skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital ImageryŠ copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov

Previous Section

Content Last Revised: 4/15/99
---DISCLAIMER---

CFR  

Code of Federal Regulations Pertaining to ETA

Title 20  

Employees' Benefits

 

Chapter V  

Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor

 

 

Part 667  

Administrative Provisions Under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act

 

 

 

Subpart A  

Funding


20 CFR 667.170 - What responsibility review does the Department conduct for awards made under WIA title I, subtitle D?

  • Section Number: 667.170
  • Section Name: What responsibility review does the Department conduct for awards made under WIA title I, subtitle D?

    (a) Before final selection as a potential grantee, the Department 

conducts a review of the available records to assess the organization's 

overall responsibility to administer Federal funds. As part of this 

review, the Department may consider any information that has come to 

its attention and will consider the organization's history with regard 

to the management of other grants, including DOL grants. The failure to 

meet any one responsibility test, except for those listed in paragraphs 

(a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, does not establish that the 

organization is not responsible unless the failure is substantial or 

persistent (for two or more consecutive years). The responsibility 

tests include:

    (1) The organization's efforts to recover debts (for which three 

demand letters have been sent) established by final agency action have 

been unsuccessful, or that there has been failure to comply with an 

approved repayment plan;

    (2) Established fraud or criminal activity of a significant nature 

within the organization.

    (3) Serious administrative deficiencies identified by the 

Department, such as failure to maintain a financial management system 

as required by Federal regulations;

    (4) Willful obstruction of the audit process;

    (5) Failure to provide services to applicants as agreed to in a 

current or recent grant or to meet applicable performance standards;

    (6) Failure to correct deficiencies brought to the grantee's 

attention in writing as a result of monitoring activities, reviews, 

assessments, or other activities;

    (7) Failure to return a grant closeout package or outstanding 

advances within 90 days of the grant expiration date or receipt of 

closeout package, whichever is later, unless an extension has been 

requested and granted; final billings reflecting serious cost category 

or total budget cost overrun;

    (8) Failure to submit required reports;

    (9) Failure to properly report and dispose of government property 

as instructed by DOL;

    (10) Failure to have maintained effective cash management or cost 

controls resulting in excess cash on hand;

    (11) Failure to ensure that a subrecipient complies with its OMB 

Circular A-133 audit requirements specified at Sec. 667.200(b);

    (12) Failure to audit a subrecipient within the required period;

    (13) Final disallowed costs in excess of five percent of the grant 

or contract award if, in the judgement of the grant officer, the 

disallowances are egregious findings and;

    (14) Failure to establish a mechanism to resolve a subrecipient's 

audit in a timely fashion.

    (b) This responsibility review is independent of the competitive 

process. Applicants which are determined to be not responsible will not 

be selected as potential grantees irrespective of their standing in the 

competition.
Previous Section



Phone Numbers