By
Gerard Morales(1)
and
Octavio Novaro(2)
©1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
II. "REGISTRATION" OF LABOR UNIONS IN MEXICO
A. The Stage
B. Union Representation Procedures Under Mexico's Federal Labor Law
C. Maintaining Legal Status
III. THE FORMATION OF LABOR UNIONS IN THE U.S.
A. Employee Rights to Form Unions
B. Labor Unions' Formation Process--U.S. Section 9 of the NLRA
C. Reporting Requirements in the U.S.
I. INTRODUCTION
Whether the provisions of Mexican labor law pertaining to
employees' right to organize comply, in their application, with the
North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) has been a
persistent subject of controversy since the implementation of that
Agreement.(3) This controversy led to the announcement in early
August, 1996, by the U.S. National Administrative Office (U.S.
NAO)(4) that it would investigate and issue findings on whether
Mexico's regulatory process with respect to the workers' rights to
organize is consistent with NAALC's principles.(5) (6) Earlier this
year, petitions were filed with the U.S. NAO by several
organizations, alleging violations of those rights.(7) In July, the
Mexican NAO urged its U.S. counterpart not to investigate said
charges, arguing, in essence, that since the International Labor
Organization (ILO)'s Committee on Freedom of Association was
already reviewing that issue, the U.S. NAO should defer to the ILO,
under the NAALC's pertinent provisions.(8)
This article compares the statutory framework which provides
for the "formation" of labor unions in the U.S. and Mexico and the
procedures which labor unions must follow in both countries in
order to obtain and maintain their legal status.
II. "REGISTRATION" OF LABOR UNIONS IN MEXICO
A. The Stage
In recent years, Mexico's labor law processes have been the
subject of close scrutiny and discussion both by domestic and
foreign analysts. Perhaps the area that has generated the greatest
interest involves the requisites set forth in Mexican legislation
for the "registration" of labor organizations. This interest is
due, primarily, to the enactment of the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) and its offspring, the NAALC. The international
commitments made by the NAFTA countries have brought to the surface
the deep differences between each country's labor legislation,
which, in good measure, derive from their different historical and
cultural background.
Under Mexico's labor law framework, the importance of the
corporatist structure of "official" unions (or sindicatos) is
paramount. The main official association of unions, the Mexican
Confederation of Workers (CTM), has been a stronghold of stability
for Mexico's ruling party, the Institutional Revolutionary Party
(PRI), boasting 8 to 10 million members. A consequence of the
institutionalization of the CTM as an ally of the PRI has been that
the Mexican government has favored and even promoted the "registry"
of new unions so long as they are affiliated to the CTM and has,
correspondingly, discouraged the formation, i.e., "registration" of
independent unions or confederation of unions which are not CTM
affiliates.(9) As explained below, "registration" with the proper
governmental agency is a prerequisite under mexican law for the
legal existence of a labor union. This state of affairs has been
the subject of legal challenges which, recently, reached Mexico's
highest court.
Thus, on May 21, 1996, Mexico's Supreme Court ruled on the
right of a group of workers to constitute themselves into a labor
union and obtain the necessary "registration". At issue was a law
of the state of Jalisco that provided that there could be no more
than one labor union representing state or municipal employees in
that state. Based on Article 123 of the Mexican Constitution,
which guarantees the right of a worker to join, form or separate
from any specific labor organization, the Court declared the law
unconstitutional and granted an injunction to the Union of Academic
Personnel of the Universidad de Guadalajara. The Court noted that
Jalisco's law could not restrict the constitutional right of
association. On the same day, the Court, reversing a lower court
ruling, also held that a group of employees from the state of
Oaxaca could apply for union registration, irrespective of the fact
that there was another union in the workplace.
