases filed in United States district court may have to address more than the three areas in which the Parole Commission was interested. Accordingly, the Investigator/Auditor should read the pleadings, address any issues raised, and verify any relevant factual assumptions.

  14. Preparation of Closed Report of Investigation. ROs will submit all ROIs under request for relief investigations as closed reports modeled after Figure 4.
  15. Regional Director's Transmittal. ROs will transmit all ROIs with a cover memorandum from the RD setting forth the RO's recommendation as to whether Department should oppose the motion (Figure 5). The RO should direct the ROI, exhibits, and recommendation memo to the appropriate SOL office. The RO should direct a copy of the recommendation memo and the ROI, without exhibits, to OE (Chief, Division of Criminal Investigations). The referral should also include copies of court filings by the Department and the plaintiff.

(Figure 1) Initial Contact Letter Draft Office Letterhead

Certified Mail No.
Return Receipt Requested

In reply, please refer to our file no. (47)

[Date]

[Subject]
[Subject's Address]

RE: Investigation pursuant to ERISA § 411

Dear [xxxx]:

The United States Department of Labor is responsible for the administration and enforcement of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Investigative authority is vested in the Secretary of Labor by ERISA §§ 504 and 506(b), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1134 and 1136(b), respectively.

Under ERISA § 411, persons who have been convicted of certain enumerated crimes are debarred for a period of thirteen (13) years from serving in various capacities related to employee benefit plans. Among the crimes requiring debarment is [xx U.S.C. § xxxx], of which you were convicted in [year]. The thirteen year debarment period begins on the later of the date of conviction or the end of any imprisonment that may have resulted from the conviction.

According to our records, your debarment period began on [date], which is [the date of your conviction] (or) [the date of your release from the imprisonment resulting from your conviction].

This office is conducting an investigation to determine your compliance with the bar imposed by ERISA § 411. In doing so, we hope to protect your privacy to the extent possible while fulfilling our responsibilities under the statute. Accordingly, we seek your voluntary cooperation with our inquiry. Specifically, we request that you promptly furnish the documentation listed in the attachment to this letter, and that you subsequently agree to be interviewed, possibly via telephone, regarding your employment history as it pertains to the § 411 bar. We may also request that, after you have had an opportunity to review a written summary of the information obtained in our investigation, you sign under oath a declaration that the information contained in the summary is correct.

If the information and documentation you provide is sufficient to establish your compliance with the bar, it may eliminate altogether our need to seek or to corroborate this information with third parties (e.g., employers, neighbors, etc.).

Attached to this letter is the documentation we request at this time. Please deliver these items to the undersigned within three weeks of your receipt of this letter. You may provide the documentation in paper form or electronically in PDF format.

Finally, we ask that you provide a telephone number and time of day when you would prefer that we call you, when necessary, to discuss this inquiry.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [tel. no.] or [email address]

Sincerely,
Case Investigator

Please Provide the Following Documentation as Discussed in the Accompanying Letter (Additional documentation may be required)

  1. Documents sufficient to establish your full name, date of birth, and Social Security Number
  2. Documents sufficient to establish your current home address and all prior home addresses dating back to the effective date of your debarment* but no more than 3 years
  3. Documents sufficient to establish the names and addresses of all current and former employers, including documents identifying all supervisors, dating back to the effective date of your debarment but no more than 3 years. Identify all periods of self-employment and unemployment. Account for all periods of time
  4. Copies of all federal tax returns dating back to the effective date of your debarment but no more than 3 years
  5. Copies of all Form W-2s and all employment-related Form 1099s dating back to the effective date of your debarment but no more than 3 years
  6. Copies of all employment contracts and personal service contracts dating back to the effective date of your debarment but no more than 3 years
  7. For each position or job held, provide the job title and a complete description of the work actually performed in the position or job. To the extent any work directly or indirectly involved any employee benefit plan, fully describe the exact nature of the work you performed with respect to the employee benefit plan

* This date is set forth in the accompanying letter.

