Previous Section

Content Last Revised: 1/19/01
---DISCLAIMER---

Next Section

CFR  

Code of Federal Regulations Pertaining to U.S. Department of Labor

Title 20  

Employees' Benefits

 

Chapter VI  

Employment Standards Administration, Department of Labor

 

 

Part 718  

Standards for Determining Coal Miners' Total Disability or Death Due to Pneumoconiosis

 

 

 

Subpart B  

Criteria for the Development of Medical Evidence


20 CFR 718.104 - Report of physical examinations.

  • Section Number: 718.104
  • Section Name: Report of physical examinations.

    (a) A report of any physical examination conducted in connection 
with a claim shall be prepared on a medical report form supplied by the 
Office or in a manner containing substantially the same information. 
Any such report shall include the following information and test 
results:
    (1) The miner's medical and employment history;
    (2) All manifestations of chronic respiratory disease;
    (3) Any pertinent findings not specifically listed on the form;
    (4) If heart disease secondary to lung disease is found, all 
symptoms and significant findings;
    (5) The results of a chest X-ray conducted and interpreted as 
required by Sec. 718.102; and
    (6) The results of a pulmonary function test conducted and reported 
as required by Sec. 718.103. If the miner is physically unable to 
perform a pulmonary function test or if the test is medically 
contraindicated, in the absence of evidence establishing total 
disability pursuant to Sec. 718.304, the report must be based on other 
medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques, 
such as a blood gas study.
    (b) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (a), a report of 
physical examination may be based on any other procedures such as 
electrocardiogram, blood-gas studies conducted and reported as required 
by Sec. 718.105, and other blood analyses which, in the physician's 
opinion, aid in his or her evaluation of the miner.
    (c) In the case of a deceased miner, where no report is in 
substantial compliance with paragraphs (a) and (b), a report prepared 
by a physician who is unavailable may nevertheless form the basis for a 
finding if, in the opinion of the adjudication officer, it is 
accompanied by sufficient indicia of reliability in light of all 
relevant evidence.
    (d) Treating physician. In weighing the medical evidence of record 
relevant to whether the miner suffers, or suffered, from 
pneumoconiosis, whether the pneumoconiosis arose out of coal mine 
employment, and whether the miner is, or was, totally disabled by 
pneumoconiosis or died due to pneumoconiosis, the adjudication officer 
must give consideration to the relationship between the miner and any 
treating physician whose report is admitted into the record. 
Specifically, the adjudication officer shall take into consideration 
the following factors in weighing the opinion of the miner's treating 
physician:
    (1) Nature of relationship. The opinion of a physician who has 
treated the miner for respiratory or pulmonary conditions is entitled 
to more weight than a physician who has treated the miner for non-
respiratory conditions;
    (2) Duration of relationship. The length of the treatment 
relationship demonstrates whether the physician has observed the miner 
long enough to obtain a superior understanding of his or her condition;
    (3) Frequency of treatment. The frequency of physician-patient 
visits demonstrates whether the physician has observed the miner often 
enough to obtain a superior understanding of his or her condition; and
    (4) Extent of treatment. The types of testing and examinations 
conducted during the treatment relationship demonstrate whether the 
physician has obtained superior and relevant information concerning the 
miner's condition.
    (5) In the absence of contrary probative evidence, the adjudication 
officer shall accept the statement of a physician with regard to the 
factors listed in paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of this section. In 
appropriate cases, the relationship between the miner and his treating 
physician may constitute substantial evidence in support of the 
adjudication officer's decision to give that physician's opinion 
controlling weight, provided that the weight given to the opinion of a 
miner's treating physician shall also be based on the credibility of 
the physician's opinion in light of its reasoning and documentation, 
other relevant evidence and the record as a whole.
Previous Section

Next Section