Bankers Trust Co., New York, New York, BT Alex Brown Inc., and
Deutsche Bank AG [Notices] [07/27/1999]
Bankers Trust Co., New York, New York, BT Alex Brown Inc., and
Deutsche Bank AG [07/27/1999]
Volume 64, Number 143, Page 40623-40626-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 99-29; Exemption Application No. D-
10747]
Bankers Trust Co., New York, New York, BT Alex Brown Inc., and
Deutsche Bank AG
AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Department of
Labor
ACTION: Grant of Individual Exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a final exemption from certain of the
[[Page 40624]]
prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986 (the Code). The final exemption, granted by the Department of
Labor (the Department) to Bankers Trust Company, BT Alex Brown and
Deutsche Bank AG, provides that those entities shall not be precluded
from functioning as a ``qualified professional asset manager'' pursuant
to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-14 (49 FR 9494, March 13,
1984)(PTE 84-14) solely because of a failure to satisfy section I(g) of
PTE 84-14 as a result of Bankers Trust Company's conviction for
felonies described in a March 11, 1999 felony information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Allison Padams-Lavigne of the
Department, telephone (202) 219-8194. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 7, 1999, the Department published a
notice in the Federal Register of the pendency before the Department of
a proposed exemption requested by Bankers Trust Company and Deutsche
Bank AG. The Department proposed the exemption in response to an
application dated March 12, 1999, which was submitted on behalf of
Bankers Trust Company and its future affiliates pursuant to section
408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code and in accordance
with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).<SUP>1</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization
Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713, October 17, 1978) transferred the
authority of the Secretary of Treasury to issue exemptions of the
type proposed to the Secretary of Labor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The notice set forth a summary of the facts and representations
contained in the application for exemption and also invited interested
persons to submit comments or requests for a hearing on the pending
exemption to the Department.
The applicants agreed to provide notice to interested persons
within three days of the date that the proposal appeared in the Federal
Register. The applicants have represented that notice was furnished to
five interested persons two days later than that date. As a result, the
comment period was extended for two additional days. The applicants
represent that notice to all other interested persons was furnished in
a timely manner. All comments and requests for hearing were due by July
12, 1999.
The Department received eleven comments from interested persons on
the proposed exemption. The Department forwarded copies of the comments
to the applicants and requested that the applicants address in writing
the various concerns raised by the commentators. Most of the comments
fell into broad categories that the applicants responded to in a
general fashion. Where a single commentator raised a specific issue,
such issue was responded to individually. A description of the comments
and the applicants' responses are summarized below.
One commentator urged that the exemption not be granted because he
had not received all of his benefits under a plan maintained by Bankers
Trust Company. Bankers Trust Company notes that the former participant
enclosed with his comment a copy of the check receipt that he had
received at the time of the distribution. Bankers Trust Company
believes that the participant received the full amount of his benefit
at the time he received his check receipt.
Five comments urged denial of the exemption because of the
commentators' belief that Bankers Trust Company has failed to meet the
highest standard as a fiduciary. Deutsche Bank AG responded that it is
committed to maintaining the highest fiduciary standards on which
Bankers Trust Company was organized in 1903, and intends to bring
together the best of the long traditions of service of each
organization, building on the organizational changes described in the
exemption application and the new policies and procedures put in place
in the recent past.
One commentator suggested that not all employees have received
certain ethics training. Deutsche Bank AG represents that it will
verify that all Global Institutional Services (GIS) employees have
received the appropriate training.<SUP>2</SUP> Another commentator was
concerned that the legal protections of the Act and the Code would be
eliminated if the exemption was granted. Deutsche Bank AG responded
that it understands that all of the legal requirements of the Act and
the Code continue to apply to the employee benefit plans of Bankers
Trust Company and, as sponsor of those plans, represents that it will
fully comply with all laws respecting its plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The March 11, 1999 felony information related to the conduct
of certain employees in Bankers Trust Company's processing services
business. This unit was subsequently restructured as part of GIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two commentators opposed the granting of the exemption because they
had unanswered questions about their pension benefits. While these
comments did not relate to the terms of the exemption, Deutsche Bank
represents that it will contact those commentators and attempt to
resolve their questions.