(Figure 2) Report of Investigation U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration

This document is the property of the Employee Benefits Security Administration. It is not to be disclosed to unauthorized persons.

File No.

Subject: (Name and Address of Prohibited Person)

Date:

By: Investigator/Auditor
Approved by:

EIN/PN:
Status: Closed

  1. Predication - State the reasons for case opening and conducting the investigation.
  2. Issues and Findings - Cite the facts which show:
    1. Disqualifying Offense - Describe the offense for which the subject was convicted and consequently barred from employment in employee benefit plans under section 411 of ERISA.
    2. Notification of Disbarment - Describe any known notifications of disbarment, including proof of receipt. If the subject indicates non-receipt, describe the actions taken to officially notify the subject of debarment, including proof of receipt.
    3. Nature of Current Employment of Applicant - Include a description of any employment position. Be specific about all duties and authority for which the subject may be responsible as they relate to employee benefit plans. Provide sufficient facts showing that the employment was or was not prohibited.
    4. Actions Taken - In cases where prohibited employment is found, cite the facts showing that VC was achieved, if applicable, or that other dispositive action was taken
  3. Other Findings - This section can be used to present facts or any other investigative activity not previously mentioned.

[To be used at the discretion of the Regional Director] Distribution:
National Office __________________________________________________

(Figure 3) Part 4 – Procedure Governing Applications for Certificates of Exemption under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

  1. Definitions
  2. Who may apply for Certificate of Exemption
  3. Contents of application
  4. Supporting affidavit; additional information
  5. Character endorsements
  6. Institution of proceedings
  7. Notice of hearing; postponements
  8. Hearing
  9. Representations
  10. Waiver of oral hearing
  11. Appearance; testimony; cross examination
  12. Evidence which may be excluded
  13. Record of decision. Receipt of documents comprising record; timing and extension
  14. Administrative law judge's recommended decision; exceptions thereto; oral argument before Commission
  15. Certificate of Exemption
  16. Rejection of application
  17. Availability of decisions

Authority: Secs. 504, 606, Stat. 536, 540 (29 U.S.C. 504, 526): and Secs. 411, 507A. 88 Stat. 887, 894, (29 U.S.C. 1111, 1137).
Source: 44 FR 6890, Feb. 2, 1979, unless otherwise noted.
Cross Reference: For Organization Statement, U.S. Parole Commission, see Subpart V of Part O of this chapter.

§ 4.1 Definitions

As used in this part:

  1. Labor Act means the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (73 Sta. 519).
  2. Pension Act means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 94- 406)(88 Sta. 829)
  3. Act means both of the above statutes.
  4. Commission means the United States Parole Commission.
  5. Secretary means the Secretary of Labor or his designee.
  6. For proceeding under the "Labor Act"
    1. Employer means the labor organization or person engaged in an industry or activity affecting commerce, or group or association of employers dealing with any labor organization, which an applicant under Section 4.2 desires to serve in a capacity for which he is ineligible under section 504(a) of the "Labor Act".
    2. All other terms used in this part shall have the same meaning as identical or comparable terms when those terms are used in the "Labor Act".
  7. For proceedings under the "Pension Act"
    1. Employer means the employee benefit plan with which an applicant under § 4.2 desires to serve in a capacity for which he is ineligible under section 411(a) of the "Pension Act" (29 U.S.C. section 1111).
    2. All other terms used in this part shall have the same meaning as identical or comparable terms when those terms are used in the "Pension Act".

§ 4.2 Who may apply for Certificate of Exemption

Any person who has been convicted of any of the crimes enumerated in section 504(a) of the "Labor Act" whose service, present or prospective, as described in that section because of such a conviction or a prison term resulting therefrom; or any person who has been convicted of any of the crimes enumerated in section 411(a) of the "Pension Act" (29 U.S.C. section 1111) whose service, present or prospective, as described in that section is or would be prohibited by that section because of such a conviction or a prison term resulting therefrom, may apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Exemption from such a prohibition under the applicable Act.

