PDF Version

 

 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

____________

 

In the Matter of JOHN F. CONLON and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Richmond, VA

 

Docket No. 99-790; Submitted on the Record;

Issued September 15, 2000

____________

 

DECISION and ORDER

 

Before   MICHAEL E. GROOM, A. PETER KANJORSKI,

PRISCILLA ANNE SCHWAB

 

 

            The issue is whether appellant sustained an emotional condition in the performance of duty, as alleged.

            The Board has given careful consideration to the issue involved, the contentions of the parties on appeal and the entire case record.  The Board finds that the September 8, 1998, decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is in accordance with the facts and the law in this case and hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the hearing representative.[1]

            The decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs dated September 8, 1998 is hereby affirmed.

Dated,  Washington, DC

            September 15, 2000

 

 

                                                                                                            Michael E. Groom

                                                                                                            Alternate Member

 

 

                                                                                                            A. Peter Kanjorski

                                                                                                            Alternate Member

 

 

                                                                                                            Priscilla Anne Schwab

                                                                                                            Alternate Member



     [1] Appellant did not present evidence to corroborate that his supervisors at the employing establishment harassed him or that his coworkers treated him hostilely as alleged and therefore failed to establish his claim.  See Michael Ewanichak, 48 ECAB 364, 366 (1997); Lillie M. Hood, 48 ECAB 157, 161 (1996).