IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
05 CR 257S
v.
ALBERT MOORE, JR.
PLEA AGREEMENT
The defendant, ALBERT MOORE, JR. and the United States Attorney for the
Western District of New York (hereinafter "the government") hereby enter into a plea agreement with the
terms and conditions as set out below.
I. THE PLEA AND POSSIBLE SENTENCE
1. The defendant agrees to waive indictment and to plead guilty to a 1 count
Information charging a violation of Title 29, United States Code, Section 501(c) (Embezzlement from a
Labor Union by an officer or employee), which carries a maximum possible sentence of a term of
imprisonment of 5 years, a fine of $10,000, or both, a mandatory $100 special assessment and a term of
supervised release of up to 3 years. The defendant understands that the penalties set forth in this
paragraph are the maximum penalties that can be imposed by the Court at sentencing.
2. The defendant understands that the Court may require restitution in the
amount of $36,326.92, less restitution already paid, to be paid to PACE, LU #1-6992 as part of the
sentence, pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines § 5E1.l and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3663.
3. The defendant understands that, if it is determined that the defendant has
violated any of the terms or conditions of supervised release, the defendant may be required to serve in
prison all or part of the term of supervised release, up to 2 years, without credit for time previously
served on supervised release. As a consequence, in the event the defendant is sentenced to the maximum
term of incarceration, a prison term imposed for a violation of supervised release may result in the
defendant serving a sentence of imprisonment longer than the statutory maximum set forth in paragraph 1
of this agreement.
II. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
4. The defendant understands that the Court must consider but is not bound
by the Sentencing Guidelines (Sentencing Reform Act of 1984).
ELEMENTS OF THE CRIME
5. The defendant understands the nature of the offense set forth in paragraph
1 of this agreement and understands that if this case proceeded to trial, the government would be
required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements of the crime:
a. That the defendant was an officer or employee of a labor organization;
b. That the funds taken were those which belonged to the labor organization;
c. That the defendant did unlawfully embezzle, steal or unlawfully and willfully convert labor
organization funds.
FACTUAL BASIS
6. The defendant and the government agree to the following facts, which form
the basis for the entry of the plea of guilty including relevant conduct:
From April, 1999 until April 2002, the defendant, Albert Moore, served as the Financial
Secretary/Treasurer of the Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union
(PACE), Local # 1-6992, in Buffalo, New York. In that position, he was responsible for handling the
disbursement of union funds for various labor union expenses. He also was responsible for reconciling
the union bank account, which was maintained at M&T Bank. The primary source of the union funds was dues
from the local union members.
Beginning no later than January, 2000, Moore began to embezzle funds from the union bank account,
using a number of methods to get access to those funds and avoid detection.
One method Moore used to embezzle funds was to simply write checks to himself for money to which he
was not entitled. Although union policy required two signatures on a check, he was able to hide his
embezzlement from the union leadership by writing a check for a legitimate purpose, and after the
required signatures were obtained, he simply changed the payee.
Additionally, as part of regular financial reports, he submitted copies (never the original) of the
check ledger which falsely showed a legitimate payee, not the ultimate payee. For example, in August,
2001, Moore submitted to union leadership a financial report and a copy of the ledger, showing check
4367 paid to PACE for $1,396.00 and check 4368 paid to PACE for $1,600.00. Those checks, however, were,
in fact, payable to Al Moore. The check ledger was changed (after the financial report was submitted) to
reflect Al Moore as the payee, purportedly for reimbursement of office and administrative expenses.
In September, 2001, Moore submitted a financial report to the union leadership, with the report
ending with check #4411. There was no entry for check it #4412. Check 4412 was in the amount of $1,800
and was payable to Al Moore. The current ledger for September 2001 shows a check payable to Moore for
$1800 as reimbursement for administrative and office expenses.
In October, 2001, Moore submitted a financial report to the union leadership, with the attached
ledger showing check 4412 as its first entry, with a notation that it was payable to Ralph G (the union
accountant). The true copy of the ledger has that first entry entirely blacked out.
In total, during the time period between January 2000 and May 2002, Moore took $36,326.92 of union
funds to which he was not entitled. In late 2002, after the union had discovered the fact of the
embezzlement, but not the scope, Moore agreed to pay to the union the total of $15,000.
BASE OFFENSE LEVEL
7. The government and the defendant agree that Guidelines § 2B1.1 (Nov. 2001
manual) applies to the offense of conviction and provides for a base offense level of 6.
SPECIFIC OFFENSE CHARACTERISTICS
8. The government and the defendant agree that U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(1)(D)
applies since the loss exceeds $30,000 ($36,326.92) and increases the offense level to 12.
9. The government and the defendant agree that the 2 level upward adjustment
of Guidelines § 3B1.3 (abuse of trust/special skill) applies and results in an offense level of 14.
10. The defendant specifically reserves his right to make a downward
departure motion under Guidelines § 5K2.0(a)(4) based upon his family circumstances. The Government r
eserves the right to oppose that departure.
ADJUSTED OFFENSE LEVEL
11. Based on the foregoing, it is the understanding of the government and the
defendant that the adjusted offense level for the offense of conviction is 14.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY
12. At sentencing, the government agrees not to oppose the recommendation
that the Court apply the two (2) level downward adjustment of Guidelines § 3E1.l(a) (acceptance of
responsibility), which would result in a total offense level of 12.