B. Union Registration Procedures Under Mexico's Federal
Labor Law
Mexico's Federal Labor Law (FLL) protects the right of both
workers and employers to associate "in the search of the study,
improvement and defense of their respective interests" and provides
the framework for the "registration" of labor unions.(10) The FLL,
at Article 357, provides that in order to organize a union, workers
or employers do not need any prior governmental authorization and
Articles 359 et seq., recognize the unions' right to establish
their own by-laws and rules; designate their representatives and
set forth their own organization and administration.
In the case of workers, however, in order to properly
constitute a labor union, the FLL, at Article 364, imposes a
requirement of at least 20 members in active service, and article
365 imposes the requirement of obtaining "registration" either from
the Ministry of Labor (Secretaria del Trabajo y Prevision Social or
STPS), or from the appropriate Conciliation and Arbitration Board
(which are Mexico's equivalent to labor courts and have
jurisdiction in individual and collective claims), depending upon
the specific industry involved. (Article 527 lists those industries
which fall within federal jurisdiction. Labor unions in those
industries must obtain registration from STPS.) Without
registration with the appropriate governmental authorities there is
no legal status as a labor union.
In order to "register," the prospective labor union must
submit the following documents:
-
An authenticated copy of the certificate of the
constitutive meeting;
-
A complete list with the number, names and addresses of
its members and the names and domiciles of the employers
to which each member renders his/her respective services;
-
An authenticated copy of its by laws or statutes (which
shall contain requisites set forth by article 371 of
FLL); and
-
An authenticated copy of the certificate of the meeting
in which the board of directors was elected.
In most cases, each and every authentication shall be made by the
General Secretary, the Organization Secretary and the Minute
Secretary of the prospective labor union. (Article 365)
Under the FLL, Article 366, registration of a labor union will
be denied:
-
When its objectives are other than those stated in
Article 356, (see fn. 10 above); or
-
When it does not have at least twenty members, as
required by Article 364; or
-
When the union fails to provide the documents required by
Article 365.
And under Article 369 registration shall be cancelled:
-
In case of dissolution of the union; or
-
Whenever the union fails to meet any of the legal
requisites.
With registration, the labor union acquires the legal status
necessary under Mexican law to enter into contracts, acquire
property and defend its rights and those of its members before
judicial courts and administrative agencies. (FLL, Articles 374
and 375).
C. Maintaining Legal Status
In order to maintain their legal status, labor unions must
file reports every three months with their respective "registry"
authority, which include the names of their new members and of
those who have ceased membership. In addition, labor unions must
inform their "registry" authority of any changes in their offices
and/or in their bylaws within 10 days of said changes. The
notification must be accompanied by authenticated copies of the
documents reflecting said changes (FLL, Article 377).
III. THE FORMATION OF LABOR UNIONS IN THE U.S.
A. Employees Rights to Form Unions
In the United States, workers do not have a constitutional
right to associate. The National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.
Section 151 et seq. (NLRA or the Act), is the statute that provides
the legal framework through which the right of employees to
associate is protected. The declaration of policy in the Act
states:
"It is hereby declared to be the policy of the
United States to eliminate the causes of certain
substantial obstructions to the free-flow of commerce and
to mitigate and eliminate these obstructions when they
have occurred by encouraging the practice and procedure
of collective bargaining and by protecting the exercise
by workers of full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of their
own choosing, for the purpose of negotiating the terms
and conditions of their employment or other mutual aid or
protections."
Indeed, the most basic policy under the NLRA is the employees'
free choice to form a labor organization or, to use the more
popular term, to unionize, without fear of reprisal or economic
penalty. Section 7 of the Act states:
"Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join or assist labor
organizations, to bargain collectively through
representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in
concerted activities for the purpose of collective
bargaining or other mutual aid or protection and shall
also have the right to refrain from any or all such
activities . . . ."
Thus, the principal rights protected by Section 7 are:
-
Forming or attempting to form a union among the
employees of an employer.
-
Joining a union whether the union is recognized by
the employer or not.
-
Assisting a union to organize the employees of an
employer.
-
Acting in "concert" with other employees with
respect to terms and conditions of employment.
