A. Congressional Mandate
This is the fifth Congressionally-mandated report in the international child labor series
of the Department of Labor's Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB). It reviews the
child labor situation in 16 countries where child labor has been identified as a problem and the
level and types of action being undertaken to reduce child exploitation in those countries. The
report has been prepared in accordance with the Departments of Labor, Health and Human
Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill of 1998, P.L. 105-78.
B. Overview
Until recently, child labor has not been widely recognized as an issue of important
global concern. International public attention regarding child labor has steadily grown over the
past few years, however, provoking worldwide discussion of the problem and possible
solutions. This increasing international concern has generated actions by various governments
and organizations to eliminate child labor.
This report provides an assessment of the child labor situation in 16 countries:
Bangladesh, Brazil, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Kenya, Mexico, Nepal, Nicaragua,
Pakistan, Peru, the Philippines, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and Turkey. It reviews
the extent and nature of child labor in these countries and establishes a framework that can be
used in future studies to evaluate progress in eliminating the problem. While there are many
policies and programs that can be implemented by governments that could have a positive
impact on reducing child labor, this report focuses on three main areas: law and enforcement,
provision of universal, affordable primary education, and the implementation or advancement
of targeted initiatives to combat child labor. The ultimate goal of these actions is to move
children out of inappropriate work and into situations where they can learn and develop to their
full potential. Tens of millions of children today are deprived of this opportunity.
The information contained in the report is based on material gathered during field visits
to the 16 countries, testimony submitted to the Department of Labor, and various other reports
and materials. The countries visited were selected because (1) allegations of child labor were
documented in previous ILAB reports, and/or (2) significant efforts are currently underway to
eradicate child labor. Since uniform and reliable data were not available for all countries, the
report does not rank the child labor situation across countries. Nor does it compare the present
situation to that of previous years. Rather, it is intended to serve as a baseline for further
study.
C. Child Labor: An Assessment
of the Challenge
Chapter II describes the nature and extent of child labor in the 16 countries examined
for this report, including available data on the magnitude of child labor and an overview of the
types of work children perform and the conditions under which they work. The report uses
International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention No. 138 on the Minimum Age for
Employment as its principal standard on child labor. Under ILO Convention No. 138, the
term "child labor" generally refers to any economic activity performed by a person under the
age of 15. Not all work performed by children is detrimental or exploitative. Child labor does
not usually refer to light work after school or legitimate apprenticeship opportunities, nor to
youths helping out in a family business, with household chores, or on a family farm. Rather,
the child labor of concern is generally work that prevents effective school attendance or is
performed under conditions hazardous to the physical and mental health of the child.
The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that at least 250 million children
between the ages of five and 14 are working in developing countries. Approximately 120
million of these children work full time, and tens of millions of these work under exploitative
and harmful conditions. According to the ILO, the majority of the world's working children
(61 percent) are found in Asia, followed by Africa (32 percent) and Latin America and the
Caribbean (seven percent).
Child workers are found in a wide range of economic activities. The largest numbers
work in agriculture, the services sector, and small-scale manufacturing workshops that are
generally not covered under the scope of national laws. Current available data show that, on
average, more boys work than girls. This gender difference, however, may be due to the fact
that girls more commonly work in less visible forms of employment such as domestic service,
which are often underestimated by statistical surveys.
Many of the world's working children labor in occupations and industries that are
dangerous or hazardous. In agriculture, large numbers of children are exposed to harmful
pesticides during their formative years. Others work in occupations and industries--including
mining, construction, manufacturing, and services--in which they are exposed to toxic and
carcinogenic substances such as asbestos, benzene, and mercury. Working children often
perform tasks that are beyond their physical capacity, such as lifting and carrying heavy loads
or handling dangerous tools and equipment. Work hazards affect children to a greater degree
than adults, in some cases causing irreversible harm to their future development.