§ 4.3 Contents of applications

A person applying for a Certificate of Exemption shall file with the Office of General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission, 5500 Friendship Boulevard, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815-7286, a signed application under oath, in seven copies, which shall set forth clearly and completely the following information:

  1. The name and address of the applicant and any other names used by the applicant and dates of such use.
  2. A statement of all convictions and imprisonments, which prohibit the applicant's service under the provisions of the applicable Act.
  3. Whether any citizenship rights were revoked as a result of conviction or imprisonment and if so the name of the court and date of judgment thereof and the extent to which such rights have been restored.
  4. The name and location of the employer and a description of the office or paid position, including the duties thereof, for which a Certificate of Exemption is ought.
  5. A full explanation of the reasons or grounds relied upon to establish that the applicant's service in the office or employment for which a Certificate of Exemption is sought would not be contrary to the purposes of the applicable Act.
  6. A statement that the applicant does not, for the purpose of the proceeding, contest the validity of any conviction.

(28 U.S.C. 509 and 510, 5 U.S.C. 301)
(44 FR 6890, Feb. 2, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 52354, Oct. 27, 1981)

§ 4.4 Supporting affidavit; additional information

  1. Each application filed with the Commission must be accompanied by a signed affidavit, in 7 copies, setting forth the following concerning the personal history of the applicant:
    1. Place and date of birth. If the applicant was not born in the United States, the time of first entry and port of entry, whether he/she is a citizen of the United States, and if naturalized, when, where and how he/she became naturalized and the number of his Certificate of Naturalization.
    2. Extent of education, including names of schools attended.
    3. History of marital and family status, including a statement as to whether any relatives by blood or marriage are currently serving in any capacity with an employee benefit plan, or labor organization, group or association of employers dealing with labor organizations or industrial labor relations group, or currently advising or representing any employer with respect to employee organizing concerted activities or collective bargaining activities.
    4. Present employment, including office or offices held with a description of the duties thereof.
    5. History of employment, including military service, in chronological order.
    6. Licenses held at the present or at any time in the past five years, to possess or carry firearms.
    7. Veterans' Administration claims number and regional office handling claim, if any.
    8. A listing (not including traffic offenses for which a fine of not more than $25 was forfeited) by date and place of all arrests, convictions for felonies, misdemeanors, or offenses and all imprisonment or jail terms resulting therefrom, together with a statement of the circumstances of each violation which led to arrest of conviction.
    9. Whether applicant was ever on probation or parole, and if so the names of the courts by which convicted and the dates of conviction.
    10. Names and location of all employee benefit plans, labor organizations or employer groups with which the applicant has ever been associated or employed, and all employers or employee benefit plans which he has advised or represented concerning employee organizing, concerted activities, or collective bargaining activities together with a description of the duties performed in each such employment or association.
    11. A statement of applicant's net worth, including all assets held by him or in the names of others for him, the amount of each liability owed by him or by him together with any other person and the amount and source of all income during the immediately preceding five calendar years plus income to date of application.
    12. Any other information that the applicant feels will assist the Commission in making its determination.
  2. The Commission may require of the applicant such additional information as it deems appropriate for the proper consideration and disposition of his application.

§ 4.5 Character endorsements

Each application filed with the Commission must be accompanied by letters or other forms of statement (in three copies) from six persons addressed to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, attesting to the character and reputation of the applicant. The statement as to character shall indicate the length of time the writer has known applicant, and shall describe applicant's character traits as they relate to the position for which the exemption is sought and the duties and responsibilities thereof. The statement as to reputation shall attest to applicant's reputation in his community or in his circle of business or social acquaintances. Each letter or other form of statement shall indicate that it has been submitted in compliance with procedures under the respective Act and that applicant has informed the writer of the factual basis of his application. The persons submitting letters or other forms of statement shall not include relatives by blood or marriage, prospective employers, or persons serving in any official capacity with an employee benefit plan, labor organization, group or association of employers dealing with labor organizations or industrial labor relations groups.

