|
Advisory Opinion |
|
|
October 8, 2003 |
2003-14A |
|
Mr. Steven J. Sacher |
|
|
Dear Mr. Sacher: |
|
|
This is in response to your request for an advisory opinion with respect to the application of sections 407(d)(1), (5), and (7), 407(f)(1) and 408(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).(1) In particular, you request an opinion as to whether certain stock described below is a qualifying employer security in connection with a proposed exchange (the Exchange) between General Motors Corporation (GM) and several employee benefit plans that it sponsors (the GM Plans). You represent that the Exchange is part of a broader transaction, described below, whereby GM, subject to the approval of GM shareholders and satisfaction of certain other conditions, plans to split-off GM’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Hughes Electronics Corporation (Hughes). |
|
|
GM has two classes of publicly held common stock – GM $1 2/3 Par Value Common Stock and Class H Common Stock (Class H Stock). The Class H Stock is a New York Stock Exchange-traded “tracking” stock, the value of which is intended to reflect the business performance of Hughes. As of the date of the Exchange, there will be approximately 1.1 billion shares of GM Class H Stock issued and outstanding. In addition, there will be approximately 279 million shares of Class H Stock authorized but unissued. The GM Plans in the aggregate own approximately 373 million shares of Class H Stock, about 33.7% of the Class H Stock issued and outstanding.(2) |
|
|
Hughes has two classes of common stock – Hughes Common Stock (referred to as Hughes Class A Common Stock) and Hughes Class B Common Stock, the terms of which are identical in all respects. GM currently owns 100% of both classes of the Hughes stock. You represent that the reason that there are two classes of Hughes stock is to enable GM to isolate the separate and distinct tax bases associated with the Exchange and to facilitate the post split-off merger with the buyer of Hughes. As of the date of the Exchange, there will be approximately 1.4 billion shares of Hughes common stock issued and outstanding, comprised of approximately 1.1 billion shares of Class A Stock (which corresponds to the issued and outstanding Class H Stock) and approximately 279 million shares of Class B Stock (which corresponds to the authorized but unissued Class H Stock). The Hughes Class A Common Stock corresponds to the issued and outstanding GM Class H Stock, which is owned by the GM Plans as well as unrelated investors. |
|
|
The GM Plans that currently own GM Class H Stock and are expected to participate in the Exchange are:
|
|
|
As of March 12, 2003,(3) the holdings of GM Class H Stock by the GM Plans were:
|
|
|
Thus, the GM Plans hold approximately 373 million shares of GM Class H Stock or about 33.7% of the Class H Stock issued and outstanding. In total, the Plans and other persons you represent are not independent of the issuer(4) (GM) hold approximately 35.8% of the Class H Stock issued and outstanding. You represent that any changes that may occur in any of these holdings between March 12, 2003, and the date of the Exchange will not be material to any relevant test or limit under ERISA. |
|
|
GM will split off Hughes through a transaction that will include: 1) the Exchange; and 2) the simultaneous sale by GM of the Hughes Class B Common Stock to The News Corporation Limited (News Corp.), an Australian company that you represent is totally independent of GM (the Sale). In the Exchange, holders of GM Class H Stock, including the GM Plans, will exchange their shares with GM for Hughes Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. The GM Plans will participate in the Exchange on the same basis as all other Class H stockholders. You represent that when the Exchange and Sale close,(5) Hughes will be split off from and wholly independent of GM. Immediately following the Exchange and Sale, GM will no longer retain any shares of Hughes common stock.(6) |
|
|
Completion of the entire transaction (the Sale and Exchange, and the merger) is subject to a number of conditions, including approval by a majority of both the holders of the GM $1 2/3 Par Value Common and Class H stock. The transaction has been approved by the GM, Hughes, and News Corp. boards of directors. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approval under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and by the Federal Communications Commission, and is contingent on the receipt of a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that the split off of Hughes from GM will be tax-free to GM and its stockholders for Federal income tax purposes. |
|
|
You request an opinion that: 1) as of the time of the closing of the Exchange and Sale, the Class H Stock is a qualifying employer security within the meaning of ERISA section 407(d)(5) and for purposes of ERISA section 408(e); and 2) immediately following the closing of the Exchange and Sale, the 50% independent of the issuer test of ERISA section 407(f)(1)(B) is either not applicable, or, if applicable, is satisfied because more than 50% of the Hughes Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding will be held by persons independent of GM. |
|
|
GM is an employer whose employees are covered by the GM Plans, and thus is a party in interest to the GM Plans under section 3(14)(C) of ERISA. Section 406(a)(1)(A) prohibits any sale or exchange between a plan and a party in interest. Section 408(e) of ERISA provides a conditional exemption from the prohibitions of section 406 for, as here relevant, the sale of qualifying employer securities by a plan to a party in interest, provided that the sale is for adequate consideration and that no commission is charged with respect thereto. Section 407(d)(5) of ERISA defines the term “qualifying employer security,” as here relevant, to be an employer security that is stock. With respect to plans that are not eligible individual account plans, section 407(f)(1) further requires that in order for stock to be a qualifying employer security, no more than 25% of the aggregate amount of the same class of stock issued and outstanding is held by the plan and that at least 50% of such aggregate amount is held by persons independent of the issuer. Section 407(d)(1) defines the term “employer security” as a security issued by an employer of employees covered under the plan or by an affiliate of such employer. Section 407(d)(5) provides that a corporation is an affiliate of an employer if it is a member of a controlled group of corporations of which the employer is a member. |
|
|
You represent that prior to the Exchange and Sale, Hughes is an affiliate of GM because GM owns more than 50% of Hughes common stock. GM is an employer whose employees are covered by the GM Plans, while Hughes is an employer whose employees are covered by the Hughes Plan. Accordingly, both the GM Class H Stock and the Hughes Class A Common Stock are employer securities with respect to the GM Plans and the Hughes Plan within the meaning of section 407(d)(1) of ERISA. In addition, common stock that represents an equity interest in the issuer is considered stock as that term is used in section 407(d)(5) of ERISA Therefore, both the GM Class H Stock and the Hughes Class A Common Stock are stock. You represent that none of the Plans own more than 25% of the GM Class H Stock, and that persons independent of GM own at least 50% of the GM Class H Stock. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Department that the GM Class H Stock and the Hughes Class A Common Stock are qualifying employer securities with respect to both the GM Plans and the Hughes Plan prior to the Exchange.(7) |
|
|
After the Exchange and Sale have been completed, GM will own none of the Hughes Class A Common Stock. Therefore, Hughes will cease to be an affiliate of GM, and immediately following the transaction, the Hughes Class A Common Stock will not be an employer security with respect to the GM Plans. Accordingly, it is the opinion of the Department that the requirements of section 407(f)(1) will not apply to the Hughes Class A Common Stock held by those GM Plans that are not individual account plans.(8) |
|
|
ERISA's general standards of fiduciary conduct also would apply to the proposed Exchange. Section 404 requires a fiduciary, among other things, to discharge his duties respecting a plan solely in the interest of the plan's participants and beneficiaries, in a prudent fashion, and in accordance with the terms of the plan to the extent that they are consistent with Titles I and IV of ERISA. |
|
|
This letter constitutes an advisory opinion under ERISA Procedure 76-1 (41 Fed. Reg. 36281, August 27, 1976). Accordingly, this letter is issued subject to the provisions of the procedure, including section 10 relating to the effect of advisory opinions. |
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
|