Quantitative measures of child labor are essential for setting national goals for its
elimination and measuring progress once programs are instituted. However, reliable national
data on child labor are rare and, when available, often incomplete. Table II-1 presents the best
available official estimates of the number of working children in the 16 countries researched
for this report. Appendix B provides a detailed description of the characteristics and coverage
of these data.
Recently, the ILO's Bureau of Statistics has begun to provide assistance to countries in
collecting and reporting child labor statistics. Through the Statistical Information and
Monitoring Project on Child Labor (SIMPOC), the ILO hopes to compile enough data
to create a comprehensive database on child labor within several years. While a number of
countries have taken steps to improve their monitoring of child labor, many continue to lack
comprehensive systems for compiling reliable and timely data.
D. Legislation and Enforcement Efforts
One of the most basic strategies for addressing the exploitation of child labor is the
enactment and enforcement of child labor laws. Chapter III reviews child labor laws and
enforcement efforts in the 16 countries studied for this report. All 16 countries have laws
prohibiting certain forms of work by children under a specified age and regulating the
conditions of work for older children.
Table III-1 outlines the basic and hazardous minimum work ages in each of the 16
countries, while Appendix D identifies relevant child labor provisions in the laws of each of
these countries. The minimum age for employment in these countries varies from 12
(Bangladesh, Peru, and Tanzania) to 16 years (Kenya). In some countries, there is one basic
minimum work age, while in others, there are several age standards, depending on the industry
or sector.
Child labor legislation often applies only to certain sectors or exempts entire industries
or occupations. The sectors most frequently excluded are those where the highest numbers of
working children are found, such as small-scale agriculture, domestic service, and small-scale
manufacturing. For example, in Kenya, the minimum work age of 16 years applies only to
industrial undertakings. Likewise, in India and Pakistan, the minimum work age of 14
applies only to certain specified occupations and processes. In Nepal, the minimum work age
of 14 does not apply to certain enterprises, such as plantations and brick kilns. Exceptions are
also made in some countries for apprenticeships or educational work. In Brazil, for example,
children under 14 are prohibited from working, except as apprentices. Employers sometimes
use such exceptions to exploit children as a source of cheap and compliant labor.
All 16 countries studied have a minimum age for hazardous work, varying by country
from 12 to 21 years. Some countries have a single minimum age for hazardous work, while
others specify several such ages, depending on the type of work.
Despite the enactment of minimum work age laws, inadequate enforcement of such
laws remains a widespread problem. Labor inspectorates are often understaffed and lack
resources for transportation and other vital expenses. Training is often nonexistent or, if
present, of poor quality. In many cases, the low pay of inspectors makes them easy targets for
corruption. When inspectors do attempt to enforce child labor laws, they may face public
indifference, hostility from powerful economic interest groups, or parental reluctance to
cooperate. In addition, inadequate fines and penalties for child labor law violations often
undermine their overall effectiveness.
A number of countries have recently made or are considering changes to their child
labor laws, including increasing the minimum age for employment, adopting uniform child
labor regulations, and/or expanding coverage of child labor laws to additional sectors or
occupations. Thailand, for example, recently enacted a law raising the minimum age for
employment from 13 to 15 years. Bangladesh has drafted a new labor code, currently
awaiting approval by its parliament, that would impose a uniform minimum age of 14 years for
all forms of work. A proposed constitutional amendment in Brazil would prohibit children
from working before the age of 14, without exceptions. The Philippines, South Africa, and
India are contemplating legislative proposals that would broaden the coverage of child labor
laws and provide additional protection against the exploitation of children.
Several countries, including Kenya, the Philippines, Mexico, Tanzania, and Turkey,
are taking steps to increase the number of labor inspectors, improve training, and/or introduce
new enforcement strategies. A few countries, including Brazil and Turkey, are focusing their
enforcement efforts on sectors where child labor is considered to be particularly exploitative
and hazardous.
