|
Subscribe to E-mail Updates
|
|
U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Working Together for Public Service
Coalition Labor Agreement
The parties achieved a consolidation of six union contracts into one and "cleaned-up"
their employer-employee relationships.
Consensus Decisions & Collaborative Bargaining
A significant decrease in adversarial positioning resulted from moving to
a process of consensus decision making.
Development of and Training in Interest-Based Problem Solving
Challenge to Change and Time to Cooperate
The parties achieved a substantial improvement in the handling of
biosolids.
Compressed Salary Schedule
School employees eliminated six steps in their pay schedule and received a
substantial pay increase.
Court Unification through Labor Management Cooperation
Process developed to aid in the transition from a county-funded trial
court system to state-funded system.
Continuous Quality Improvement
This joint effort (85% of employees unionized in Department of
Transportation) has focused on safety improvement and now includes an
annual quality training and recognition conference. It's an award-winning
program.
Curbside Refuse Collection Program
The focus is on the Remote Water Meter Reading Program and the Refuse
Collection Program. Both have decreased cost and improved customer
satisfaction.
Labor Management Committee
This joint committee in the Rochester school district examines and
resolves problems that the contract does not address.
Loan Interchange Law (RIGL 42-40)
A cooperative project that permits state government agencies, in times of
austerity, to share (loan) staff.
Merger and Reorganization of Fire Department and the Bureau of Paramedical Rescue
Handling Citizen Complaint Calls Through the Total Quality Transformation (TQT) Process
Philadelphia School District Cooperative Initiative
A formalized, inclusive communications process involving all employee
groups representing school district staff.
Plan for School-Based Planning and Shared Decision Making
A way to improve the quality of instruction and the work environment for
teachers.
Quality through Participation
How a change in state political leadership has changed this union's
perception of the value of cooperation
Remote Meter Program
Describes the benefits, human and financial, achieved by converting from
direct read to electronically encoded water meters.
Testing Services Division Revitalization
A project to consolidate, automate, and engage all levels of workers in an
effort to improve the quality of work and worklife.
Ulster County-CSEA Labor/Management Committee
Alabama D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) Training Center
Trains police officers to work cooperatively with public schools on drug
prevention programs.
CALM (Cooperative Association of Labor and Management)
Improve labor/management communication with focus on problem areas; where
communication has broken down.
Collaborative Efforts to Stop the Demand for Drugs
Compensation Review Study and Resulting Market-Based Pay System
Employee Involvement in Public Safety Compensation and Performance Management Systems Design
Excellent People Improving Quality (EPIQ)
Employees work in teams to identify ways to improve customer service.
The Fox Squad
Community policing in high crime, high density public housing.
Personnel Rules Revision Committee
Refuse Collection Incentive Program
Has resulted in significant crew performance and customer satisfaction.
Safety Bonus Day Program
A joint labor-management project to make work safer for employees and save
money on worker compensation premiums.
Springfield Initiative
A customer/employee service survey to improve city services.
Quality Management in Arkansas State Government
A program to involve state employees in problem solving and decision
making.
Alternate Work Schedule
Extends hours that staff is available to clients in a way that better
serves both employees and customers.
Building Austin's Standard in Customer Service (BASICS)
A cooperative program that has succeeded in improving citizen attitudes
about city services.
Citizen and Neighborhood Services Pilot Projects
Is a labor-management project that seeks to create an efficient,
user-friendly information and response systems throughout the city.
Goal Planning for the Future
Employee involvement in setting the goals for this fire department has
resulted in better morale and service quality.
"Kaiser-on-the Job" 24- Hour Managed Care
A project to test the effectiveness of bringing managed care to workers'
compensation.
Mutual Gain Bargaining and Labor Management Committees
Also called interest based negotiations, this process leads to less
adversarial bargaining.
Neighborhood Improvement Program
Staff from city departments formed teams to address problems specific to
neighborhoods
Reinventing Union Sanitary District
This project improved operational effectiveness and customer service
through employee empowerment.
Collective Bargaining Health Care Saving Transferred into Base Wage Increase
Lansing, MI
Cooperative/Collaborative Process
Focuses on how the cooperative process has improved employee morale and
the quality of education.
Disability Management Project
Employee Insurance Task Force
Decisions about employees insurances no longer made by City Administrator
but by Employee Insurance Task Force who negotiate coverage and cost
directly with insurance companies.
Innovation in Recruiting and Hiring: Attracting the Best and Brightest to Wisconsin State Government
Joint Health Care Committee
A cooperative approach to negotiating health care coverages and costs.
