Skip to page content
Office of Labor-Management Standards
Bookmark and Share

Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS)

U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Labor-Management Standards
Division of Enforcement
Washington, DC 20210
(202) 693-0334 Fax: (202) 693-1343

 

 

 

December 14, 2010

|||||| |||||
||| |||| |||| |||||
||| ||||||| |||||||| |||||

Dear ||| |||||:

This Statement of Reasons is in response to your complaint filed on January 11, 2010, alleging that a violation of Title III of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA or Act), 29 U.S.C. §461-464, occurred on January 4, 2010 when Roofers, Waterproofers, and Allied Workers (Union) imposed a trusteeship over Local 36.

The Department of Labor (Department) instituted an investigation of your allegations. During the course of the Department’s investigation, the Union initiated the process of electing new officers. An officer election was held on May 15, 2010 and the trusteeship was terminated on May 31, 2010. Therefore, your complaint is moot and no further action by the Department is necessary. Accordingly, I have closed the file regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

 

Patricia Fox
Chief, Division of Enforcement

cc: Katherine Bissell, Associate Solicitor for Civil Rights and Labor-Management

U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Labor-Management Standards
Division of Enforcement
Washington, DC 20210
(202) 693-0334 Fax: (202) 693-1343

 

 

 

December 14, 2010

Kinsey M. Robinson, International President
United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers
1660 L Street, NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036-5646

Dear Mr. Robinson:

This Statement of Reasons is in response to a complaint filed on January 11, 2010, alleging that a violation of Title III of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA or Act), 29 U.S.C. §461-464, occurred on January 4, 2010 when Roofers, Waterproofers, and Allied Workers (Union) imposed a trusteeship over Local 36.

The Department of Labor (Department) instituted an investigation of those allegations. During the course of the Department’s investigation, the Union initiated the process of electing new officers. An officer election was held on May 15, 2010 and the trusteeship was terminated on May 31, 2010. Therefore, the complaint is moot and no further action by the Department is necessary. Accordingly, I have closed the file regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

 

Patricia Fox
Chief, Division of Enforcement

cc: Katherine Bissell, Associate Solicitor for Civil Rights and Labor-Management