While such efforts are commendable, the fact that large numbers of children are still
working, many under exploitative or hazardous conditions, indicates that additional efforts are
urgently needed. To be effective, child labor laws should be made comprehensive in scope and
coverage, and enforcement should be improved.
E. Availability of Primary Education
Universal primary education is widely recognized as one of the most effective
instruments for combating child labor. It is believed that no country can successfully eliminate
child labor without enacting and implementing compulsory education legislation. Schooling
removes children from the work force and provides them with fundamental life skills, such as
literacy, numeracy, and critical reasoning. Quality education, particularly at the primary level,
not only improves the lives of children and their families, but contributes to the future
economic growth and development of a country. Despite the benefits of education, about 20
percent--or 145 million--of the world's children six to 11 years old (85 million girls and 60
million boys) are out of school. In most cases, these children are working.
Chapter IV describes education initiatives aimed at increasing primary school
enrollment, retention, and completion rates by overcoming impediments to educational
attainment. It focuses on educational efforts by governments--that, after all, have the principal
responsibility for educating children. While some governmental initiatives have targeted all
school-age children, others have focused on certain marginalized groups, including working
children. Chapter IV also discusses government strategies to increase children's access to
primary education through provision of free or subsidized schooling, school meal programs,
free transportation, flexible school hours, flexible locations, and economic incentives.
Compulsory education and child labor laws should not only reinforce but complement
each other. Compulsory education laws and policies can reinforce child labor laws by keeping
children in school and away from the work place. Child labor laws, in turn, can be a useful
tool for retaining children in school, helping governments achieve their universal basic
education objectives.
As shown in Table IV-1, 12 of the 16 countries studied for this report have national
laws making primary education compulsory (Bangladesh, Brazil, Egypt, Guatemala,
Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, the Philippines, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and
Turkey). The number of required years of schooling varies by country, from five
(Bangladesh) to 11 years (Peru). Several countries, including Egypt, South Africa, and
Turkey, have also recently passed laws extending their years of compulsory education.
For compulsory education laws to be effective, education must be made a viable choice
for children and their families. Significant impediments remain, however, with regard to
universal access to primary education. One of these obstacles is inadequate educational
infrastructure and services. Schools may not be available, or they may be of poor quality.
When schools do exist, long distances, poor roads, and lack of transportation can make them
inaccessible. Teachers may be underpaid or lack the necessary training or qualifications, and
in some cases, may not even show up for classes. Poor families may feel that their children's
schooling does not provide them with useful skills or make a difference to their future.
In the 16 countries studied for this report, significant numbers of children are not going
to school. Table IV-2, which provides data on educational attainment by country for the most
recent available year (1990 to 1997), shows that less than 70 percent of children are enrolled in
or attending primary school in five of the countries studied (Guatemala, India, Nepal,
Pakistan, and Tanzania). In seven of the countries, less than 70 percent of children enrolled
in primary school reach the fifth grade (Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Nepal, Nicaragua,
Pakistan, and South Africa).
Government spending on education varies widely among the 16 countries studied.
Table IV-3 presents data on education spending by country for the most recent available year
(1990 to 1997). Public expenditures on education as a percentage of GNP ranged from 1.7
percent (Guatemala) to 7.9 percent (South Africa). Education spending as a percentage of
total government expenditures ranged from under 10 percent (Bangladesh and Pakistan) to
over 20 percent (Mexico and South Africa), and primary school spending as a percentage of
total public education expenditures ranged from 18 percent (Peru) to over 65 percent (Egypt
and Nicaragua). By comparison, according to the World Bank's 1998 World Development
Indicators, the average percentage of GNP spent on public education in 1995 was 4.6 percent in low
and middle income countries, and 5.5 percent in high income countries.
Access to education is often not equitable. Children in rural areas and those belonging
to marginalized groups are frequently more affected by a lack of adequate educational
infrastructure. Rural children are also more likely to work. Indeed, work can constitute a
major impediment to children's attendance and successful completion of primary school.