Another commentator argued that the exemption ought to be denied
because, in the commentator's view, Deutsche Bank AG discriminates
against members of the Church of Scientology. Deutsche Bank AG states
that it maintains strict policies against discrimination on the basis
of sex, race, creed or national origin and believes that those policies
have been adhered to. Another commentator argued that the exemption
should be denied because, in the past, Bankers Trust Company merged two
of its employee benefit plans inappropriately. Bankers Trust Company
responds that its actions in merging its plans were fully in compliance
with the law.
In addition to comments, questions and requests for a hearing, the
Department also received a comment letter, dated July 13, 1999, from
Deutsche Bank AG. Deutsche Bank AG notes that Paragraph 2 of the Facts
and Representations of the Notice states that BT Alex Brown is a
subsidiary of Bankers Trust Corporation. Deutsche Bank AG noted that
while that fact was true as of the date of the proposed exemption, BT
Alex Brown is now a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.
Two commentators also requested a hearing on the proposal. The
Department believes that the issues raised by the commentators are
outside the scope of the proposed exemption. Accordingly, the
Department does not believe that any issues have been identified which
would require the convening of a hearing and has determined not to hold
a public hearing.
Accordingly, after giving full consideration to the entire record,
including the comments by the commentators, and the responses of the
applicants, the Department has determined to grant the exemption. In
this regard, the comments submitted to the Department have been
included as part of the public record of the exemption application. The
complete application file, including all supplemental submissions
received by the Department, is made available for public inspection in
the Public Documents Room of the Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration, Room N-5507, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Ave. NW, Washington DC 20010.
[[Page 40625]]
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
granted under section 408(a) of the Act and/or 4975(c)(2) of the Code
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest with respect to
a plan to which the exemption is applicable from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code. These provisions include any
prohibited transaction provisions to which the exemption does not apply
and the general fiduciary provisions of section 404 of the Act which,
among other things, requires a fiduciary to discharge his or her duties
respecting the plan solely in the interests of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the requirement of
section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate for the exclusive
benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining the plan and their
beneficiaries.
(2) This exemption is supplemental to and not in derogation of any
other provisions of the Act and/or Code, including statutory or
administrative exemptions and transitional rules. Furthermore, the fact
that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory
exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption is subject to the express
condition that the material facts and representations contained in the
application are true and complete and accurately describe all material
terms of the transaction which is the subject of this exemption.
Exemption
Section I. Bankers Trust Company
Bankers Trust Company shall not be precluded from functioning as a
``qualified professional asset manager'' pursuant to Prohibited
Transaction Exemption 84-14 (49 FR 9494, March 13, 1994) (PTE 84-14)
for the period beginning on the date of sentencing with respect to the
charges to which Bankers Trust Company <SUP>3</SUP> pled guilty on
March 11, 1999 and ending five years <SUP>4</SUP> from the date of
publication of the final exemption in the Federal Register, solely
because of a failure to satisfy section I(g) of PTE 84-14 as a result
of the conviction of Bankers Trust Company for felonies described in
the March 11, 1999 felony information (the Information) entered in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, provided
that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On June 4, 1999, Bankers Trust Corporation, the parent of
Bankers Trust Company, was acquired by Deutsche Bank AG. Bankers
Trust Company, now a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, continues to
offer banking services to its clients.
\4\ Prior to the expiration of this exemption, Bankers Trust
Company may apply for an extension of the exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) This exemption is not applicable if Bankers Trust Company
becomes affiliated with any person or entity convicted of any of the
crimes described in section I(g) of PTE 84-14; and
(b) This exemption is not applicable if Bankers Trust Company is
convicted of any of the crimes described in section I(g) of PTE 84-14,
other than those felonies discussed in the Information;
(c) The custody operations that were part of Bankers Trust Company
at the time of the March 11, 1999 information, and which have
subsequently been reorganized as part of Global Institutional Services
(GIS), are subject to an annual examination of its abandoned property
and escheatment policies, procedures and practices by an independent
public accounting firm. The examination required by this condition
shall determine whether the written procedures adopted by Bankers Trust
Company are properly designed to assure compliance with the
requirements of ERISA. The annual examination shall specifically
require a determination by the auditor as to whether the Bank has
developed and adopted internal policies and procedures that achieve
appropriate control objectives and shall include a test of a
representative sample of transactions, fifty percent of which must
involve ERISA covered plans, to determine operational compliance with
such policies and procedures. The auditor shall issue a written report
describing the steps performed by the auditor during the course of its
examination. The report shall include the auditor's specific findings
and recommendations. This requirement shall continue to be applicable
to the custody operations that were part of Bankers Trust Company as of
March 11, 1999, notwithstanding any subsequent reorganization of the
custody operation function during the term of the exemption.
