Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

1996
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
08/27/1996
3(1)

Mr. Scott J. Morris 
Assistant General Counsel 
Northwestern Mutual Life 
720 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202-4797

Whether the NML Employee Disability Income Plan is an “employee welfare benefit plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(1).

08/07/1996
408(b)(8)

Mr. John J. Cleary 
Goodwin, Procter & Hoar
Exchange Place
Boston, Massachusetts 02109-2881

Whether certain collective investment vehicles established by Scudder Trust Company are and would continue to be viewed as pooled investment funds "maintained by a bank or trust company" within the meaning of the statutory exemptions in ERISA section 408(b)(8) and Internal Revenue Code section 4975(d)(8) and PTE 91-38 if the Trust Company retains its parent company to manage the Funds.

07/31/1996
104(b)

Frederick W. Dennerline III, Esq.
Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth &
Towe
1213 N. Arlington Avenue
Suite 204
Indianapolis, Indiana 46219

Whether a schedule of "usual and customary" fees, which is used as a basis for determining the dollar amount that will be paid for health claims made under a welfare benefit plan, must be made available for examination and/or furnished by the plan administrator upon the request of a plan participant or beneficiary under ERISA sections 104(b)(2) and 104(b)(4).

07/26/1996
3(33)

Mr. James F. Podheiser 
Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, LLP 
2600 One Commerce Square 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-7098

Whether the La Salle College High School 403(b) Retirement Plan and the La Salle College High School Flexible Compensation Plan are “church plans” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(33) and therefore exempt from coverage under Title I of ERISA by section 4(b)(2).

07/17/1996
3(1)

Mr. Durward J. Gehring
Bell, Boyd & Lloyd 
Three First National Plaza 
70 West Madison Street, Suite 3200
Chicago, Illinois 60602-4207

Whether the Topco Associates, Inc. Pre-Tax Premium Plan, is an “employee welfare benefit plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(1) when Topco employees may pay the required employee contributions under the Topco Group Health Plan on a pre-tax basis.

07/12/1996
3(33)

Mr. S. Howard Kline 
Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation 
One Oxford Center
301 Grant Street, 20th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1410

Whether the Retirement Plan for Employees of Mercy Psychiatric Hospital is a “church plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(33) and therefore exempt from coverage under Title I of ERISA by section 4(b)(2).

07/10/1996
3(33)

Mr. S. Howard Kline
Buchanan Ingersoll Professional 
Corporation
600 Grant Street, 58th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2887

Whether the Lutheran Home Care Services, Inc. Group Health Plan and the Lutheran Home Care Services, Inc. Tax- Sheltered Annuity Retirement Plan are “church plans” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(33) and therefore exempt from coverage under Title I of ERISA by section 4(b)(2).

07/08/1996
3(33)

Mr. Laurence A. Hansen
Lord, Bissell & Brook 
115 South LaSalle Street 
Chicago, Illinois 60603

Whether the Christian Brothers Employee Retirement Plan is a “church plan” within the meaning of ERISA section 3(33).

06/26/1996
407(d)(5)

Mr. Ross W. Lillard
Ms. Colleen E. Medill
Stinson, Mag & Fizzell
P.O. Box 419521
Kansas City, Missouri 64141-6251

Whether the ERISA section 407(d)(5) definition of "qualifying employer security" applies for purposes of the prohibited transaction exemption in Internal Revenue Code section 4975(d)(13).

04/12/1996
3(32)

Mr. Dana A. Yealy 
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh
601 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219

Whether the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh is a governmental entity described in ERISA section 3(32) such that any employee benefit plans established or maintained by the Bank for its employees would be excluded from coverage under ERISA section 4(b)(1).