Working children have low enrollment and high absentee and dropout rates. These rates may
be attributable to fatigue from long hours of labor, work related injuries and illnesses, and/or
work schedules that are incompatible with school hours.
Some of the countries studied have developed initiatives to make schools more
accessible and improve the quality of primary education, especially in remote or rural areas.
These include: the Livro Didático and TV Escola programs in Brazil to invest in primary
school books and provide long-distance training to teachers in remote areas; the Multigrade
Program in the Philippines that aims to increase the number of elementary and high schools in
local communities; a program implemented by the Turkish Ministry of Labor to open new
primary schools throughout the country and hire new teachers; and a program implemented by
the Ministry of Education in Egypt to build one-classroom schools at an accelerated pace in
rural communities.
A variety of programs falling under the "nonformal education" rubric provide
alternative educational opportunities for working children. These initiatives provide flexible
school hours to accommodate the schedules of working children, alternative school locations
for migrant child laborers, curriculum diversification, back-to-school programs, vocational
training, multigrade learning, and apprenticeship programs.
Some of the countries examined for this report are experimenting with strategies to help
ease children's transition from work to school and allow working children and adolescents to
attend school and complete their primary education. For example, in Andhra
Pradesh, the
state with the highest number of working children in India, a pilot back-to-school program has
enrolled tens of thousands of children into the formal school system. In some countries, school
schedules have been made more flexible in order to allow working children the opportunity to
study. In Mexico, for example, the Secretariat of Social Development's National Agricultural
Day Laborers Program (PRONJAG) recently developed a program to provide increased access
to basic education to the children of migrant farmworkers, many of whom work with their
parents in the fields. In Guatemala, new programs aim to make school more accessible to
rural children who work in the fields, including migrant children who attend different schools
during the same school year.
The Nicaraguan Ministry of Education's Extra Age (Extra Edad) program serves
children and adolescents who are unable to complete their primary school education on the
normal age and grade track. Classes are taught in modules to permit maximum attendance
during off-work hours and eliminate the social stigma associated with older students attending
classes with younger children. Similarly, a Child Labor Project conducted by the Philippine
Department of Education, Culture and Sports' Bureau of Nonformal Education (BNFE) aims to
reduce the number of dropouts and improve achievement in elementary schools by providing
tutoring for out-of-school youth so that they are able to obtain their primary/secondary school
equivalency.
In Peru, a number of schools have three shifts--morning, noon, and night--to allow
working children to combine work with school. A flexible curriculum developed by the
Ministry of Education allows teachers to give more attention and extra time to children who
fall behind or miss classes because of work. Finally, a regional office of the Philippine
Department of Education, Culture, and Sports has developed a school-based work-study
program in Lapu-Lapu City directed at elementary school age children who cut stone or make
firecrackers.
In addition to making schools available and improving their quality, some governments
have implemented economic incentive programs to encourage families to send their children to
school rather than to work. While economic incentive policies and programs have been used
for over 20 years to increase school attendance and, more recently, to address child labor
issues, it remains unclear whether or not such programs are effective.
One of the most common incentives policies is providing free meals to school children.
A number of countries (such as Brazil, Egypt, Mexico, and South Africa) are providing free meals
(breakfast and/or lunch) to attract and retain students, reduce the costs associated with school,
and ensure that children get the nutrition essential for learning. In some countries
(including Bangladesh and Brazil), food is distributed directly to needy families who send their children
to school.
Some countries eliminate, reduce, or subsidize school fees by providing school
vouchers to families in poor and marginalized communities, while others provide cash stipends
to compensate poor families for income lost by sending children to school instead of to work.
For instance, to offset school fees and indirect costs of schooling, the Egyptian Ministry of
Education's Mubarak Program for Social Cooperation (established in February 1996) is
providing school grants through the Ministry of Social Affairs to school children whose
families earn less than 100 Egyptian pounds (US$ 29.41) per month.
