PDF Version

 

 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

____________

 

In the Matter of JAMES W. GILLIAM and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,

BALLWIN POST OFFICE, Ballwin, MO

 

Docket No. 00-737; Submitted on the Record;

Issued January 5, 2001

____________

 

DECISION and ORDER

 

Before   DAVID S. GERSON, PRISCILLA ANNE SCHWAB,

VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL

 

 

            The issue is whether the appellant’s low back condition was causally related to a September 8, 1998 employment incident.

            The Board has given careful consideration to the issue involved, the contentions of the parties on appeal and the entire case record.  The Board finds that the decision of the hearing representative of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs dated and finalized on September 2, 1999 is in accordance with the facts and the law in this case and hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the hearing representative.[1]


            The decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs dated September 2, 1999 is hereby affirmed.

Dated,  Washington, DC

            January 5, 2001

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            David S. Gerson

                                                                                                            Member

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            Priscilla Anne Schwab

                                                                                                            Alternate Member

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            Valerie D. Evans-Harrell

                                                                                                            Alternate Member



     [1] The Board notes that this case record contains evidence which was submitted subsequent to the Office’s September 2, 1999 decision.  The Board has no jurisdiction to review this evidence for the first time on appeal; see 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c); James C. Campbell, 5 ECAB 35, 36, n. 2 (1952).