Advisory Opinions

Requests for interpretations and other rulings under Title 1 of ERISA are handled by the Office of Regulations and Interpretations under the provisions established by ERISA Procedure 76-1.  The office answers inquiries from individuals and organizations in the form of advisory opinions, which apply the law to a specific set of facts, or information letters, which merely call attention to well established principles or interpretations.

Data Dictionary

2004
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
01/27/2004
3(32)

Albert L. Goldman, Esq.
Angoff, Goldman, Manning, Wanger & Hynes, PC
24 School Street - 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02108

Whether the Health Fund, Legal Fund, and Paraprofessional Fund (collectively, Funds), are "governmental plan[s]," as defined in ERISA § 3(32), and, therefore, excluded from Title I coverage by § 4(b)(1) of ERISA.

2003
AO/ Date/ Reference Recipient Description of Request
12/23/2003
3(32)

Charles G. Spalding, Esq.
Gilbert, Harrell, Gilbert, Sumerford & Martin
First Federal Plaza
777 Gloucester Street, Suite 200
P.O. Box 19
Brunswick, Georgia 31521-0190

Whether the Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital Retirement Plan is a "governmental plan" within the meaning of ERISA section 3(32) that is excepted from coverage under Title I by section 4(b)(1) of ERISA.

12/12/2003
3(5)

Ralph L. Hawkins
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
2600 Century Square
1501 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101-1688

Whether HEWT is a single employee welfare benefit plan maintained by a "group or association of employers" within the meaning of section 3(5) of ERISA.

11/21/2003
3(32)

Stephanie B. Gracia, Esq.
Hallett & Perrin, PC
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 3900
Dallas, Texas 75201

Whether the status of the LCRA Plans as "governmental plan(s)" within the meaning of section 3(32) of ERISA would be adversely affected if they were extended to cover the employees of GenTex Power Corporation.

11/17/2003
3(14)(G)
406(a)

William A. Schmidt
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP
1800 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Second Floor
Washington, DC 20036-1800

Jacob I. Friedman
Proskauer Rose LLP
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036-8299

Whether a limited partnership in which employee benefit plans invest would be deemed a party in interest with respect to the plans under section 3(14)(G) of ERISA where the plan trustee would hold more than fifty percent of the interests in the limited partnership on behalf of the plans.

10/08/2003
407(d)(5)
407(f)(1)

Mr. Steven J. Sacher
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
607 14th Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005-2018

Whether certain stock is a qualifying employer security in connection with a proposed exchange between GM and several employee benefit plans that it sponsors.  The exchange is part of a broader transaction, whereby GM plans to split-off its subsidiary, Hughes Electronics Corporation.

09/30/2003
3(40)
3(5)

Robert L. Sacks, Esq.
Kane Kessler, PC
1350 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019-4896

 

Whether the AICP Health Benefits Fund is an employee welfare benefit plan established and maintained by an employer group or association within the meaning of section 3(5) of ERISA. Also whether the Fund is a "fully insured" multiple employer welfare arrangement within the meaning of ERISA section 3(40) and section 514(b)(6)(A).

09/30/2003
3(32)

Albert C. Harberson, Esq.
Director of National Policy
The Council of State Governments
2760 Research Park Drive
Lexington, Kentucky 40578-1910

Whether employees of The Council of State Governments may participate in the Kentucky Employees Retirement System without adversely affecting the status of KERS as a "governmental plan" within the meaning of section 3(32) of ERISA.

09/08/2003
404(c )

Stephen M. Saxon
Groom Law Group, Chartered
1701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006-5893

Whether delivery of a Profile (as described in Rule 498 under the Securities Act of 1933) would satisfy the prospectus delivery requirements under ERISA section 404(c) regulations.

08/12/2003
407(a)(2)

Charles R. Smith
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP
535 Smithfield Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2312

Whether the reallocation of employer securities from the account of one plan participating in a master trust to the accounts of other plans participating in the master trust in exchange for interests of those plans in other assets of the same value held in the master trust would constitute an acquisition of employer securities for purposes of section 407(a) of ERISA.