PDF Version

 

 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

____________

 

In the Matter of DEBORAH J. ANDERSON and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,

MAIN POST OFFICE, Corpus Christi, TX

 

Docket No. 00-544; Submitted on the Record;

Issued August 14, 2001

____________

 

DECISION and ORDER

 

Before   MICHAEL E. GROOM, BRADLEY T. KNOTT,

PRISCILLA ANNE SCHWAB

 

 

            The issue is whether the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs properly denied appellant’s request for authorization of back surgery.

            The Board has given careful consideration to the issue involved, the contentions of the parties on appeal and the entire case record.  The Board finds that the August 31, 1999 decision of the Office is in accordance with the facts and the law in this case and hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the hearing representative.[1]


            The decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs dated August 31, 1999 is hereby affirmed.

Dated,  Washington, DC

            August 14, 2001

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            Michael E. Groom

                                                                                                            Alternate Member

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            Bradley T. Knott

                                                                                                            Alternate Member

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            Priscilla Anne Schwab

                                                                                                            Alternate Member



     [1] The opinion of the impartial medical specialist, Dr. Theodore W. Parsons, a Board-certified orthopedic surgeon, that appellant should not undergo surgery constitutes the weight of the evidence as it is sufficiently complete and well rationalized.  See Rosie E. Garner, 48 ECAB 220, 225 (1996).  Further, appellant’s treating physician, Dr. Gilbert R. Meadows, a Board-certified orthopedic surgeon, after reviewing the recent magnetic resonance imaging scan of record, withdrew his recommendation for surgery.  No evidence in the record establishes that appellant’s requested surgery was necessary.  See Dale E. Jones, 48 ECAB 648, 649 (1997).