Printer-Friendly Version
CHAPTER 2-300
- SCREENING
1. Purpose and Scope. This Chapter describes the procedures for
screening cases on a daily basis and establishing priorities of case files in
order to achieve maximum efficiency in the processing of claims under the
LHWCA. It defines the categories of cases, and the supporting documentation
that must be identified at the earliest date and timely acquired by the Claims
Examiner (CE) or Claims Examiner Clerk (CEC) for effective primary and
secondary reviews as prescribed in PM 2-200 and 3-300.
2. Policy. A CE or CEC should schedule duty time in such a manner
as to be able to handle not only the routine type cases which require very
little action or attention, but also cases of a more complicated nature.
3. Categories of Cases. The principal categories of cases are as
follows:
a. No-Lost-Time (NLT) Reports. The 1984 Amendments removed the
requirement for ECs to report injuries which did not result in loss of one or
more shifts of work. It is DLHWC policy that these injuries are not to be
jacketed into case files. (See PM 1-400.) However, Industry Notice No.
63, May 8, 1987, notified ECs that injuries compensable under the
schedule contained in sections 8(c)(1)-(20) of the Act would be jacketed even
though the injury did not result in loss of one or more shifts of work.
Therefore, most of the no-lost-time injury reports received will be reviewed by
the mail and records personnel and discarded before jacketing, obviating
initial review by the CE. The remaining no-lost-time cases fall into the next
category of cases.
b. Compensable NLT Cases. In this category are cases involving
schedule awards, disfigurements, third party action, or Notices of
Controversion (Form LS-207, Exhibit 20, PM 10-200). Such cases may require
requests for additional documents or reports. Usually, they can be processed in
a very few minutes and can be placed in either the first or second stack
explained in subparagraph 4a, below.
c. Lost-Time (LT) Uncontested Cases. These cases involve an
injury which results in loss of time from work beyond the day or shift of
injury and extending for more than three days. The EC must make payments
periodically, promptly, and directly to the injured employee or survivors
entitled to such benefits under the LHWCA (20 C.F.R. section 702.231). These
cases may be satisfied by payments with or without a formal award. In certain
instances, awards are paid as agreed settlements, (20 C.F.R. sections
702.241-243). These cases could be placed in either the third or fourth stack
of cases mentioned in subparagraph 4a, below.
d. LT Contested Cases. These are cases where either the EC or the
claimant/representative contests any action on a claim deriving from the injury
or death of the employee under the LHWCA. It may consist of an ECs
controversion of the right to compensation (20 C.F.R. section 702.251) or the
claimant's contest of actions taken by the EC with respect to the claim (20
C.F.R. section 702.261). Such cases would be placed in the fourth stack of
cases mentioned in subparagraph 4a, below.
e. Death Cases. These cases involve death benefits payable to the
employee's survivors, covered by the LHWCA. For more detailed information on
benefits and case determinations, see PM 2-202 and 3-302. Such cases would be
placed in the third or fourth stack of cases (depending upon the degree of
controversy) mentioned in subparagraph 4a, below.
f. Other Cases. These could be generally categorized as indicated
in subparagraphs 3c, 3d, or 3e, but involve special issues and more complex
evaluation/adjudication procedures as covered in PM 2-600, 3-302, 3-400, 3-500,
3-700, 4-200, 4-300, 4-500, 6-201, 6-202. Such cases would be placed in the
fourth stack of cases mentioned in subparagraph 4a, below.
4. Screening. This is the process of inspecting and sorting the
case files delivered to the CE's desk each day.
a. Organization for Screening. Under normal conditions, the CE
inspects the case files by arranging three or four stacks of cases as follows:
(1) Stack 1 (Not Critical or Complicated) -- Contains those cases
involving no complications, which can be handled very quickly. Certain cases
can be closed without further action and others may need only a call-up,
awaiting receipt of additional documents prior to closing.
(2) Stack 2 (Information Required) -- Contains those cases in which
the CE/CEC will need to take a specific action, but of such a nature that it
will not require significant amounts of time. Example would be the preparation
and dispatch of letters requesting a medical report, wage data, clarification
of jurisdictional questions, etc.
(3) Stack 3 (Evaluation Required) -- Contains cases that require some
study to determine the issues, action to resolve them, and possibly the
preparation of correspondence to obtain data that is critical to resolution of
the controversy. These cases can consume more time and may require the CE to
consult with the DD.
(4) Stack 4 (Further Study) -- Contains those cases of a more
complicated nature. They require intensive study, perhaps research, and in most
instances, consultation with the DD. These may include cases being processed
for adjudication by informal conferences or final disposition (e.g., issuance
of compensation order, payment of legal fee, approval of section 8(i)
settlements, section 8(f) applications etc.).
b. Workload Scheduling. After arranging the incoming cases as in
subparagraph 4a, the CE needs to estimate the amount of time required for
processing each stack. The determination of the sequence for working each stack
may be made by the individual CE; however, sufficient time should be set aside
to allow for completion of work on each stack.
(1) Routine Cases. Since the majority of cases usually fall in Stack
1, many examiners consider it more advantageous to work that stack initially to
complete and remove from the desk the greatest number of cases in the shortest
period of time.
(2) Other Cases. Usually, the greatest portion of the work day is
devoted to processing of the more complicated and time-consuming cases, placed
in stacks 3 and 4. (See PM 2-201.3 and 3-301.3 for in-depth review procedures.)
c. Priorities of Cases and Documentation. Each case file arranged
for screening as described in subparagraph 4a, is inspected for the essential
documents and/or information which has not yet been seen by any CE. The
presence of such documents may elicit a variety of possible responses. By
organizing the files and documents involved in this screening system, the
CE/CEC is able to review and process those cases with the greatest urgency and
establish a priority category for all cases each time they are reviewed. This
system consists of the following categories, in order of priority:
(1) Documents pertaining to cases where payment of compensation has
been stopped prematurely or contrary to regulations.
(2) Documents pertaining to a death case (e.g., Claim for Death
Benefits, Form LS-262, Exhibit 32, PM 10-200 and claimant's SSN).
(3) Requests for issuance of a Compensation Order and Proof of
Service.
(4) Documents pertaining to a claim, the validity of which is being
controverted.
(5) Medical Reports (Forms LS-1, and LS-204, Exhibits 1 and 18, PM
10-200 or other applicable documents) where full or maximum medical recovery
from the reported injury is indicated, i.e., final medical reports.
(6) Form LS-208, Notice of Final Payment or Suspension of Compensation
Payments (Exhibit 21, PM 10-200).
(7) Applications for section 8(f) relief.
(8) Form LS-206, Payment of Compensation Without Award (Exhibit 19, PM
10-200).
(9) Form LS-203, Employee's Claim for Compensation (Exhibit 17, PM
10-200) or other formal claim for compensation.
(10) Form LS-202, Employer's First Report of Accident or Occupational
Illness and/or Form LS-201, Notice of Employee's Injury or Death (Exhibits 16
and 15, PM 10-200), and/or other injury reports.
(11) Form LS-222, Carrier's or Self-Insurer's Report on Rehabilitation
(Exhibit 26, PM 10-200). (See PM 3-301.3g and OWCP Rehabilitation Procedure
Manual.)
(12) Other documents or information received, not included in any of
the above categories, will be reviewed and assigned appropriate priority by the
CE.
|