§ 4.6 Institution of proceedings

All applications and supporting documents received by the Commission shall be reviewed for completeness by the Office of General Counsel of the Parole Commission and, if complete and fully in compliance with the regulations of this part, the Office of General Counsel shall accept them for filing. Applicant and/or his representative will be notified by the Office of General Counsel of any deficiency in the application and supporting documents. The amount of time allowed for deficiencies to be remedied will be specified in said notice. In the event such deficiencies are not remedied within the specified period or any extension thereof, granted after application to the Commission in writing within the specified period, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn and notice thereof shall be given to applicant.

§ 4.7 Notice of hearing postponements

Upon the filing of an application, the Commission shall: (a) Set the application for a hearing on a date within a reasonable time after its filing and notify the applicant of such date by certified mail; (b) Give notice, as required by the respective Act, to the appropriate State, County or Federal prosecuting officials in the jurisdiction or jurisdiction in which the applicant was convicted that an application for a Certificate of Exemption has been filed and the date for hearing thereon; and (c) Notify the Secretary that an application has been filed and the date for hearing thereon and furnish him copies of the application and all supporting documents. Any party may request a postponement of a hearing date in writing from the Office of General Counsel at any time prior to ten (10) days before the scheduled hearing. No request for postponement other than the first for any party will be considered unless a showing is made of cause entirely beyond the control of the requester. The granting of such requests will be within the discretion of the Commission. In the event of a failure to appear on the hearing date as originally scheduled or extended, the absent party will be deemed to have waived his right to a hearing. The hearing will be conducted with the parties present participating and documentation, if any, of the absent party entered into the record.

§ 4.8 Hearing

The hearing on the application shall be held at the offices of the Commission in Washington, D.C., or elsewhere as the Commission may direct. The hearing shall be held before the Commission, before one or more Commissioners, or before one or more administrative law judges appointed as provided by section 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 3105) as the Commission by order shall determine. Hearings shall be conducted in accordance with sections 7 and 8 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 556, 557).

§ 4.9 Representation

The applicant may be represented before the Commission by any person who is a member in good standing of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States or of the highest court of any State or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia and who is not under any order of any court suspending, enjoining, restraining or disbarring him from, or otherwise restricting him in, the practice of law. Whenever a person acting in a representative capacity appears in person or signs a paper in practice before the Commission, his personal appearance or signature shall constitute a representation to the Commission that under the provisions of this part and applicable law he is authorized and qualified to represent the particular person in whose behalf he acts. Further proof of a person's authority to act in a representative capacity may be required. When any applicant is represented by an attorney at law, any notice or other written communication required or permitted to be given to or by such applicant shall be given to or by such attorney. If an applicant is represented by more than one attorney, service by or upon any one of such attorneys shall be sufficient.

§ 4.10 Waiver of oral hearing

The Commission upon receipt of a statement from the Secretary that he does not object, and in the absence of any request for oral hearing from the others to whom notice has been sent pursuant to §4.7 may grant an application without receiving oral testimony with respect to it.

§ 4.11 Appearance; testimony; cross-examination

  1. The applicant shall appear and, except as otherwise provided in §4.10, shall testify at the hearing and may cross-examine witnesses.
  2. The Secretary and other to whom notice has been sent pursuant to §4.7 shall be afforded an opportunity to appear and present evidence and cross-examine witnesses, at any hearing.
  3. At the discretion of the Commission or presiding officer, other witnesses may testify at the hearing.

§ 4.12 Evidence which may be excluded

The Commission or officer presiding at the hearing may exclude irrelevant, untimely, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence.

