About the Study
In 2020, the Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) partnered with the Employment and Training Administration to fund contractors Mathematica Policy Research with Social Policy Research Associates and the Council of State Governments Justice Center to conduct the Pathway Home Reentry Evaluation. The study aims to develop design options for an impact and implementation evaluation to assess the feasibility of conducting an impact evaluation and examine the implementation of the Pathway Home Reentry Grant program. Based on the results from the feasibility analysis, CEO plans to conduct the most rigorous impact evaluation feasible of the Pathway Home program. As part of the feasibility assessment, the evaluation will include a review of Pathway Home grants and the design of cross-site impact and implementation evaluation options to examine Pathway Home.
This Department of Labor-funded study was a result of Section 169 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and the annual process to determine the Department’s research priorities for the upcoming year. It contributes to the labor evidence-base to inform employment and training programs and policies and addresses Departmental strategic goals and priorities.
- Workforce Supports for the Reentry Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Issue Brief, October 2022)
- Pathway Home Grant Program: Implementation Evaluation Design and Overview of Impact Evaluation (Evaluation Design Report, September 2022)
- What are the most rigorous evaluation options feasible for assessing the impact of the Pathway Home Reentry grant program on participant outcomes?
- How were programs implemented? What factors influenced implementation? What challenges did programs face in implementation and how were those challenges overcome? How did implementation vary by institution type (correctional facilities or jails)?
- What is the impact of the Pathway Home Reentry Grant Program on participant employment, earnings, and recidivism?
- To what extent do impacts vary across selected subpopulations of transitioning offenders (e.g., institution type, type of offense, age, veteran status)?
- Develop the knowledge base
- Conduct an impact feasibility assessment and develop evaluation design options
- Conduct an impact and implementation evaluation (optional tasks)
Issue Brief:
- Grantees that reported more established partnerships and stronger communication channels with correctional facilities appeared to be better positioned to implement their Pathway Home program during the COVID-19 pandemic, including conducting recruitment, obtaining referrals, and gaining access to the facilities.
- Grantees reported that early release policies at correctional facilities in response to COVID-19 hampered enrollment into the program and participation. Individuals were released early to reduce overcrowding, making them ineligible for the program or reducing their time in pre-release services. Grantees found it helpful to have a partner who would commit to providing timely information on release dates, such as someone in the correctional facility or the local prosecutor’s office.
- To address COVID-19-related restrictions, Pathway Home grantees and their correctional partners reported an expansion of technology in facilities such as providing participants with tablets and using DocuSign for paperwork, to improve the virtual outreach, intake, and enrollment processes.
- Staff turnover at both grantees and correctional facilities was reported to pose substantial implementation challenges, as did social distancing restrictions. Grantees reported modifying their office layouts and policies, and updating the occupational training courses they offered through the program to adhere to social distancing policies.
- Grantees reported that the strong labor market in 2021 increased the jobs available for participants and employers’ interest in Pathway Home programs (as a source of potential employees), but decreased participant interest related to training and employment services (because jobs were readily available). Grantees had to develop creative approaches to engaging participants, including providing incentives for participating in the program, and using social media to stay in contact with participants after release.
Issue Brief
Sandoval, M., Rakibullah, S., Yanez, A. (2022). Mathematica and Social Policy Research Associates. Issue Brief: Workforce Supports for the Reentry Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Chief Evaluation Office, U.S. Department of Labor.
Evaluation Design Report
Sattar, S., Yanez, A., Geckeler, C., Jarrett, N., Nelson, E., Rakibullah, S., Stein, J., Sandoval, M. (2022). Mathematica, Social Policy Research Associates, and Council of State Governments Justice Center. Evaluation of the Pathway Home Grant Program: Implementation Evaluation Design and Overview of Impact Evaluation. Chief Evaluation Office, U.S. Department of Labor.
Project Duration: 5 Years
Contract End Date: September 2025
Contractor: Mathematica, Social Policy Research Associates, and Council of State Governments Justice Center
For More Information: ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov
The Department of Labor’s (DOL) Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) sponsors independent evaluations and research, primarily conducted by external, third-party contractors in accordance with the Department of Labor Evaluation Policy. CEO’s research development process includes extensive technical review at the design, data collection and analysis stage, including: external contractor review and OMB review and approval of data collection methods and instruments per the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), Institutional Review Board (IRB) review to ensure studies adhere to the highest ethical standards, review by academic peers (e.g., Technical Working Groups), and inputs from relevant DOL agency and program officials and CEO technical staff. Final reports undergo an additional independent expert technical review and a review for Section 508 compliance prior to publication. The resulting reports represent findings from this independent research and do not represent DOL positions or policies.