PDF Version

 

 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

____________

 

In the Matter of FRANK S. DANTONI, JR. and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,

POST OFFICE, Jackson, MS

 

Docket No. 00-1248; Submitted on the Record;

Issued April 18, 2001

____________

 

DECISION and ORDER

 

Before   DAVID S. GERSON, BRADLEY T. KNOTT,

PRISCILLA ANNE SCHWAB

 

 

            The issue is whether appellant sustained an emotional condition causally related to factors of his federal employment.

            The Board has given careful consideration to the issue involved, the contentions of the parties on appeal and the entire case record.  The Board finds that the decision of the hearing representative of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs dated and made final on January 21, 2000 is in accordance with the facts and the law in this case and hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Office hearing representative.[1]


            The decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs dated January 21, 2000 is affirmed.

Dated,  Washington, DC

            April 18, 2001

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            David S. Gerson

                                                                                                            Member

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            Bradley T. Knott

                                                                                                            Alternate Member

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                            Priscilla Anne Schwab

                                                                                                            Alternate Member



     [1] To establish that he sustained an emotional condition causally related to factors of his federal employment, appellant must submit:  (1) factual evidence identifying and supporting employment factors or incidents alleged to have caused or contributed to his condition; (2) rationalized medical evidence establishing that he has an emotional condition or psychiatric disorder; and (3) rationalized medical opinion evidence establishing that his emotional condition is causally related to the identified compensable employment factors; see Kathleen D. Walker, 42 ECAB 603 (1991).  Unless a claimant establishes a compensable factor of employment, it is unnecessary to address the medical evidence of record.  Garry M. Carlo, 47 ECAB 299, 305 (1996).  Inasmuch as appellant failed to implicate any compensable employment factors, the Office hearing representative properly denied his claim without reaching the medical evidence of record.