skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital ImageryŠ copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov

Previous Section

Content Last Revised: 5/17/50
---DISCLAIMER---

Next Section

CFR  

Code of Federal Regulations Pertaining to ESA

Title 29  

Labor

 

Chapter V  

Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor

 

 

Part 776  

Interpretative Bulletin on the General Coverage of the Wage and Hours Provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

 

 

 

Subpart A  

General


29 CFR 776.12 - Employees traveling across State lines.

  • Section Number: 776.12
  • Section Name: Employees traveling across State lines.

    Questions are frequently asked as to whether the fact that an 
employee crosses State lines in connection with his employment brings 
him within the Act's coverage as an employee ``engaged in commerce.'' 
Typical of the employments in which such questions arise are those of 
traveling service men, traveling buyers, traveling construction crews, 
collectors, and employees of such organizations as circuses, carnivals, 
road shows, and orchestras. The area of coverage in such situations 
cannot be delimited by any exact formula, since questions of degree are 
necessarily involved. If the employee transports material or equipment 
or other persons across State lines or within a particular State as a 
part of an interstate movement, it is clear of course, that he is 
engaging in commerce.47  And as a general rule, employees who 
are regularly engaged in traveling across State lines in the performance 
of their duties (as distinguished from merely going to and from their 
homes or lodgings in commuting to a work place) are engaged in commerce 
and covered by the Act.48  On the other hand, it is equally 
plain that an employee who, in isolated or sporadic instances, happens 
to cross a State line in the course of his employment, which is 
otherwise intrastate in character, is not, for that sole reason, covered 
by the Act. Nor would a man who occasionally moves to another State in 
order to pursue an essentially local trade or occupation there become an 
employee ``engaged in commerce'' by virtue of that fact alone. Doubtful 
questions arising in the area between the two extremes must be resolved 
on the basis of the facts in each individual case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    47 The employee may, however, be exempt from the overtime 
provisions of the Act under section 13(b)(1). See part 792 of this 
chapter.
    48 Reck v. Zarmocay, 264 App. Div. 520, 36 N.Y.S. 2d 394; 
Colbeck v. Dairyland Creamery Co., 17 N.W. 2d 262 (S. Ct. S.D.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous Section

Next Section



Phone Numbers