IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
OF NEBRASKA, IN AND FOR SARPY COUNTY
THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, DOC. CR03
Plaintiff,
vs. INFORMATION
BARBARA JO HENRY
DOB:
SSN: SCSO#
Defendant
COMES NOW the undersigned County
Attorney or his Deputy of Sarpy County, Nebraska, and gives the Court to
understand and be informed that the above-named defendant, contrary to the form
of the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace and
dignity of the State of Nebraska, violated the laws of the State, to-wit:
COUNT I: THEFT BY UNLAWFUL TAKING, MORE THAN $500, Less
than $1500
On or
about the 29th day of May, 2003, at or near 1902 Harlan Dr., in Sarpy County,
Nebraska, said Barbara Jo Henry did then and there take or exercise control
over movable property of AFGE Local #840, with the intent to deprive him/her
thereof the value of said property being more than $500, less than $1500, in violation
of Section 28-511 (1), R.R.S. Nebraska. (Class IV Felony)
/SIGNED/___________
County
Attorney/Deputy
NSBA
#20669
STATE OF NEBRASKA
ss.
COUNTY OF SARPY
Laurie E. Burgess, being first
duly sworn, upon his oath deposes and says that he is the County Attorney or
his Deputy in and for Sarpy County, in the Second Judicial District of the
State of Nebraska; that he has read the above Information; and that to the best
of his information and belief the allegations and charges contained therein
are true and correct.
/SIGNED/__________
County
Attorney/Deputy
Docket: CR03-347
Title: State of Nebraska vs. Barbara Jo Henry
Action: Felony
Filed: July 2, 2003
Date Judge’s Minutes
January A.D. 2003
9/23/03 Case
called for omnibus hearing. State appears by Deputy County Attorney John Reisz.
Defendant appears with Public Defender Thomas Garvey. No pretrial motions
having been filed, case passed to docket call as previously ordered. Bond
continued.
/SIGNED/_______, Judge
9/30/03 Case
called. State appears by Deputy County Attorney Laurie Burgess. Defendant
appears with Public Defender Thomas Garvey. State is given leave to amend the
information by interlineation instanter. Defendant arraigned on the charge as
amended and enters a plea of guilty. The court finds beyond a reasonable doubt
that such plea is entered with an understanding of the charge, penalties,
constitutional rights, consequences of pleading guilty, and that it is entered
voluntarily, freely, intelligently, with advice of counsel and with a factual
basis. Plea accepted Defendant adjudged guilty of Theft, a Class IV felony, as
amended by interlineations. Sentencing deferred to December 12, 2003, at 11:00am, pending a presentence investigation which is to be completed by the
Adult Probation Office and returned on or before December 5, 2003. Bond continued in full force and effect, but modified to
require defendant’s complete cooperation with the Adult Probation Office in
conducting presentence investigation. Matter is hereby removed from docket call
this date.
/SIGNED/_______, Judge