Joint Labor-Management Committee to Control Health Care Cost
Labor-Management Committees & Shared Decisions
Promotion and creation of cooperative committees by State Bureau of
Mediation Services and the Minnesota School Boards Association.
Labor-Management-Health Care Cost Containment Committee
Operation "Street Pride"
This joint labor-management project established a "safe haven"
symbol and process for the children of Springfield to use in times of
distress.
Quality Minneapolis Budget System Redesign
A process that involves all stakeholders in budget redesign and outcome
based decision making.
State Human Resources Reform Act of 1994
A project to reform Oklahoma's State Government personnel system.
State of Nebraska Labor/Management Council
An FMCS initiated program in the Department of Public Institutions to help
them resolve workplace issues, like the disciplinary process.
Total Quality Management
An effort to improve service delivery systems through the practices of
TQM.
Upward Mobility Program
Is a joint training program which provides career counseling, direct
tuition payment, and promotional priority.
Grievance Mediation
Task Force Survey
As part of its informaton gathering activity, the Task Force sought examples of excellence in public service that came about through workplace cooperation. Some of the people that provided examples were asked to make presentations at some of the regional hearings of the Task Force. This questionnaire was completed by the persons in an organization who were involved in seeking service and workplace excellence.
SURVEY FORM
The Secretary's Task Force is seeking examples of excellence in policy, programs or services that have significant or primary roots in workplace cooperation. The Secretary's Task Force has a mandate to identify such examples of excellence and to identify the factors that support and sustain cooperation leading to excellence. The Task Force will be able to hear from or visit a selected number of examples brought to its attention. The Task Force will examine the trends and common features in other examples provided to us, and will publicize, through its report and other means, examples, resources, and key principles from which other public workplaces can learn.
In this questionnaire, we are asking your organization to inform us about examples of workplace excellence from which we and others in the public service can learn. Please answer the attached questions. If possible, please fill out jointly, so that the employee and management groups involved can comfortably sign off on the form. Please complete and return as soon as possible in order to maximize the chance of your example being included in the Task Force's report.
When completed please fax to Professor Jon Brock (206) 616-1748 or mail to Prof. Brock at the Cascade Center for Public Service, University of Washington, 303 Parrington Hall, DC-14, Seattle WA 98195.
If you have questions, please call Leslie Redd at the Cascade Center, (206) 685-0523.
Agency: __________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________ Contact person(s): _________________________________________ Phone: _________________________________________________ Fax: ____________________________________________________ Name of Project or Initiative: _____________________________
RESULTS
1. Please describe the primary result of the cooperative effort you are describing in terms of improvement in service effectiveness or efficiency. On an attached page, please write a few paragraphs that summarize the impact of the improvement, i.e., change in service effectiveness, improvement in service quality or customer satisfaction, better match of skills to task, lower cost of a key service, policy change, etc. If you have any measurements that demonstrate the extent of the improvement, please note them also.
2. Please describe the results in terms of the impact on the quality of work and worklife.
3. Describe changes, if any, in the process or technology or in the way the job is done. Include changes in interactions within the agency and relationships with other agencies, customers or suppliers.
4. How pervasive is the change? For example, what is the size of the agency budget and workforce involved? Does it represent a whole department, the whole city, county, state, school district, fire district, etc.? If it has moved beyond its original location, how was the idea transferred?
5. Has there been any alteration in features of the personnel or civil service system as a result of or as a prelude to this service improvement? For example, were there any changes in classification practices, compensation systems, hiring, transfer or removal practices as part of this service improvement?
PROCESS
1. Were there any false starts or barriers in the process that were overcome on the way to success? What were those and how were they overcome?
3. What accounts for the longevity of the project, or for its demise? What has sustained it?
4. From where was the most resistance and how was it handled? How successfully?
5. Is there a state bargaining law operational in this jurisdiction? Are there aspects of that statute and its related regulatory structure that contributed to making this change successful? Are there aspects of that structure that had to be worked around in order to implement the changes described above? If there is not a state bargaining law, was there an employee association involved?
7. Has this change in service and relationships now survived an election cycle or change in either labor or management leadership? What effect have elections, elected officials or political relationships had on the project?
TYPE OF CORPORATION
1. How is the cooperation carried out? Is there a formal committee or other forum? Please describe.
2. What form of agreement defines the ongoing cooperative arrangement or other governance of this change in service or policy?
GENESIS
3. What, if any other outside assistance was helpful (or harmful!)?
4. What else should others know about this change in service and job quality that would help them do something similar or otherwise learn from your experience?
5. Is there any other feature of this service improvement through cooperation you are especially proud of or wish to highlight?