GUIDELINES' APPLICATION, CALCULATIONS AND IMPACT
14. It is the understanding of the government and the defendant that, with a
total offense level of 12 and criminal history category of I, the defendant's sentencing range would be a
term of imprisonment of 10 to 16 months, a fine of $3,000 to $10,000, and a period of supervised release
of 2 to 3 years. Notwithstanding this, the defendant understands that at sentencing the defendant is
subject to the maximum penalties set forth in paragraph 1 of this agreement.
15. a) The government and the defendant agree to the Sentencing Guidelines
calculations set forth in this agreement and neither party will advocate or recommend the application of
any other Guideline, or move for any guideline departure pursuant to Chapter 5K of the Sentencing
Guidelines, except as specifically set forth in this agreement. A breach of this paragraph by one party
will relieve the other party of any agreements made in this plea agreement with respect to sentencing
motions and recommendations.
b) Both parties, however, reserve the right to seek a non-Guidelines sentence and to bring to the
attention of the Court all information deemed relevant to the determination of the proper sentence in
this action.
III. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
16. In the event the defendant's plea of guilty is withdrawn, or conviction
vacated, either pre- or post-sentence, by way of appeal, motion, post-conviction proceeding, collateral
attack or otherwise, the defendant agrees not to assert the statute of limitations as a defense to any
criminal offense involving or related to the embezzlement of funds from the PACE LU #1699 from 2000 to
2002, which is not time barred as of the date of this agreement. This waiver shall be effective for a
period of six months following the date upon which the withdrawal of the guilty plea or vacating of the
conviction becomes final.
IV. GOVERNMENT RIGHTS AND RESERVATIONS
17. The defendant understands that the government has reserved the
right to:
a. provide to the Probation Office and the Court all the information and evidence in its possession
that the government deems relevant concerning the defendant's background, character and involvement in
the offense charged, the circumstances surrounding the charge and the defendant's criminal history;
b. respond at sentencing to any statements made by the defendant or on the defendant's behalf that
are inconsistent with the information and evidence available to the government;
c. modify its position with respect to any sentencing recommendation or sentencing factor under the
Guidelines including criminal history category, in the event that subsequent to this agreement the
government receives previously unknown information regarding the recommendation or factor;
d. advocate for a specific sentence, including the amount of restitution and/or fine and the
method of payment.
18. The defendant agrees that any financial records and information provided
by the defendant to the Probation Office, before or after sentencing, may be disclosed to the United
States Attorney's Office for use in the collection of any unpaid financial obligation.
Waiver of Right to Post Conviction
DNA Testing of Physical Evidence
19. The defendant fully understands that, to the extent that the government
has or may have any items of physical evidence in this case that could be subjected to DNA testing
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3600, the defendant has the right to file a motion with the Court to have such
items tested for DNA in an attempt to prove that the defendant is actually innocent of the crime to which
the guilty plea has been entered in this case. The defendant has discussed this right with defense
counsel, and the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives the right to make such a motion and to have
such DNA testing performed on any such items the government may have or may obtain in the future. The
defendant fully understands that because the defendant is waiving these rights, any physical evidence
that may exist or be found to exist in this case will likely be destroyed or will otherwise be
unavailable for DNA testing in the future.
V. APPEAL RIGHTS
20. The defendant understands that Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742
affords a defendant a limited right to appeal the sentence imposed. The defendant, however, knowingly
waives the right to appeal, modify pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582 (c)(2) and
collaterally attack any sentence imposed by the Court which falls within or is less than the sentencing
range for imprisonment, a fine and supervised release set forth in Section II above, notwithstanding the
fact that the Court may reach the sentence by a Guidelines analysis different from that set forth in this
agreement. The defendant further agrees not to appeal a restitution order which does not exceed the
amount set forth in Section I of this agreement.
21. The government waives its right to appeal any sentence imposed by the
Court which falls within or is greater than the sentencing range for imprisonment, a fine and supervised
release set forth in Section II, above, notwithstanding the fact that the Court may reach the sentence by
a Guidelines analysis different from that set forth in this agreement. However, in the event of an appeal
from the defendant's sentence by the defendant, the government reserves its right to argue the
correctness of the defendant's sentence. Further, the government otherwise reserves all of its rights of
appeal as provided for in the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
22. Defendant waives and agrees not to assert in any civil lawsuit arising
from the conduct which gave rise to the criminal charges that are the subject of this plea any defense
based on the double jeopardy or excessive fines clauses of the Constitution.
VI. TOTAL AGREEMENT AND AFFIRMATIONS
23. This plea agreement represents the total agreement between the defendant,
ALBERT MOORE, and the government. There are no promises made by anyone other than those contained in this
agreement. This agreement supersedes any other prior agreements, written or oral, entered into between
the government and the defendant.
KATHLEEN M. MEHLTRETTER
Acting United States Attorney
Western District of New York
BY: /SIGNED/_____
GRETCHEN L. WYLEGALA
Assistant U. S. Attorney
Dated: September 26, 2005
I have read this agreement, which consists of 12 pages. I have had a full opportunity to discuss this
agreement with my attorney, Michael P. Stuermer, Esq. I agree that it represents the total agreement
reached between myself and the government. No promises or representations have been made to me other
than what is contained in this agreement. I understand all of the consequences of my plea of guilty. I
fully agree with the contents of this agreement. I am signing this agreement voluntarily and of my own
free will.
/SIGNED/______
ALBERT MOORE, JR.
Defendant
Dated: 9-26-05
/SIGNED/_______
MICHAEL P. STUERMER, Esq.
Attorney for the Defendant
Dated: 9-26-05
|