-
Refraining from any concerted activity and from
activity on behalf or in support of a union.
Section 8 of the Act declares it to be an unfair labor
practice "to interfere with restrain, or coerce employees in the
exercise of their rights guaranteed in Section 7."
B. Labor Unions' Formation Process--U.S. Section 9 of the
NLRA
In the United States, unlike Mexico, labor unions need not be
"registered" with or authorized by the federal or state governments
in order to be formed or require employers to recognize them as the
exclusive bargaining representative of the employer's employees, or
to enter into legally binding contracts. In short, labor unions do
not require governmental authorization as a prerequisite to
constitute a legal entity for any purpose.
The term "labor organization" is purposely broadly defined,
both in the Act and in the Labor and Management Reporting and
Disclosure Act (LMRDA) 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., in order to
preclude governmental interference or restrictions in their
formation. The Act, § 2(5) (29 U.S.C. § 152(5)) states:
The term "labor organization" means any organization
of any kind, or any agency or employee representation
committee or plan, in which employees participate and
which exists for the purpose, in whole or in part, of
dealing with employers concerning grievances, labor
disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or
conditions of work. (emphasis added.)
The LMRDA definition is very similar. § 402(i) states:
"Labor organization" means a labor organization
engaged in an industry affecting commerce and includes
any organization of any kind, any agency, or employee
representation committee, group, association, or plan so
engaged in which employees participate and which exists
for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with
employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages,
rates of pay, hours, or other terms or conditions of
employment, and any conference, general committee, joint
or system board, or joint council so engaged which is
subordinate to a national or international labor
organization, other than a State or local central body.
(emphasis added)
Thus, the existence of a "labor organization" is not in any way
dependent upon compliance with governmental regulations.
Absent voluntary recognition by the employer, a union may
require the employer to recognize and bargain with it as the
"exclusive" bargaining representative of a group or "unit" of the
employer's employees, by obtaining "certification" as the
bargaining representative of said unit from the National Labor
Relations Board (NLRB), a federal agency established pursuant to
Section 3(a) of the Act. In order to obtain such certification
from the NLRB, a union must file a petition for a secret ballot
election to be conducted by the NLRB among the employees in the
group or unit requested by the union (NLRA Section 9) and obtain a
simple majority of the employees' votes in the election.
Generally, in order for the NLRB to process a union election
petition, it must be supported by at least 30% of the group which
the union seeks to represent ("showing of interest"). E.g., S. H.
Kress Co., 137 NLRB 1244, 1248 (1962). Such showing of interest or
support is normally submitted by unions to the NLRB in the form of
individual authorization cards. E.g., Potomac Electric Co., 111
NLRB 553, 554, 555 (1955). If an election petition is supported by
an adequate showing of interest, the NLRB must "investigate" such
petition. Section 9(c)(1) of the Act.
Unless the parties (petitioning union and employer) stipulate
on the election arrangement, the NLRB must, after "investigation,"
either dismiss the petition or order the election. In practically
all cases, the NLRB's "investigation" consists of a formal hearing
before an officer or employee of the NLRB regional office where the
petition was filed, on the issues of the "appropriateness," for
collective bargaining purposes, of the unit or group of employees
stated in the petition and/or on the eligibility of certain
individual employees or classification of employees to vote in the
election. At such hearings, the union seeking the NLRB
Certification and the employer have an opportunity to present
evidence and argue their respective positions in propria persona or
through counsel.
The NLRB's findings and legal rational, which must be issued
in writing, must be consistent with the Act and with legal
precedent. (NLRB Rules Section 102.67) Section 9(b) of the Act
states in pertinent part:
The Board shall decide in each case whether, in
order to assure employees the fullest freedom in
exercising the rights guaranteed by this Act, the unit
appropriate for the purpose of collective bargaining
shall be the employer unit, craft unit, plan unit, or
subdivision thereof ... (emphasis added)
Once the issues of eligibility and/or the composition of the
group or unit of employees are decided, the NLRB must either
dismiss the petition, if the union declines to proceed, or "direct
an election by secret ballot and shall certify the results
thereof." Section 9(c)(1) of the NLRA. The Act, Section 9(c)(2),
specifically provides that the NLRB must apply the same rules
"irrespective of the identity of the persons filing the petition."