§ 4.13 Record for decision, receipt of documents comprising record; timing and extension

  1. The application and all supporting documents, the transcript of the testimony and oral argument at the hearing, together with any exhibits received and other documents filed pursuant to these procedures and/or the Administrative Procedures Act shall be made parts of the record for decision.
  2. At the conclusion of the hearing the presiding officer shall specify the time for submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (unless waived by the parties), transcript of the hearing and supplemental exhibits, if any. He shall set a tentative date for the recommended decision based upon the timing of these preliminary steps. Extensions of time may be requested by any party, in writing from the Parole Commission. Failure of any party to comply with the time frame as established or extended will be deemed to be a waiver on his part of his right to submit the document in question. The adjudication will proceed and the absence of said document and reasons thereof will be noted in the record.

§ 4.14 Administrative law judge's recommended decision; exceptions thereto; oral argument before Commission

Whenever the hearing is conducted by an administrative law judge, at the conclusion of the hearing he shall submit a recommended decision to the Commission, which shall include a statement of findings and conclusions as well as the reasons therefore. The applicant, the Secretary and others to whom notice has been sent pursuant to §4.7 may file with the Commission, within 10 days after having been furnished a copy of the recommended decision, exceptions thereto and reasons in support thereof. The Commission may order the taking of additional evidence and may request the applicant and others to appear before it. The Commission may invite oral argument before it on such questions as it desires.

§ 4.15 Certificate of Exemption

The applicant, the Secretary and others to whom notice has been sent pursuant to §4.7 shall be served a copy of the Commission's decision and order with respect to each application.

Whenever the Commission's decision is that the application be granted, the Commission shall issue a Certificate of Exemption to the applicant. The Certificate of Exemption shall extend only to the stated employment with the prospective employer named in the application.

§ 4.16 Rejection of application

No application for a Certificate of Exemption shall be accepted from any person whose application for a Certificate of Exemption has been withdrawn, deemed withdrawn due to failure to remedy deficiencies in a timely manner, or denied by the Commission within the preceding 12 months.

§ 4.17 Availability of decisions

The Commission's Decisions under both Acts are available for examination in the Office of the U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815-7286. Copies will be mailed upon written request to the Office of General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission, at the above address at a cost of ten cents per page.

(28 U.S.C. 509 and 510, 5 U.S.C. 301);(44 FR 6890, Feb. 2, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 52354, Oct. 27, 1981)

(Figure 4) Sample Format - Report of Investigation U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration

This document is the property of the Employee Benefits Security Administration. Its contents are not to be disclosed to unauthorized persons.

File No.

Subject
(Name and Address of Applicant)

Date

Name and address of Plan

By: Investigator/Auditor
Approved by:

EIN/PN
Status

  1. Predication

    State the reason for the case opening and for conducting an investigation.

  2. Issues and Findings

    Cite the facts, which show:

    1. Nature of Employment Sought by Applicant

      Include a description of the position, including the duties for which the Certificate of Exemption is sought.

      Establish the validity or lack of validity of the reasons or grounds relied on to show the applicant's employment (for which the Certificate of Exemption is sought) would not be contrary to the purpose of ERISA. Include a statement concerning what access, if any, the applicant will have to plan funds and the degree of authority and discretion he/she will have in the position.

    2. Arrests, Convictions and Rehabilitation

      Verify applicant's statements in their supporting affidavit as to their history of arrests and convictions, which prohibit applicant's service to an employee benefit plan under Section 411 of ERISA.

      Under this heading, report views of the prosecuting officials, arresting officers, and judges, regarding the application for a Certificate of Exemption and include as exhibits. Include details of any mitigating or aggravating circumstances which might have been involved with regard to the factors listed in paragraph 2 of this Chapter.

    3. Disqualifying Offense

      Describe the offense for which the subject was convicted and consequently barred from employment in employee benefit plans under section 411 of ERISA.

      Discuss the subject's involvement in the offense. Include the extent of the subject's participation. Establish information such as whether the subject was an accessory or the principal perpetrator.

    4. Nature of the Employment Offered

      Describe the position for which the applicant is seeking an exemption. Be specific about the duties and authority for which the subject will be responsible as they relate to employee benefit plans.

