References. TEGL 7-97; GAO Year 2000 Computing Crisis: Business Continuity and Contingency Planning, (Aug. 1998). E-mail address: . Background. The Department's Y2K policy is to ensure that federally funded employment and training programs provide services to eligible participants through the millennium. ETA has addressed this policy over the past 18 months by providing Y2K technical guidance, information via Web sites, mini-assessments, and workshops. However, as the Year 2000 fast approaches, proactive management requires that States anticipate, that in spite of their efforts to address Y2K readiness, some potential remains for program disruption. Findings. As a result of the JTPA mini-assessment, the San Francisco and Denver workshops, and, ITSC's (contractor) risk analysis, some States/SDA's appear to be at risk in the areas of eligibility determination, reporting, and financial vendor payments. These problems could seriously affect operations. To address these problems and meet the due diligence legal test, State agencies would be prudent to have a business continuity and contingency plan (BCCP), which identifies core agency functions, defines future failure scenarios, and outlines alternative processes that would be followed in the event of a Year 2000 problem or infrastructure failure in power or communication. Proposal. ETA believes that risk assessment, business continuity, and contingency planning is the most appropriate strategy for State agency management at this time. Thus, ETA is providing States/SDAs with a GAO model Business Continuity Planning Structure, composed of a) Initiation, b) Business Impact Analysis; c) Contingency Planning; and d) Testing. - The first phase, Initiation, consists of establishing a State/SDA workgroup of high level management to address strategy, schedules and support. - The second phase, Business Impact Analysis consists of assessing the potential impact of mission critical system failures versus the agency's core business. ETA is providing a format, Attachment I, which enables the agency's managers to self assess the Y2K readiness relative to the risk of operational failure for their program. If the management determines the self assessment instrument yields a high risk score, it would suggest the State develop a fail safe contingency plan. - The third phase, Contingency Planning consists of identifying and documenting plans, triggers, and business resumption for each core business process. - The final phase, Testing, determines if the plan really works. The next steps are developing periodic updates, and making sure staff know the plans, the triggers, and their responsibilities. In addition, ETA's Y2K contractor, ITSC, will be available for technical guidance via teleconference on a scheduled basis for the period February 17 through May 1999. ITSC also has a web page at which lists guidance on these and other relevant employment and training Y2K topics. The Social Security Administration's (SSA) ABCCP has useful formats covering risk, timing, priority, strategy, responsible unit, and contingency triggers. This concept was discussed and determined feasible by a group of ETA Regional and State staff at the Denver MIS conference in early December 1998. The concept would provide State agency management with the tools to better assess risk, develop appropriate BCCPs, and ensure program continuity for mission critical business functions. The voluntary nature supports the partnership roles defined in TEGL 7-97, and reinforces State responsibility for program continuity. ETA believes that the process is important, however, the suggested formats are optional. Action Required. JTPA liaisons are requested to 1) Distribute the voluntary BCCP materials to State/SDA management and request they begin the process as soon as possible; 2) Track State/SDA's progress in completing the process and BCCP products; and 3) Inform the respective Regional Office's designated Y2K contact person, periodically, of the status.

To preserve the formatting of this document, it has been converted to PDF (Portable Document Format) to retain its original layout.

To preserve the formatting of this document, it has been converted to PDF (Portable Document Format) to retain its original layout.

To preserve the formatting of this document, it has been converted to PDF (Portable Document Format) to retain its original layout.

References. Chapter IV, ET Handbook No. 384, Second Edition, 20 CFR 614.12 and 5 U.S.C. 8521(a)(2). Instructions. State Employment Security Agencies (SESAs) shall use the attached schedule to determine Federal military wages for UCX "first claims" filed beginning with the first day of the first week which begins after April 3, 1999, pursuant to 20 CFR 614.12. SESAs will continue to use the existing schedule for UCX "first claims" filed before the effective date of the attached revised schedule. As provided by 20 CFR 614.12(d), the attached schedule shall be published as a notice in the Federal Register. Action Required. Administrators should provide the above instructions and the attached revised schedule to appropriate staff.

To preserve the formatting of this document, it has been converted to PDF (Portable Document Format) to retain its original layout.

Click on the link below to view, save, or print out the document.

To preserve the formatting of this document, it has been converted to PDF (Portable Document Format) to retain its original layout.

References: Wagner-Peyser Act, as amended (29 U.S.C. 49); 20 CFR 652 and 20 CFR 653; JTPA Sections 202, 252, 262, 302, and 601, as amended by the Job Training Reform Amendments Act of 1992; Training and Employment Guidance Letters (TEGL) Nos. 4-88, 4-95, Change 1, and 2-97, Change 1. Background: The JTPA Titles II-A and III allotments, and the Wagner-Peyser Act preliminary planning estimates are for the program period July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2000. The Title II-B and II-C allotments are for the period April 1, 1999, through June 30, 2000. These allotments and preliminary planning estimates will be published in the Federal Register. The JTPA allotments and the Wagner-Peyser Act preliminary planning estimates are part of the Fiscal Year 1999 funds appropriated in the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1998, P.L. 105-277. These appropriations include $995,000,000 for Title II-A, the same as the PY 1998 Title II-A level; $871,000,000 for Title II-B, the same as the FY 1998 Title II-B level; $129,965,000 for Title II-C, the same as the PY 1998 Title II-C level; $1,405,510,000 for Title III, a 4.07 percent increase from PY 1998; and $761,735,000 for allotments to States under the Wagner-Peyser Act, the same as the PY 1998 level. For States which choose to fully or partially implement the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) during Program Year 1999, these allocations will be used to support activities authorized under that legislation with the exception noted below for Titles II-B and II-C. (NOTE: States must continue to operate under JTPA rules until their WIA plans have been approved.) As States implementing WIA during the upcoming program year make strategic decisions on how to approach the delivery of services, it will clearly not be business as usual. For example, the funding provided may call for different contracting decisions than have been the norm under JTPA. In States where Governors choose to wait until July 1, 2000, to implement WIA, these funds will continue to be used in accordance with JTPA rules. Transition guidance will be provided during this quarter. JTPA funds are provided through block grants to the States for employment and training programs. These allotments to States are based on formulas defined in the Act. Under Title II-A (Adult Training Program), States will receive $955 million for job training services for disadvantaged adults and others who face significant employment barriers. For 1999, Title II-B and Title II-C appropriations language allows the funds to be available for obligation on April 1, 1999. This early obligation will allow States to begin making expenditures in advance of the upcoming Summer Youth Employment and Training Program, as well as facilitate the move toward a consolidated youth funding stream. As in previous years, the appropriations bill contains the authority for Service Delivery Areas (SDAs), with approval of the Governor, to transfer up to 100% of the funds between the two youth programs.

To preserve the formatting of this document, it has been converted to PDF (Portable Document Format) to retain its original layout.