Once certified, the union has the right to demand that the
employer engage in good faith collective bargaining for a contract
on terms and conditions of employment of the employees it
represents. An employer's failure to recognize and bargain with a
union that has been certified by the NLRB as the exclusive
bargaining representative of the employer's employees, constitutes
an unfair labor practice; that is, a violation of Section 8 of the
NLRA. Upon a duly filed charge alleging such violation, the
General Counsel of the NLRB must prosecute the employer. Sections
8(a)(5) and 3(d) of the Act.
In sum, in the U.S., unlike in Mexico, labor unions do not
require government authorization or "registration" as a
prerequisite to their formation or in order to petition for a
secret ballot election among the employees they seek to represent
to be conducted by the federal government. If elected by a simple
majority of said employees in an appropriate group or unit, the
union's right to require recognition and bargaining by the employer
must be prosecuted by the federal government.
C. Reporting Requirements in the U.S.
In order to maintain their legal existence, including the
rights to represent employees and/or to enter into collective
bargaining or other contracts, labor unions are not required under
U.S. law to disclose the names of their members. Importantly,
while the LMRDA imposes certain reporting requirements on labor
unions,(11) which may be enforced by union members or by the Secretary of Labor through civil actions, failure to comply with
said reporting requirements does not deprive unions of their right
to file petitions for election with and obtain certifications from
the NLRB, nor to file unfair labor practice charges which, if
meritorious, would require the NLRB General Counsel to prosecute
employers in order to require union recognition and bargaining.
The LMRDA § 431 (see fn. 11) covers the reporting requirements
on labor organizations which, prior to 1959, were required by
Section 9(f) and (g) of the Act. 29 U.S.C. § 159(f) and (g).
Sections 9(f) and (g) were repealed by the LMRDA in 1959.
Those sections provided that unions that failed to meet the filing
requirements were deprived of access to NLRB processes, i.e., would
not be certified under the Act and no complaint could be issued by
the NLRB on charges filed by them.(12) The legislative history of the
LMRDA reveals the considerations which led to their repeal.
Senate Report No. 187 stated in pertinent part:
To deny a union access to the National Labor
Relations Board because its officers did not file a
proper report is unwise for four reasons. First, it
would be ineffective in the case of strong unions not
dependent upon NLRB facilities; second, it is unfair to
the members who have done no wrong but who would suffer
both the denial of information and the loss of NLRB
protection; third, the rights and duties created by the
National Labor Relations Act exist for the benefit of the
public, and such legal obligations should be enforced
equally in all cases, not traded off against one another
as a system of rewards and punishments; and, finally,
experience with a similar provision in the present law
clearly demonstrates that conditioning the use of the
NLRB processes on compliance with not wholly related
requirements such as this can result in a frustration of
the principal purpose of the Labor Management Relations
Act, that is, settlement of labor disputes in an orderly,
efficient, and expeditious manner. In short, the
committee is convinced that such a procedure is costly,
cumbersome, and of doubtful efficacy.
IV. CONCLUSION
While the basic labor laws of both the U.S. and Mexico
proclaim the protection of the worker's right to organize, the
procedures followed in both countries are drastically different.
In Mexico, labor unions depend upon the governmental imprimatur for
their very existence. In the U.S., it is the workers' election, by
secret ballot, pursuant to procedures specified in Section 9 of the
NLRA and in the regulations published by the NLRB, that grants or
denies legal status as a labor union.
END NOTES
1. Jerry Morales is a partner in the law firm of Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P., officed in Phoenix, Arizona, where he represents management
in labor/employment and international matters. Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P. also has offices in Tucson, Arizona; Orange County,
California; and Salt Lake City, Utah.