The School Scholarship (Bolsa Escola) program in Brazil, established as a pilot
program in the Federal District in 1995, provides a minimum monthly salary to needy families
that keep all their children between the ages of seven to 14 enrolled in and attending primary
school. As an additional incentive to continue education and prevent failure and dropout,
Brazil's Federal District Government is also implementing the School Savings Program
(Poupança Escola), which deposits a monthly salary in the savings account of each child
enrolled in the Bolsa Escola program for each grade that is successfully completed, from first
to eleventh grade. In Mexico, the PROGRESA program provides economic incentives to poor families that keep their children in school.
While the impact of these policies and programs can only be assessed by future
increases in the number of children attending and completing school, they provide an important
indication of the level of government commitment to the provision of universal primary
education in the 16 countries studied for this report.
F. Targeted Initiatives to Combat Child Labor
Chapter V presents some examples of targeted efforts implemented or advanced by
governments in the 16 countries to address the exploitation of working children. While there is a broad range of programs and policies that
could positively affect poverty and other factors that lead to child labor, Chapter V only
describes initiatives that directly aim to eliminate child labor and provide alternatives for them
and their families.
Targeted child labor initiatives usually facilitate and complement government efforts to
strengthen child labor laws and enforcement and to improve access to primary education. Such
initiatives also illustrate a government's commitment to eradicating exploitative child labor. In
many cases, these efforts are being undertaken by governments, in partnership with
nongovernmental actors. Other projects are being supported or facilitated by government
entities, either through direct funding or through government participation in international
initiatives such as the ILO's International Program on the Elimination of Child Labor (IPEC).
All the countries studied, with the exception of Mexico, are currently participating in
IPEC,
the world's largest and most effective program to eliminate child labor. A government's
participation in IPEC can be seen as an important step towards acknowledging the existence of
child labor and taking an active stance towards eliminating it.
Chapter V presents several initiatives targeting specific child labor populations in
agriculture, manufacturing, mining and quarrying, or the services sector, including children
working as domestic servants, prostitutes, and in various street occupations. In agriculture,
the initiatives described include programs to combat child labor in Tanzania's tea estates and
tobacco farms, Brazil's sisal plantations, and Mexico's fruit and vegetable farms, as well as
initiatives in Nepal and Turkey that target forced or bonded child labor in rural areas. Other
programs described include initiatives in the garment and soccer ball industries of Bangladesh
and Pakistan, where industry groups, international organizations, and NGOs are working
together to remove and rehabilitate child laborers. Similar programs are underway to eliminate
child labor in Nepal's carpet industry and Brazil's shoe industry. In Peru, a project is being
implemented to reduce child labor in the brick making and stone quarrying industries. Finally,
several efforts in Brazil, Kenya, Nepal, Nicaragua, Peru, the Philippines, Thailand, and
Turkey targeting child domestic workers, child commercial sex workers, trafficked children,
and children living and working on urban streets are also described.
In some countries, multi-sectoral initiatives are being implemented to combat child
labor through the rescue, removal, and rehabilitation of children from exploitative work.
These multi-sectoral programs often involve a broad coalition of governmental and
nongovernmental actors and community groups. In Brazil, the Ministry of Welfare and Social
Assistance's Eradication of Child Labor Program aims to stop children in rural areas from
working and assure that they attend school on a regular basis. The Government of India has
provided funding to NGOs to implement National Child Labor Projects, which have resulted in
the establishment of nonformal schools and the release of thousands of children from hazardous
work. One NGO that has received funding from the Government of India is the MV
Foundation, which can be credited for enrolling and retaining close to 80,000 children in
school. In the Philippines, the Kamalayan Development Foundation conducts rescue
operations with the collaboration of the government to remove child workers from exploitative
work.
Several of the targeted child labor projects described not only remove children from
exploitative work situations, but also provide supportive services such as educational
opportunities for the children and income generation alternatives for their families. Often such
multi-faceted and comprehensive programs are the most effective in eliminating and preventing
the exploitation of children.