    5. Personal Information

      Under this heading, report the results of the investigation into the accuracy of the sworn statements made by the applicant in their supporting affidavit and not previously mentioned in the report. This should include but not be limited to: birth date, extent of education, marriage and family status, present employment, past employment, military service, licenses issued, criminal record and probation or parole (if not previously reported in Part B above), labor organizations (with which applicant has been associated or employed), and financial background including net worth.

    6. Neighborhood Investigation

      Include statements of neighbors, landlord and superintendent (where applicable) as to applicant's status in the neighborhood and to verify applicant's residence.

    7. Credit Check

      Include reports of local credit bureaus and results of investigations at county clerk's offices regarding judgments against the applicant.

    8. Character References

      Include as exhibits interviews conducted with individuals who supported the applicant's application for exemption.

Exhibits

All significant facts presented in the report should be supported with exhibit citations. The following procedure should be used in submitting exhibits:

  1. State the name of the individual who is the subject of a Report of Interview or signed statement and the date of the interview.
  2. Documents, schedules, etc., should be precisely identified.
  3. Each supporting document should be a separate exhibit.
  4. Multiple page exhibits should be numbered.
  5. Exhibits should be identified by number.
  6. All copies must be legible.
  7. All plan documents (trust agreements, etc.) must be included as exhibits.

List of Documents and Workpapers Available in Regional Office but Not Used as Exhibits List documents, schedules, Reports of Interview, etc., in the Regional Office file that were not included as exhibits. Identify each document by the date(s) covered.

(Figure 5) Format for Regional Director's Cover Memo for a Report of Investigation in a Prohibited Persons Case Program 47 U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration

Memorandum For: SOL Counsel
From: Regional Director
XYZ Regional Office

Subject: Name, Address of Applicant Name, Address and EIN of Plan

First paragraph briefly state the basis for opening the case.

Second paragraph briefly state the nature of the original conviction and any mitigating circumstances involved in sentencing.

Third paragraph briefly state investigative results, specifically commenting on the applicant's efforts at rehabilitation.

Fourth paragraph briefly state the recommendation of the Regional Office as to whether the Department of Labor should contest the application.

cc: File, Deputy Director for Criminal Enforcement

Footnotes

  1. As amended by the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, Section 411 of ERISA prohibits individuals convicted of disqualifying crimes from serving in plan-related capacities during or for a period of 13 years after such conviction or the end of imprisonment, whichever is later. The period may be shortened by:
    1. The sentencing to not less than 3 years following such conviction or end of such imprisonment, whichever is later, or
    2. Their citizenship rights, revoked as a result of the conviction, are restored in full, or
    3. A federal district court determined service in any of the prohibited capacities would
      1. Not be contrary to the purposes of Title I of ERISA;
      2. In accordance with the sentencing policy at U.S.S.G Section 5J1.1; and
      3. The convicted individual was sufficiently rehabilitated as to not endanger the organization seeks to serve. ↩
  2. Before opening a Prohibited Persons proactive investigation, the RO should determine whether the subject was convicted of a debarring crime. If the crime is not an enumerated crime, then the RO should seek assistance from OE. ↩
  3. The following are the procedures for those seeking an exemption:
    1. For any disqualifying crime committed prior to November 1, 1987, a person seeking an Application for Exemption directs the request to the United States Parole Commission.
    2. For a disqualifying crime committed on or after November 1, 1987, a person convicted of a disqualifying federal offense directs the Petition for Exemption to the sentencing judge. If the conviction is a disqualifying state or local offense, the person must direct the petition to the United States District Court for the district in which the disqualifying offense was committed.
    3. A person seeking a Petition for Reduction of the Length of Disability for disqualifying judgments of conviction entered after October 12, 1984 directs the request to the state or federal sentencing judge. No such relief was available prior to October 12, 1984. ↩
  4. Pursuant to Section III, of the DOL/DOJ Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to criminal investigations (See EM section on Criminal Investigations Program). ↩
  5. 28 CFR Part 4. ↩