2. Octavio Novaro was a visiting attorney at the law firm of
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. during the summer of 1996. Mr. Novaro is an
associate in the law firm of Barrera, Siqueiros Y Torres Landa,
S.C., in Mexico City.
3. See, e.g. 118 Daily Labor Report (DLR) A-5, June 19, 1996;
156 DLR, CC-1, August 13, 1996; and 159 DLR A-5, August 16, 1996.
4. National Administration Offices (NAOs) were created by the
NAALC for the purpose, in essence, of supervising the application
of the labor laws in the three NAFTA countries and their compliance
with the NAALC's principles.
5. One of the "guiding principles" which the parties to the
North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) committed to
promote, subject to each Party's domestic law, is the freedom of
association and protection of the right to organize. This guiding
principle is stated in Annex I to the NAALC as follows: "The right
of workers exercised freely and without impediment to establish and
join organizations of their own choosing to further and defend
their interests."
6. 149 DLR A-8, August 2, 1996.
7. Human Rights Watch/Americas, International Labor Rights Fund
and the Mexican-based National Association of Democratic Lawyers.
8. 159 DLR A-5, August 16, 1996.
9. In recent years, however, some independent movements have
gained strength, e.g., the Revolutionary Worker's Confederation or
COR; the Authentic Worker's Front or FAT and the Telephone Worker's
Union.
10. Title VII ("Collective Working Relations"), Chapter II
("Unions, Federations and Confederations"), Article 356. Article
8 of the FLL establishes that any person who renders to another
person or entity "a personal subordinate service" shall be
considered a worker. Article 10 establishes that any person or
entity that utilizes the services of one or more workers, will be
deemed an employer.
11. LMRDA § 431 provides:
Report of labor organizations
(a) Adoption and filing of constitution and bylaws; contents of report
Every labor organization shall adopt a constitution and bylaws
and shall file a copy thereof with the Secretary, together with a
report, signed by its president and secretary or corresponding
principal officers, containing the following information--
-
the name of the labor organization, its mailing
address, and any other address at which it maintains its
principal office or at which it keeps the records referred to
in this subchapter;
-
the name and title of each of its officers;
-
the initiation fee or fees required from a new or
transferred member and fees for work permits required by the
reporting labor organization;
-
the regular dues or fees or other periodic payments
required to remain a member of the reporting labor
organization; and
-
detailed statements, or references to specific
provisions of documents filed under this subsection which
contain such statements, showing the provision made and
procedures followed with respect to each of the following:
(A) qualifications for or restrictions on membership,
(B) levying of assessments, (C) participation in insurance or
other benefit plans, (D) authorization for disbursement of
funds of the labor organization, (E) audit of financial
transactions of the labor organization, (F) the calling of
regular and special meetings, (G) the selection of officers
and stewards and of any representatives to other bodies
composed of labor organizations' representatives, with a
specific statement of the manner in which each officer was
elected, appointed, or otherwise selected, (H) discipline or
removal of officers or agents for breaches of their trust,
(I) imposition of fines, suspensions, and expulsions of
members, including the grounds for such action and any
provision made for notice, hearing, judgment on the evidence,
and appeal procedures, (J) authorization for bargaining
demands, (K) ratification of contract terms, (L) authorization
for strikes, and (M) issuance of work permits. Any change in
the information required by this subsection shall be reported
to the Secretary at the time the reporting labor organization
files with the Secretary the annual financial report required
by subsection (b) of this section.