(d) With respect to the independent audit report described in
section I(c) above:
(1) Bankers Trust Company shall provide notice to the Department of
any instances of the Bank's noncompliance with the written policies and
procedures reviewed by the auditor within 10 business days after such
noncompliance is determined by the auditor notwithstanding the fact
that the examination may not have been completed as of that date. Upon
request, the auditor shall provide the Department with all of the
relevant workpapers reflecting the instances of noncompliance. The
workpapers should identify whether and to what extent the assets of
ERISA plans were involved in the instances of noncompliance, and
(2) Any information relating to the Bank's noncompliance with the
written policies and procedures that is required by Federal and/or
state banking authorities to be reported to the state and/or Federal
banking agencies shall also be reported by Bankers Trust Company to the
Department within the same time frames that such information is
otherwise required to be reported to those agencies.
(e) The annual examination described in section I(c) above will be
provided to the Department not later than 90 days following the 12
month period to which it relates, and will be unconditionally available
for examination by any duly authorized employee or representative of
the Department, Internal Revenue Service, Securities and Exchange
Commission or Department of Justice or other relevant regulators and
any fiduciary of a plan for which Bankers Trust Company performs
services.
Section II
BT Alex. Brown Incorporated and its subsidiaries and Deutsche Bank
AG shall not be precluded from functioning as a ``qualified
professional asset manager'' pursuant to PTE 84-14 for the period
beginning on the date of sentencing with respect to the charges to
which Bankers Trust Company pled guilty on March 11, 1999 and ending
ten years from the date of publication of the final exemption in the
Federal Register, solely because of a failure to satisfy section I(g)
of PTE 84-14 as a result of an affiliation with Bankers Trust Company,
provided that:
(a) This exemption is not applicable if BT Alex. Brown
Incorporated, its subsidiaries or Deutsche Bank AG becomes affiliated
with any person or entity convicted of any of the crimes described in
section I(g) of PTE 84-14; and
(b) This exemption is not applicable if BT Alex. Brown
Incorporated, its subsidiaries or Deutsche Bank AG is convicted of any
of the crimes described in section I(g) of PTE 84-14.
Section III. Definitions
(a) For purposes of this exemption, the term ``Bankers Trust
Company'' includes Bankers Trust Company and any entity that was
affiliated with Bankers Trust Company prior to the
[[Page 40626]]
date of the acquisition of Bankers Trust Corporation by Deutsche Bank
AG, other than BT Alex. Brown Incorporated and its subsidiaries.
(b) For purposes of this exemption, ``Deutsche Bank AG'' includes
Deutsche Bank AG and any entity that was affiliated with Deutsche Bank
AG prior to the date of the acquisition of Bankers Trust Corporation by
Deutsche Bank AG, and any future affiliates, other than Bankers Trust
Company, as defined in subsection (a).
(c) The term ``affiliate'' of a person means--
(1) Any person directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with the person,
(2) Any director of, relative of, or partner in, any such person,
(3) Any corporation, partnership, trust or unincorporated
enterprise of which such person is an officer, director, or a 5 percent
or more partner or owner, and,
(4) Any employee or officer of the person who--
(A) is a highly compensated employee (as defined in section
4975(e)(2)(H) of the Code) or officer (earning 10 percent or more of
the yearly wages of such person) or,
(B) has direct or indirect authority, responsibility or control
regarding the custody, management or disposition of plan assets.
(d) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of July, 1999.
Ivan L. Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration, Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 99-19152 Filed 7-26-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
|