skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital ImageryŠ copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov
July 25, 2008    DOL Home > News Release Archives > EBSA 1995   

Printer-Friendly Version

Archived News Release--Caution: information may be out of date.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION

HOUSTON COMPANY TO PAY $4 MILLION FOR IMPROPER ANNUITY PURCHASE

Wed., April 26, 1995

For more information call: (202) 219-8921.

Smith International, Inc., has agreed to pay $4.07 million to the U. S. Department of Labor as part of a settlement over the improper selection of group annuity contracts to fund pension benefits for its workers and retirees.

The money will be distributed to some 220 participants and beneficiaries of a pension plan terminated in 1986. The company received more than $23 million in residual assets from the plan after it purchased the annuity contracts.

"This settlement assures that these participants and beneficiaries receive the benefits promised by their employers," said Olena Berg, assistant secretary of labor for the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration. "It also puts employers on notice that they will be held responsible for the care with which they select annuities."

Smith International, a Houston-based manufacturer and marketer of petroleum drilling equipment, sponsored the pension plan. The annuities were purchased from Executive Life Insurance of California, which was placed in conservatorship by the State of California in 1991. At that time, the insurance company was paying approximately 70 percent of monthly annuity benefits owed to participants and beneficiaries.

The settlement with the department also dismisses all claims against members of the company's administrative committee, provided the payment is paid in conformance with the terms of the settlement.

The department sued the company and its administrative committee in 1992 for imprudently selecting Executive Life as the annuity provider without adequately investigating the insurer's or any other bidder's financial stability, creditworthiness or claims- paying ability. The defendants allegedly based their decision on Executive Life as being the lowest of five bidders; the resulting increase in surplus pension assets reverted back to the company.

The consent order was entered on April 12 in federal district court in Los Angeles. The case resulted from an investigation conducted by the Dallas office of the Labor Department's Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration into alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

(Reich v. Smith International, Inc.) Civil Action No. 92-1196 (HLH)


Archived News Release--Caution: information may be out of date.




Phone Numbers