G. Conclusion
Child labor is a complex problem that requires comprehensive, multi-faceted solutions.
This report describes the magnitude and nature of the child labor problem in the 16 countries
studied and presents several of the innovative approaches being undertaken to address the
problem. Today, numerous international organizations, governments in developing and
industrialized countries, and nongovernmental actors are developing and implementing
strategies and initiatives to eliminate child labor.
Accurately identifying the extent of child labor within a country is an essential step
towards the development of effective strategies for eliminating and preventing the problem.
Some of the efforts being undertaken by individual countries to improve the accuracy of child
labor data include:
- conducting specialized national child labor surveys with the assistance of the
ILO;
- using standard definitions and methodology for collecting and reporting child labor
data, based on those developed by the ILO's SIMPOC program and tested in several
countries; and
- institutionalizing the regular collection of child labor data by integrating a child labor
component into periodic labor force surveys.
This report discusses two of the most basic and traditional governmental approaches to
preventing the premature entry of children into the workforce: the enactment and enforcement
of child labor legislation and the provision of universal primary education. While all of the
countries studied have laws that regulate the employment of children, such laws may be limited
by their narrow scope, lack of clarity, and loopholes. Furthermore, ineffective enforcement of
child labor laws remains a widespread problem. Some countries faced with considerable
numbers of child laborers are now taking steps to address shortcomings in their legislation and
enforcement. Possible efforts in this area include:
- consolidating child labor laws and regulations in order to eliminate inconsistencies and
confusion;
- increasing the legal age of employment to conform with international standards;
- increasing civil and criminal penalties for violators of child labor laws;
- improving training of labor inspectors, providing additional resources for
investigations, and creating specialized inspection units that deal with child labor
issues;
- developing partnerships with industry, labor groups, and NGOs to assist in identifying
and preventing the exploitation of children; and
- increasing public awareness about child labor by informing the public about applicable
child labor laws and penalties.
A lack of educational infrastructure and services has significantly limited children's
access to quality, primary education. A number of countries are currently implementing
policies and programs to improve compliance with and enforcement of compulsory education
laws. Some countries also have projects aimed at increasing enrollment, attendance, and
completion of primary school. Steps that countries can take to accomplish the provision of
universal primary education include:
- passing legislation making primary education compulsory for all children;
- increasing educational expenditures at the primary level to increase school accessibility
and the quality of instruction (for example, enabling construction of new schools,
improving existing infrastructure, and authorizing increases in teacher salaries and
training);
- alleviating the costs associated with education that can prevent poor families from
sending their children to school by providing transportation, subsidizing the costs of
school meals, uniforms, supplies, and books, and eliminating school fees; and
- eliminating inconsistencies between child labor and compulsory education laws.
This report also discusses targeted projects, implemented or advanced by governments,
that focus on removing children from exploitative work and providing them with educational
opportunities. As with efforts to combat child labor through law and enforcement and through
the provision of universal primary education, targeted child labor projects provide a useful
indication of a government's commitment to the elimination of this problem. Key elements of
targeted child labor projects include:
- targeting child labor in sectors or occupations that are hazardous and harmful to a
child's development;
- removing children from exploitative work and providing them with alternatives, such as
education or vocational training;
- providing income-generating opportunities for families of former child laborers;
- establishing partnerships among governmental and nongovernmental actors and
international organizations such as the ILO and UNICEF and drawing on participants'
respective expertise and resources; and
- raising awareness among vulnerable groups of children's rights and the dangers of
premature entry into the workforce.
The information presented in this report can serve as a framework for further study and
evaluation of the progress being made toward eliminating child labor in the countries studied.
Ultimately, the best way to determine such progress is by documenting a reduction in the
overall number of children working and an increase in the percentage of children attending and
completing primary school.
This report was produced by the staff of the International Child Labor Program and is published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs.
Acknowledgements.