(b) Annual financial report; filing, contents
Every labor organization shall file annually with the
Secretary a financial report signed by its president and treasurer
or corresponding principal officers containing the following
information in such detail as may be necessary accurately to disclose its financial condition and operations for its preceding
fiscal year--
-
assets and liabilities at the beginning and end of the
fiscal year;
-
receipts of any kind and the sources thereof;
-
salary, allowances, and other direct or indirect
disbursements (including reimbursed expenses) to each officer
and also to each employee who, during such fiscal year,
received more than $10,000 in the aggregate from such labor
organization and any other labor organization affiliated with
it or with which it is affiliated, or which is affiliated with
the same national or international labor organization;
-
direct and indirect loans made to any officer,
employee, or member, which aggregated more than $250 during
the fiscal year, together with a statement of the purpose,
security, if any, and arrangements for repayment;
-
direct and indirect loans to any business enterprise,
together with a statement of the purpose, security, if any,
and arrangements for repayment; and
-
other disbursements made by it including the purposes
thereof;
all in such categories as the Secretary may prescribe.
(c) Availability of information to members; examination of books,
records, and accounts
Every labor organization required to submit a report under
this subchapter shall make available the information required to be
contained in such report to all of its members, and every such
labor organization and its officers shall be under a duty
enforceable at the suit of any member of such organization in any
State court of competent jurisdiction or in the district court of
the United States for the district in which such labor organization
maintains its principal office, to permit such member for just
cause to examine any books, records, and accounts necessary to
verify such report. The court in such action may, in its discretion, in addition to any judgment awarded to the plaintiff or
plaintiffs, allow a reasonable attorney's fee to be paid by the
defendant, and costs of the action.
12. "(f) No investigation shall be made by the Board of any
question affecting commerce concerning the representation of
employees, raised by a labor organization under subsection (c) of
this section, and no complaint shall be issued pursuant to a charge
made by a labor organization under subsection (b) of section 10,
unless such labor organization and any national or international
labor organization of which such labor organization is an affiliate
or constituent unit (A) shall have prior thereto filed with the
Secretary of Labor copies of its constitution and bylaws and a
report, in such form as the Secretary may prescribe, showing--
"(1) the name of such labor organization and the address
of its principal place of business;
"(2) the names, titles, and compensation and allowances
of its three principal officers and of any of its other
officers or agents whose aggregate compensation and allowances
for the preceding year exceeded $5,000, and the amount of the
compensation and allowances paid to each such officer or agent
during such year;
"(3) the manner in which the officers and agents referred
to in clause (2) were elected, appointed, or otherwise
selected;
"(4) the initiation fee or fees which new members are
required to pay on becoming members of such labor
organization;
"(5) the regular dues or fees which members are required
to pay in order to remain members in good standing of such
labor organization;
"(6) a detailed statement of, or reference to provisions
of its constitution and bylaws showing the procedure followed
with respect to, (a) qualification for or restrictions on
membership, (b) election of officers and stewards, (c) calling
of regular and special meetings, (d) levying of assessments,
(e) imposition of fines, (f) authorization for bargaining
demands, (g) ratification of contract terms, (h) authorization
for strikes, (i) authorization for disbursement of union funds, (j) audit of union financial transactions, (k) participation
in insurance or other benefit plans, and (l) expulsion of members
and the grounds therefor;
and (B) can show that prior thereto it has--
"(1) filed with the Secretary of Labor, in such form as
the Secretary may prescribe, a report showing all of (a) its
receipts of any kind and the sources of such receipts, (b) its
total assets and liabilities as of the end of its fiscal year,
(c) the disbursements made by it during such fiscal year,
including the purposes for which made; and
"(2) furnished to all of the members of such labor
organization copies of the financial report required by
paragraph (1) hereof to be filed with the Secretary of Labor.
"(g) It shall be the obligation of all labor organizations to
file annually with the Secretary of Labor, in such form as the
Secretary of Labor may prescribe, reports bringing up to date the
information required to be supplied in the initial filing by
subsection (f)(A) of this section, and to file with the Secretary
of Labor and furnish to its members annually financial reports in
the form and manner prescribed in subsection (f)(B). No labor
organization shall be eligible for certification under this section
as the representative of any employees, and no complaint shall
issue under section 10 with respect to a charge filed by a labor
organization unless it can show that it and any national or
international labor organization of which it is an affiliate or
constituent unit has complied with its obligation under this
subsection.
|
|